RedWingsNow*
Guest
Just in case you forgot.
Wow. Stunning speed.
Dude was wide open on the right side.
Jiri Hudler could have had time to make that play
Just in case you forgot.
Wow... You do not know how to spell complimentary correctly. Congrats on looking like a child.
I have more of a problem with you trying to trivialize Brunner than him being called a complimentary player. You always seem to try to nitpick and show how one person isn't so special because you feel the need to show everyone how you know everything and explain how the Wings aren't so good when they do in fact do something good.
He hasn't shown it.
I see it in the scouting report.
I think Tatar would score 20-25 next to Datsyuk and 10 more on the PP
http://the-word-blog.com/2010/04/12/complementary-vs-complimentary/
I'm not willing to gloat about Brunner being awesome until he shows me he's more than a product of his circumstance.
Saying he is a product of his circumstance is a 2-way street though. Do you think it is a coincidence that Brunner is tied for 4th in the league in goals and Zetterberg is also tied for 2nd in assists. Maybe Zetterberg is benefitting from playing with a player who can snipe as well.
If Semin was doing the exact same thing Brunner was this year you would be saying that Semin is bolstering whatever line he is playing on, but for some reason you won't give Brunner that credit.
Saying he is a product of his circumstance is a 2-way street though. Do you think it is a coincidence that Brunner is tied for 4th in the league in goals and Zetterberg is also tied for 2nd in assists. Maybe Zetterberg is benefitting from playing with a player who can snipe as well.
If Semin was doing the exact same thing Brunner was this year you would be saying that Semin is bolstering whatever line he is playing on, but for some reason you won't give Brunner that credit.
Semin 4 goals
Hudler 4 goals
Mursak 0 goals
Brunner 10 goals
DOES NOT COMPUTE.
Another post that presumes to tell me what "I would be saying."
Another post that presumes to tell me what "I would be saying."
Another post that presumes to tell me what "I would be saying."
I have a feeling Semin would have more than four goals if he was in Detroit.
With our terrible coaching and management?
Wow... You do not know how to spell complimentary correctly. Congrats on looking like a child.
Jesus only managed to turn water into wine.
The fact you are a copy editor and are subsequently wrong on this, is highly amusing. I didn't misspell anything. I merely used what was once an interchangeable word. Apparently it is no longer the case, as this is news to me.As a former copy editor, it's "complementary". The fact that you misspelled it, were corrected, and then proceeded to vigorously insult the person who gave you the correct spelling is highly humorous
The fact you are a copy editor and are subsequently wrong on this, is highly amusing. I didn't misspell anything. I merely used what was once an interchangeable word. Apparently it is no longer the case, as this is news to me.
The word you used should be used in an example such as "...the complimentary in-flight meal." Meaning free, included, without charge, etc.
"Complementary" means to form a complement with something or, alternatively, be a complement to something. Such as "We have three varieties of wine, all of which are complementary to the complimentary in-flight meal." In this example you are getting the meal free, but you are paying for the wine.
The fact you are a copy editor and are subsequently wrong on this, is highly amusing. I didn't misspell anything. I merely used what was once an interchangeable word. Apparently it is no longer the case, as this is news to me.
Not to flood this thread with this topic but the definition you provided shows that you are spelling it wrong. Complimentary can't be used in that context, complementary can.
Did I take a wrong turn? I appear to have found the spelling and grammar section of HF.