Ive been very anti-Quinn basically since the hire but I do agree that he won’t be fired before the end of the season and probably not even then— and that’s exactly the problem. With way better coaching options out there, this absurd notion that Quinn is doing what he was hired to do is holding this organization back. This is about WINNING NHL. Hockey games. It’s that simple. Giving up 40 plus shots often, being last in most defensive metrics, refusing to tighten up in close games, having no recognizable defensive structure, near constant line juggling, mind numbing decisions with player usage, altering the power play during stretches it’s working, etc... are just the most obvious areas of concern. We also have his stubbornness, warring with officials and other traits that I don’t like but maybe others do. The biggest concern I have is what are these young guys learning right now? I believe they are learning losing ways. Compare that to Torts who has that Columbus team winning games despite being decimated by injuries. He has instilled a defense first technique, an obvious forecheck system( and I don’t watch many Columbus games but being at the game last night I could tell 3 shifts in exactly what he was doing as compared to Quinn’s system that over a year and a half in the best I can tell the system is one man hard on the puck, second forward pressure the lane, third forward high) and it’s clear what coaching does. Imagine Quinn coaching Columbus. You’d get a lot of “ well we just need more from these guys,” after loses type press conferences.
Coaching in the NHL matters. If the Rangers could get an established NHL coach I know the results would be better! My concern is this town runs established guys out of here at an alarming rate and may have burnt that bridge with the next coaching hire.