What? Brassard would be the best center Montreal has had in years.I would See Brassard on our 4th line in Mtl.
what's the ask ? Schlemko + hudon ?
haha there's no f***ing way JR is trading Brass to the Caps so he can regain form and torture the Pens in the playoffs. Not a chance.Is Brass still good on FOs? If so I could see the Caps as a match but even then Eller is kinda entrenched as 3C and he’s not going anywhere.
Also considering the teams all I’d be willing to offer is Herpes. As in, literally in exchange for Brassard the Pens get Actual Herpes.
This is just nonsense. Lucic has negative value. Loui Eriksson has negative value. A proven top 6 center who can put up respectable point totals does not have negative value. He's a UFA after the season too. Get outta here with the "negative value" garbBrassard has negative value to his contract
If you don't need us to retain, than Brassard and Jarry would be an even swap for us. If you need us to retain (his AAV is $6M) then we'd want more coming back of course. What level of retention would you want?
You must have a good genie!So the Wild needs more offensive talent, they need to get younger and more dynamic offensively and they'll trade a 26-year-old Coyle who is signed for this and the next season and has shown he can outscore the other guy for a 31 year old signed for only this season as the main piece coming back?
I hate the Wild and wish them nothing but eternal mediocrity, but even I can see they should not make this deal.
He'd be perfect for EDM. 14 pts., makes 4M, 31 yo. Purrfect!Could be an interesting target for the Oilers. What's the ask?
Jordan Staal at $3M for the next four years and you'd be willing to give up a 2nd? Where do we sign....Staal's cap hit being 6M, I guess we would need 50%. I'd be ready to give up a 2nd for that with not much hesitation as Staal has term AND is a known fit in the Burgh.
Brassard isn’t a want or need in any sort of way.Insider Trading
Pittsburgh media members have been saying this for months at this point, but it's still worthwhile to share. The Penguins don't think Brassard is a fit on their 3rd line, so they're likely going to move him and bring in a replacement 3C.
Edit: an idea I saw thrown out on another site is Brassard+ to Minnesota for Coyle. Minnesota needs more offensive talent, seeing how they're 24th in goals for this year, and they may potentially lose Staal this year to free agency. Being able to re-sign Brassard to be one of your top-6 centers may be a positive in the eyes of the Wild.
Jordan Staal at $3M for the next four years and you'd be willing to give up a 2nd? Where do we sign....
I'd probably say that Staal isn't possible for anything above $5 million. Ideally, it's closer to $4.5 or $4.75 million.
I don't think you'd get much resistance to the Penguins adding to get some salary retention. The issue is I feel like Carolina's management will have a much higher view on Staal's value, if they even want to trade him. What is worth noting is that JR has inquired about Staal before as GM for the Penguins, I think you heard rumors about him asking Carolina about his availability in 2017. When he was asked about it on a radio show, he basically said "I can't talk about players on other teams, but I love Staal", which basically confirms those rumors.
I'd be fine with doing Brassard, Jarry and a 1st for Staal at anything below $4.75 million.
Dude, I'd probably give up more, but I am a huge Jordan Staal fan.
That being said, the Canes could get a much better deal if they want to move Staal. Does he have a NTC?
Yes he does, a full NMC, so he choses where he goes. My guess if the Canes wanted to move him, and I really have no idea, Pittsburgh is probably the only place he'd green light.Dude, I'd probably give up more, but I am a huge Jordan Staal fan.
That being said, the Canes could get a much better deal if they want to move Staal. Does he have a NTC?
It's not worth flaming you for, but I agree that Brassard isn't a good base for Coyle. The base would really be whatever the plus is, with Brassard as a fill-in for the rest of the year: Fenton gets an asset for Coyle without totally flushing the season down the drain. The prospect of extending Brassard doesn't add much value when we're talking about a UFA, though.
There are probably Wild fans that would take a 1st + Brassard for Coyle so it's not crazy, but I think it's a bad idea. Coyle's younger and should be a safer bet to extend, possibly for less than Brassard. And overall I just like Coyle's game better.
So then why isn't he a fit for #3c? Is Dreger suggesting he's a better fit for a #2C? Why replace him with a #3c if he's a better option? Is starting a little less in the O-zone really that much a problem where you would want to downgrade to a real #3c?
Take out Jarry add a 2nd or LW/C prospect and we'll retain to 4.5.
Staal @ 4.5 for Brassard 1st other piece