No we didn't.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
That's why he's making a million dollars and still passed through waivers
Punches some faces though
No we didn't.
Incorrect.
The 30-day period applies when a player is recalled from the minors. Brooks has not been in the minors this season.
As stated in previous posts, if the Leafs are the only team to put in a claim they can (and they will) send him directly to the minors.
Thanks, thought it was noon.We'll find out around 2 PM EST.
Isn't Vegas below the Leafs in the standings?Thats means the leafs didn't even put in a claim
Not sure how reliable Jeff is, but he said Leafs did put in a claim for Brooks, but Vegas is ahead of them on the wire.
How is Vegas ahead? They finished above the Leafs last year in the standings.
How is Vegas ahead? They finished above the Leafs last year in the standings.
I think the Leafs would have had to keep Brooks in the NHL if they had waiver priority over VGK in this situation, no?
Aren't waivers based on the current league standings not last season's?
I think the Leafs would have had to keep Brooks in the NHL if they had waiver priority over VGK in this situation, no?
Of course, he is the more experienced and reliable player.So last game the Knights were finally healthy enough to get to choose who to put in the lineup for the first time.
They chose to play Amadio.
They sat Brooks.
How is Vegas ahead? They finished above the Leafs last year in the standings.