I don't see any reason to not have Lindstein and Stenberg at camp this year. Let them work with the coaches (whomever they may be) and players. Familiarize themselves with the organization and give them a taste before assigning them back to Sweden.
Because it would screw up that exact same familiarization process for their Swedish team. The one they’ll be playing on all year.I don't see any reason to not have Lindstein and Stenberg at camp this year. Let them work with the coaches (whomever they may be) and players. Familiarize themselves with the organization and give them a taste before assigning them back to Sweden.
Yeah, since they have almost no chance to make club it probably doesn't make sense to keep them out of their Swedish camps. The following year I would expect we want both in NA for camp, as spending the 25-26 season in NA seems like logical step. we can always assign them back home if we feel ahl ain't best route at any point, but next year in shl and following year here is likely the anticipated path for both.Because it would screw up that exact same familiarization process for their Swedish team. The one they’ll be playing on all year.
It’s doable. It happens. There’s pros to it but there’s also cons of them missing part/all of their camp there as well as the beginning of their season there.
In terms of skill? Absolutely. In terms of impact? TBD. Torpo isn’t very skilled but he brings other things that help him make an impact. TBD what Pekarcik will bring in the pro game.Does Pekarcik have more upside than Torpchenko? just thinking where he might fit in down the road?
I would say yes. I've seen quite a few games. He can be inconsistent like every junior player. He did battle some injuries. When he is on, he is hard after the puck, plays the body, and has a gift for making a solid pass forehand or backhand. He often played out by the point on the power play just for the purpose of setting up one time passes. Dubuque has a defender and a winger that are pretty good at shooting off of one timers. Pekarcik had a ton of assists because of it. As a Blues fan, I can see him playing with Dvorsky as he excels at giving accurate flat one time passes (to Mr. Short Side) and his skating and puck pursuit would make up for Dvorsky's okay skating. He will get the puck and win board battles. He could just end up being a bottom six banger with some playmaking ability. I like his game.Does Pekarcik have more upside than Torpchenko? just thinking where he might fit in down the road?
I'm hesitant to say Dean will secure a spot during training camp, but I can't see a scenario where Bolduc isn't starting with the team come October. Everything he did was very impressive for a player as young as he is and comparing what was said about him the previous year (and 2023 training camp), I was even more impressed. I think his overall awareness on the ice is sneaky good, he makes the simple play instead of doing too much, he clearly has offensive skill as shown towards the end of the season, and defensively he was significantly better than what I expected. Provided he doesn't take a massive step back, I think he has every chance to lose a top 9 spot this year.With Bolduc and Dean getting a taste of the NHL, do you expect them to take another step each? I was very impressed with both.
Don't necessarily agree or disagree with what you're saying. As you said, it's important to note that he was a 1st round pick and does have offensive skill along with good two-way play, but you don't want to relegate him to the 4th line for his career if he has potential other places. On one hand, I think it's a smarter decision to start him in Springfield and let him develop his game as the top center on that team, however I don't think him playing on the 4th line is going to kill his offensive potential. We've seen it with lots of young players in the league, you start them on the 4th line and let them learn to grind out possession and puck battles, and slowly open them up to more offensive chances on the 3rd and potentially 2nd line. I think if he earns a 4th line role, then let him go at it. But if he slows down, then you can let him adjust in the AHL then bring him back up. I think there is enough offense on the bottom lines that you can get him 20 ish points which is perfectly fine for a 21 year old. Honestly, it's really up to him if he's ready or not; I think he'll make the Blues' decision for them.I would 100% much rather have Dean in Springfield then as our 4C next year. The kid has offensive skills, but they need some more time to develop. I don't want him to start with a mindset of being a 4th line grinder. I'd start him in the top 6 in Springfield and make it clear to him that we want to see him driving offense while playing tough matchups against opposing teams. The kid is a former 1st round pick, just because he's more advanced on the defensive side of the puck doesn't mean we should simply slot him in as a bottom 6 type and ask him to play a grinding game with the Toropchenko's of the world.
This is where I’m at too.Don't necessarily agree or disagree with what you're saying. As you said, it's important to note that he was a 1st round pick and does have offensive skill along with good two-way play, but you don't want to relegate him to the 4th line for his career if he has potential other places. On one hand, I think it's a smarter decision to start him in Springfield and let him develop his game as the top center on that team, however I don't think him playing on the 4th line is going to kill his offensive potential. We've seen it with lots of young players in the league, you start them on the 4th line and let them learn to grind out possession and puck battles, and slowly open them up to more offensive chances on the 3rd and potentially 2nd line. I think if he earns a 4th line role, then let him go at it. But if he slows down, then you can let him adjust in the AHL then bring him back up. I think there is enough offense on the bottom lines that you can get him 20 ish points which is perfectly fine for a 21 year old. Honestly, it's really up to him if he's ready or not; I think he'll make the Blues' decision for them.
I was just thinking of writing this. Dean needs time to develop his offensive game. I think he will develop better if we are patient and he gets AHL time.I would 100% much rather have Dean in Springfield then as our 4C next year. The kid has offensive skills, but they need some more time to develop. I don't want him to start with a mindset of being a 4th line grinder. I'd start him in the top 6 in Springfield and make it clear to him that we want to see him driving offense while playing tough matchups against opposing teams. The kid is a former 1st round pick, just because he's more advanced on the defensive side of the puck doesn't mean we should simply slot him in as a bottom 6 type and ask him to play a grinding game with the Toropchenko's of the world.
Barbashev also had plenty of time marinating in the AHL (a full, a half and a partial season).This is where I’m at too.
I can see both sides and don’t have a huge preference on where he starts. But playing on the 4th line didn’t hinder guys like Neighbours and Barbashev, and those are the types that I view as having similar games as Dean. I’d be more than happy if he goes the Barbashev route and becomes a really effective bottom 6’er before he eventually blossoms more offensively. Nothing wrong with that.