leetch99
Leetch66 Joined 2007
OMG...that might be the post of the year TOO FUNNY !!!!!!This kids better than we thought if he can get under the skin of people sitting at home as well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
OMG...that might be the post of the year TOO FUNNY !!!!!!This kids better than we thought if he can get under the skin of people sitting at home as well.
How tf are there 13 pages on this guy already
I like your moxie! I do like Lemieux but Hayes was great this year. Last season I’d have agreed though.Low-key confession: Lemieux > Hayes.
Trade is a huge bang. Really nicely done.
Actually I’ve been reading on and wanting pepe’s Son for awhile yes. Read years ago the kid was like a mirror image of his dad but faster and since Winnipeg became a possible destination for some of our player last years yeah the kid has been on my radar. Potential Marchand/Gallagher-lite. And obviously you didn’t watch the game bc he had the puck a lot and was playing net front on the 2nd PP unit. Ever occur to you the amateur hour comment was about Ottawa and what was going down? Dude your just sore bc one of the rangers brass actually mentioned you on a video and kinda took a shot at you. Your not getting your agenda past me, I’m a hawkLike I said, I watched Lemieux extensively before the trade. He was a nondescript prospect. Am I not allowed to voice my legitimate concerns — concerns echoed by the analytics community?
Did anyone on this forum either know Lemieux existed, considered him a legit prospect or coveted him during trade rumor talks? Nope. But magically, one game is all it takes for everyone to anoint him the next Avery.
You can’t deliver a hit if you have possession of the puck. No surprise Lemieux had seven hits.
Exactly. Duchene got 2 of CLB’s #2-5 best prospects and cost them a guaranteed top 4 pick. Stone with an 8year commitment !!!! only cost Vegas brannstrom and a 2nd. Minnesota GM pulled what I guess in some books would be called ‘amateur hour’ bc he was locked in on a player he wanted for a player he wanted to move before said player was set to become a rental forward next year, and took a one-for-one to nail the deal without any picks or prospects included. That’s suspect. Rangers easily could have had fiala for Kreider. Rangers were probably asking fiala, tolvanen and fabbro for him.How are we to compare what Nashville and Vegas did to what the Rangers did?
Granlund would not be compared to anything the Rangers sold, he had a year left on his deal. Had they sold Kreider perhaps that would be closer to apples to apples and even then I'd think the preference and value would have been pro Granlund.
Who did the Rangers sell who was on par with Stone? Who also subsequently extended? I don't see any comparison there o what the Rangers sold or even could have sold.
Being upset about the Rangers rebuild, not getting in the best lottery position concerns me as well, yet that clouding up what happened at the deadlines to the point of making comparisons that should not really be made seems fruitless.
As far as Lemieux and the rebuild, in my opinion they added a pending RFA, one who will likely be bridged, same as ADA, Pionk, Buch.
If it turns out Lemieux is good enough to really effect their draft position now or next year, wouldn't that mean this trade was pretty good?
Exactly. Duchene got 2-5 best prospects and cost them a guaranteed top 4 pick. Stone with an 8year commitment !!!! Only cost them brannstrom and a 2nd. Minnesota GM pulled what I guess in some books would be called ‘amateur hour’ bc he was locked in on a player he wanted for a player he wanted to move before said player was set to become a rental forward next year, and took a one-for-one to nail the deal without any picks or prospects included. That’s suspect. Rangers easily could have had fiala for Kreider. Rangers were probably asking fiala, tolvanen and fabbro got him.
Initially I thought the fact that Kreider was here past the deadline meant he was getting an extension, but I’m not sure about that anything. With 30 teams looking for improve, once the draft order is decided, there will be more potential buyers. The market was such a buyers market. Happy gorton did as well as he did, glad we weren’t trading mcdonagh this year, and I’m happy he didn’t settle for less and trade Kreider for low offers
Lemieux also has some great DNA . His dad probably one of the best NHL playoff performers EVER . That is probably why he played on 3 clubs and won 4 Cups....but that does also make one wonder why he was moved around ? Well...as much as I love him and his style I do feel he will have a shelf life here as do many of the agitator types . So...in saying that...I hope he can be kept under reins by the coach and the team and give us 5-6 great seasons to enjoy . I am sure there will be highs and lows...but for the time being we will just pray the highs outdo the lows LOL...
