Prospect Info: Bruins Prospects XXIV

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,417
11,799
Could someone please post 3-4 modern examples of players that scored 10 points in a full NCAA rookie season, then went on to become contributing top six talent in the NHL? Just would like to see where the precedent was set.
Haven't done a deep dive, but I couldn't find any that sprung to mind. That said, he is a project and was always a project. But the best comp I could find was Brian Boyle. 6'6 8pts at BC in his freshman year. Boyle was a horrific skater at that age, but had decent hands. Letourneau is more skilled but I'm not sure how significantly more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TCB

JoeIsAStud

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
12,762
7,323
Visit site
Haven't done a deep dive, but I couldn't find any that sprung to mind. That said, he is a project and was always a project. But the best comp I could find was Brian Boyle. 6'6 8pts at BC in his freshman year. Boyle was a horrific skater at that age, but had decent hands. Letourneau is more skilled but I'm not sure how significantly more.
It is a somewhat interesting comparison. Dean's starts were like 10-20% better in HS (per game basis) , and I think they played a slightly better set of opponents, but maybe not on average. . He is a good bit better as a skater.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,417
11,799
It is a somewhat interesting comparison. Dean's starts were like 10-20% better in HS (per game basis) , and I think they played a slightly better set of opponents, but maybe not on average. . He is a good bit better as a skater.
Yeah, the other obvious comp that people used around the draft was Tage Thompson. But Thompson played at a higher level in his D -1 year and his DY. Just was more proven at an already higher level.

I didn't love the Letourneau pick at all when it was made - I would have taken Greentree or Chernyshov, but neither are Cs. That said, I didn't expect much from Letourneau this year, so I'm not "that" discouraged by his stats. It's not "great", but you drafted him for what he'll be at 23-24 not what he'll be at 19.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,804
22,540
Tyler, TX
Yeah, the other obvious comp that people used around the draft was Tage Thompson. But Thompson played at a higher level in his D -1 year and his DY. Just was more proven at an already higher level.

I didn't love the Letourneau pick at all when it was made - I would have taken Greentree or Chernyshov, but neither are Cs. That said, I didn't expect much from Letourneau this year, so I'm not "that" discouraged by his stats. It's not "great", but you drafted him for what he'll be at 23-24 not what he'll be at 19.

Maybe he's Tage Thompson if Thompson took the same career path, and Dean will take a couple more years to develop. Or he could be a giant stiff that never even earns an AHL contract. He's the definition of a sketchy dice roll pick, but one that could really be worth the gamble.
 

PatriceBergeronFan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2011
62,046
40,942
USA
Haven't done a deep dive, but I couldn't find any that sprung to mind. That said, he is a project and was always a project. But the best comp I could find was Brian Boyle. 6'6 8pts at BC in his freshman year. Boyle was a horrific skater at that age, but had decent hands. Letourneau is more skilled but I'm not sure how significantly more.
That would be unfortunate.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,804
22,540
Tyler, TX
That would be unfortunate.

Boyle did play almost 900 games in the league. Not an exciting player by any stretch, but for a late first round pick (Boyle went 26th, Letourneau 25) that has to be considered a draft win, so if Letourneau carves out a career along those lines, it's okay., Lots of guys taken that late even in the first round do jack squat in NHL.
 

JoeIsAStud

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
12,762
7,323
Visit site
Yeah, the other obvious comp that people used around the draft was Tage Thompson. But Thompson played at a higher level in his D -1 year and his DY. Just was more proven at an already higher level.

I didn't love the Letourneau pick at all when it was made - I would have taken Greentree or Chernyshov, but neither are Cs. That said, I didn't expect much from Letourneau this year, so I'm not "that" discouraged by his stats. It's not "great", but you drafted him for what he'll be at 23-24 not what he'll be at 19.

Where we diverge is I loved the pick at the time and would make the same pick if the draft was tomorrow and we had the additional 6 months of data. And it's not just the center thing, I still thing it was a home run swing which they haven't done enough of.
 

PatriceBergeronFan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2011
62,046
40,942
USA
Boyle did play almost 900 games in the league. Not an exciting player by any stretch, but for a late first round pick (Boyle went 26th, Letourneau 25) that has to be considered a draft win, so if Letourneau carves out a career along those lines, it's okay., Lots of guys taken that late even in the first round do jack squat in NHL.
Just not what the Bruins desperately need now and in three years. Overall it would be a win.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad