"Distinct kicking motion" in Jets / Stars game

Status
Not open for further replies.

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Sponsor
Nov 15, 2020
18,054
37,902
1747004015191.png


Reviewed for 7 minutes to say good goal because it hit the goalies stick

 
To continue my thoughts from the GDT, this is the way they ruled it:

A) It was a distinct kicking motion that played the puck towards the net, however that's legal in all zones unless it causes the puck to be propelled into the net.
B) It did not "deflect" off Hellebuyck's stick into the net, it was "propelled" by Hellebuyck's stick into the net (the rules use the verb "propel" all over the place to be distinct from "deflecting" the puck. This renders the ruling that the puck was kicked irrelevant.

I actually disagree on both accounts, however when you reverse it that way... it still results in a good goal.
 
The referee’s explanation is baffling because there’s no need to consider the goalie’s role.

The puck visibly deflects off Petrovic’s stick on the way to the net (or more accurately, he uses his stick to direct its flight) which makes the goal valid under 49.2.ii regardless of what the goalie did.
 
This has happened before with pucks off gloves

It happened with quick

As soon as you use the term “propelled”
It cancels out everything before that
 
? He didn't even kick it at the net. How's it his fault that Hellebuyck decides to whack it into his own net? If he hadn't done so, there would have been nothing wrong with his play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ratbath
I want the Jets to win so the Stars will want to change things up a bit along with likely having to sell players for cap reasons and maybe the Habs can jump in on that.

But that's a goal. If Helly didn't touch it it wasnt going in.

Yes, I get youre not going to let a puck go in front, nor be thinking of that, but he knocked it in himself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Ad

    Ad