LeBrun: Blue Jackets rejected to trade 2024 4OA for Chicago's 2025 1st round pick unprotected

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,519
59,294
Chicago was trying to accelerate their build by pushing forward lottery picks into their system. Makes sense...

But also looking back at the organizational damage Chicago had to inflict on themselves to even get themselves into Bedard territory, offloading guys like Dylan Strome, Brandon Hagel, Kirby Dach, they really had to take many steps backwards...
 

Guttersniped

Satan’s Wallpaper
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,874
51,332
I thought I heard at the time that the Habs could still win the lottery as staying put didn't mean a win.

Stupid language.

This has clearer language, and says teams can’t advance twice via the lottery, so staying put doesn’t mean a win.

IMG_0520.jpeg


 

HawksDub89

Registered User
Apr 17, 2019
1,754
1,923
Would have been a gamble for Columbus. Even if Chicago finishes with the worst record, they'd still have a 55.7% chance (assuming Tankathon did its calculation correctly) of picking #3. I haven't done a deep dive into the 2025 crop so I don't know if guys like Frondell/Misa/McQueen are clearly ahead of Lindstrom at this point.

Closest I could think of was Chicago giving up the #4 pick in 1999 to Vancouver for Bryan McCabe and a 2000 1st. Brian Burke had to pay a premium and include a young NHL defender despite being the 2nd worst team in the NHL in 1998-99; Other variable being Atlanta starting in 1999 plus two more expansion teams for the 2000 Draft. Vancouver's 2000 1st would end up being 11th.

Chicago originally had hopes that he could be the ones to get both Sedins. But once Brian Burke declared that wouldn't trade out of #3, Chicago pivoted and traded #4 partly because they didn't want to gamble and get defaulted to Pavel Brendl.

I would say only Martone, Misa, Hagens and Schaefer are better prospects than Lindstrom. I’d definitely take him over Frondell

Not by much though, at the time I completely understand being intrigued with Lindstrom.
 

ThisIsMyAlibi

Fan of the worst organization in the NHL
Mar 16, 2010
1,918
1,347
Ohio
Disaster of a decision.

Lindstrom may never be able to stay healthy enough to be a pro hockey player. At the very least, there’s no way he goes in the top 10 if they had a redo. Passing up what might be the 1OA and is at minimum going to realistically be a top 5 pick is going to set that franchise back even more.
Yeah, tragic but very CBJ. Took a teenager with a bad back in the top 5.
 

ThisIsMyAlibi

Fan of the worst organization in the NHL
Mar 16, 2010
1,918
1,347
Ohio
Wayyyyy too early to be judging. Ridiculous.
Are most back surgeries successful?

Is having a partial disk removal as a teenager correlated with positive long-term outcomes?

does playing an elite level heavy contact sport predispose somebody with back issues to further back issues?

There were players of comparable skill and talent available. They elected to take the biggest medical red flag regardless.
 

SteelCityCannon

Registered User
Mar 25, 2017
687
1,316
Are most back surgeries successful?

Is having a partial disk removal as a teenager correlated with positive long-term outcomes?

does playing an elite level heavy contact sport predispose somebody with back issues to further back issues?

There were players of comparable skill and talent available. They elected to take the biggest medical red flag regardless.
It absolutely may come back to bite them. Calling it tragic 5 months after the kids drafted is a little much. Plenty of players have had this procedure.

I guess I'll put it this way. If he has the potential to become the player the Jackets think he can, it's still worth it. If he never plays and retires at 21 and Demidov becomes a god then it's a disaster. Way too early to tell now.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,835
35,500
40N 83W (approx)
It absolutely may come back to bite them. Calling it tragic 5 months after the kids drafted is a little much. Plenty of players have had this procedure.

I guess I'll put it this way. If he has the potential to become the player the Jackets think he can, it's still worth it. If he never plays and retires at 21 and Demidov becomes a god then it's a disaster. Way too early to tell now.
Oh, pish tosh. Why show restraint and reserve judgement when we can be vocally angry and bitter now?
 

kmwtrucks

Registered User
Mar 11, 2014
1,858
651
with the Blackhawks having the worst record in the league and the offer was there 1st and 2nd next year, and Cayden has had a second back surgery. I think if they could reverse that and do the trade now they would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,952
15,665
with the Blackhawks having the worst record in the league and the offer was there 1st and 2nd next year, and Cayden has had a second back surgery. I think if they could reverse that and do the trade now they would.
And the Jackets could have used those picks to acquire current nhl players if they wanted to. The value of the Hawks’ 2025 first (unprotected) would be extremely high.
 

Baksfamous112

Registered User
Jul 21, 2016
8,441
5,878
They did it for good reasons:

1) 1 year of development lost
2) You never know how the team will perform the next year
3) GMs have a life shelf. You don’t want to f*** up your job and give the ammo to the next guy coming up after you.
4) Cayden pick was irrelevant. Could have been Demidov and logic would have remained the same
 

kmwtrucks

Registered User
Mar 11, 2014
1,858
651
They did it for good reasons:

1) 1 year of development lost
2) You never know how the team will perform the next year
3) GMs have a life shelf. You don’t want to f*** up your job and give the ammo to the next guy coming up after you.
4) Cayden pick was irrelevant. Could have been Demidov and logic would have remained the same
I understand why they rejected it at the time. The issue is it looks like they made the wrong Decesion. would you rather have pick 1-3/4 in this coming draft. looks to be 3-4 high end forwards and 1 elite D. plus pick 32-34 or Cayden? Hagens, martone, Schafer, Misa frondell and another good propspect in the early 30's
 

Baksfamous112

Registered User
Jul 21, 2016
8,441
5,878
I understand why they rejected it at the time. The issue is it looks like they made the wrong Decesion. would you rather have pick 1-3/4 in this coming draft. looks to be 3-4 high end forwards and 1 elite D. plus pick 32-34 or Cayden? Hagens, martone, Schafer, Misa frondell and another good propspect in the early 30's
Of course I would but at the time of making the decision we didn’t have the information we had back then. For example, last year, Philly was supposed to be a bottom 3 team and overachieved and finished with the 12th pick. This year, everyone said Calgary would be a bottom 3 team yet they have a positive record after 25% of the season.

If Columbus makes that trade and Chicago go on a run this year then it’s a fireable offence for any GM in the league. Plus, as I said, if you make that trade, you lose 1 (precious) year of development for a top 5 pick. It doesn’t make any sense.

Now, we can talk about whether Lindstrom was the right pick or not at 4 but that’s a completely different topic
 

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,826
13,402
Canada
Are most back surgeries successful?

Is having a partial disk removal as a teenager correlated with positive long-term outcomes?

does playing an elite level heavy contact sport predispose somebody with back issues to further back issues?

There were players of comparable skill and talent available. They elected to take the biggest medical red flag regardless.
yes actually, it does have a high success rate
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad