Oscar Lindberg
Registered User
Yeah I’m just not seeing it with him eitherOh, and Georgiev just isn't very good part 26.
He’s gonna be a very good backup but he’s not some golden goose
Yeah I’m just not seeing it with him eitherOh, and Georgiev just isn't very good part 26.
Without depth, these winnable games are lost too much for us to be a playoff team. 2 picks in the mid 1st isn't bad. Hopefully Bobrov has more oversight on drafting some skilled forwards. This team is nothing more than our top 3 forwards and top 2 defensemen and top goalie.
he's not Shesty so throw him in the garbage? He's 24 and has played some very good games behind some very bad defense.Yeah I’m just not seeing it with him either
He’s gonna be a very good backup but he’s not some golden goose
Only Sith deal in absolutes, my dude
it was a really good game. one we’d win most of the time
the blues scored two flukes but we were outstanding otherwise. it happens but this game probably cost us a playoff spot
Sell off what? Kreider? Strome? DeAngelo? That moves us backwards not forwards. Maybe they should have traded Fast but you know what i'm not going to cry about that lost 3rd round pick.without depth, they aren’t winnable.
Still wondering why we didn’t have a sell off at the deadline b/c they are kids/pretenders not contenders.
Without depth, these winnable games are lost too much for us to be a playoff team. 2 picks in the mid 1st isn't bad. Hopefully Bobrov has more oversight on drafting some skilled forwards. This team is nothing more than our top 3 forwards and top 2 defensemen and top goalie.
Kakko at least was getting some chances tonight and is good in front. But yeah Gauthier would be my first choice too, but I just mean any of them over Lemieux.How are you better with KAKKO out there over Lemieux as far as board play goes? Lemieux battles hard and will work tirelessly to get the puck back. Kakko doesn’t have that yet. Gauthier is a guy I thought he was going to come out with. He had him on the ice listening during the timeout.
???I disagree. If you look at the teams they've lost to recently, they're all the ones in playoff position. Playing well and losing is meaningless when the game is on the line. They don't hand you two points for "out playing" another team. You get the 2 by scoring more goals than them. This is also a team they've lost to earlier in the season.
When this team can consistently hang with the big boys, then they'll be ready. But that's very clearly not the case here.
You are not ANYWHERE NEAR READY to espouse your ridiculous explanation here.What's dumb is you thinking a participation award for playing a game well and losing is somehow an indication of something other than the team who has consistently played better all season won and the team that is young and rebuilding lost.
They got the 2 points, not us.
Was thinking this all game.That team is so f***ing boring.
Take your Stanley Cup and choke on it, I have no respect for teams like that.
The people complaining now are the same people chest trumping when we give up 80 scoring chances and win.
It's so short-sighted.
So do the NHL standings. Only Winners get the 2 points. "Outplaying" a team is a losers rally cry.
Was thinking this all game.
Glad we’re building the type of team we’re building.
Facts.I can feel you being in your element tonight.
they're a very meat and potatoes team yeah. Can't argue with the results but it doesn't make for good games.That team is so f***ing boring.
Take your Stanley Cup and choke on it, I have no respect for teams like that.
Works hard, plays clean, probably has done what he's asked all year, and Quinn isn't coaching to win every game like it's the last game forever. If you don't put guys out to outperform their current slots, they will never outperform their current slot.Someone needs to find out what blackmail Lemmy has on Quinn. I mean this has to be the only reason as to why DQ keeps putting Lemieux out there on the 2nd PP and when we empty the net. Has to be. Its inexcusable.
Annnnd attacking grammar means you've run out of points to make. Later!You are not ANYWHERE NEAR READY to espouse your ridiculous explanation here.
"Not Anywhere near ready".....such drivel. Maybe clarify your adjectives there, cause this doesn't mean what you think it means.