Hopefully (I’d say likely, but who knows) JG has an idea of Kreider’s contract requirements. And they’re on the same page.I assume most people would, most of the hot takes should come with syrup.
I was of the belief that the Rangers should have sold Kreider had they been able to get more than rental like returns for him, then I saw the market did not provide that.
I still see the Rangers faced with two not great options, sell him for less than anyone will like (including myself), or extend him to something no one will like after about half of that extension.
Yet given the returns this deadline, they may as well likely have held on to him as the difference between those returns, this deadline versus even next, did not inspire me to say it was a mistake to not sell him.
This deadline no team could have traded for him and instant extended him, maybe that changes his value, maybe the draft is a better market, albeit with one less playoffs, I'm not so sure, yet at the very least I understand the plausibility that them holding on to him this deadline could make more sense.
Lemieux also has some great DNA . His dad probably one of the best NHL playoff performers EVER . That is probably why he played on 3 clubs and won 4 Cups....but that does also make one wonder why he was moved around ? Well...as much as I love him and his style I do feel he will have a shelf life here as do many of the agitator types . So...in saying that...I hope he can be kept under reins by the coach and the team and give us 5-6 great seasons to enjoy . I am sure there will be highs and lows...but for the time being we will just pray the highs outdo the lows LOL...
I wouldn’t say that. I’d say both montour and Muzzin would have gotten more at another deadline. Hayes and duchene as wellIt was a buyers market for wingers, for D it was a sellers market. For centers, it was an market-value market.
I wouldn’t say that. I’d say both montour and Muzzin would have gotten more at another deadline. Hayes and duchene as well
LOL....and I hated him with a PASSION . Likely we all did especially when he was a Devil . He would do ANYTHING to win.Those types always have a very fine line to walk.
Though in Lemieux's case, he was also a fairly underrated player: four 30 seasons (would've been at least 5 but he missed time), a 40 goal season, 4 cups, nearly 400 career goals and nearly 800 career points. He was the kind of player winning teams looked for.
I'm not sure if this is sarcasm, but you literally suggested Hayes for Lemieux + 1st + _______I’m just going to weigh in that I did in fact know who Lemieux was prior to the trade. Just for the record. Not sure many people knew that I knew about him. I kept it pretty quiet.
I’m just going to weigh in that I did in fact know who Lemieux was prior to the trade. Just for the record. Not sure many people knew that I knew about him. I kept it pretty quiet.
I'm not sure if this is sarcasm, but you literally suggested Hayes for Lemieux + 1st + _______
Speculation: - Roster Building Thread: Part XXV - Time to say Goodbye
That's typically true because of PP time.And the counter that some would make is that's its not uncommon for guys to score more in higher roles on weaker teams, but be better suited to other roles on better teams.
Kind of the big fish in a small pond or smaller fisher in a big pond debate.
Not saying it's entirely fair or accurate, but the greater interest was in Hayes as a third liner.
I don’t approve of sarcasm.Yes I’m being sarcastic! Thirty One, cmon man!
Has anyone else seen Lemieux’s interview after the game? That kid oozes the no quit, follow me I’ll get us there attitude. It’s the same thing Lias exudes. Guys who just will their way to do whatever it takes.
I just finished the game from last night and he actually exceeded my expectations. He seemed faster than I remember seeing him in Winnipeg and he has the effect of bringing energy and pulling his teammates into the fight. More emotion on a nightly basis is going to be something he can provide that this team has been lacking.
On top of that, I see a kid who understands the game, skates well and is willing to go to the dirty areas to score goals. His skills are being undersold by many just for the simple fact that he does other things than just play a skill game.
If Gorton wants this team to develop more of an edge these are the types of guys that are needed. Guys who can play, provide offense and play a physical game.
Has anyone else seen Lemieux’s interview after the game? That kid oozes the no quit, follow me I’ll get us there attitude. It’s the same thing Lias exudes. Guys who just will their way to do whatever it takes.
I just finished the game from last night and he actually exceeded my expectations. He seemed faster than I remember seeing him in Winnipeg and he has the effect of bringing energy and pulling his teammates into the fight. More emotion on a nightly basis is going to be something he can provide that this team has been lacking.
On top of that, I see a kid who understands the game, skates well and is willing to go to the dirty areas to score goals. His skills are being undersold by many just for the simple fact that he does other things than just play a skill game.
If Gorton wants this team to develop more of an edge these are the types of guys that are needed. Guys who can play, provide offense and play a physical game.