spockBokk
Registered User
- Sep 8, 2013
- 7,490
- 18,978
Blake will receive $775,000 at the NHL level in 2023-24 and $832,500 at the NHL level in 2024-25 and 2025-26. He will receive $80,000 at the American Hockey League (AHL) level for all three seasons, and the deal will include a signing bonus of $277,500.
Good now to resume breathingHell yeah
Sooooo Necas?For his sake and yours, I hope he makes it, because he has the potential to be an exciting player. You'll shake your head at some of the stuff he tries, then shake it again when some of it actually works.
Or Svech.Sooooo Necas?
Well he’s got good lateral ability and he scoots through tight space pretty quickly, and some would say the lateral ability would matter more than straight line speed. He may not win sprints down the ice but inside the zone off a cycle I bet he can be a handful when he develops a bit.Without size or blazing speed, it's tough to make it. That's why he went in the fourth round. How far can guile, hands, vision, and edges take you? That's what we'll find out. But a home run of a fourth round pick, sitting next to Gauthier and Celebrini at the Hobey ceremony.
Without size or blazing speed, it's tough to make it. That's why he went in the fourth round. How far can guile, hands, vision, and edges take you? That's what we'll find out. But a home run of a fourth round pick, sitting next to Gauthier and Celebrini at the Hobey ceremony.
It’s a fair comparison including the difference in that junk in the trunk. Skinner had a very strong base that I don’t think Blake has, not yet anyway.Skinner was a guy that didn't have a lot of size and didn't have blazing speed, but made it with guile, hands, vision, phenomenal edges, a knack for finding soft spots, and an ability to score.
Skinner was stockier than Blake though as he was 5'10", 187lbs at the draft combine, he was incredibly strong on his skates and he worked his ass off with Gary Roberts even before being drafted.
Blake's listed weight at UND if 5'11", 173lbs, but I'm not sure how accurate that is.
If he is willing to work hard, Jarvis is a good road map to follow comparing year 3 versus year one. Beyond himself, RBA has a bunch of guys on the roster that are workout fiends to use as a role model.It’s a fair comparison including the difference in that junk in the trunk. Skinner had a very strong base that I don’t think Blake has, not yet anyway.
Generally I agree, but I think there's a chance FUS could. From what I could tell, like Jarvis, he plays the type of game that fits with Rod and won't "hurt" the team. He's also already playing against grown men in a high end league. I'm by no means saying he will, just that I could see it happening with him.Nice. I still think that Blake, Nadeau, and FUS won't see a regular spot in the lineup next year. They would be better served playing regular minutes in the "A" and maybe a cup of coffee in the show if we get some injuries. Extended time playing 4th line minutes will help them learn NHL defense, but could stunt their ceiling.
We look a little smarter today than on the Guentzel trade. Morrow and Blake ended up signing this year, so we do in fact keep our better college prospects. On the other hand, Koivunen has tore it up in the playoffs, so we look a little stupider too.
So does that mean we only have him under ELC for 2 years then?The deal is like morrow’s. Will burn a year this year.
FUS also was on the team for a long look.Generally I agree, but I think there's a chance FUS could. From what I could tell, like Jarvis, he plays the type of game that fits with Rod and won't "hurt" the team. He's also already playing against grown men in a high end league. I'm by no means saying he will, just that I could see it happening with him.
technically no, he is under contract right now. Does these last 3 games of season where he is under contract really count? no.So does that mean we only have him under ELC for 2 years then?
They are still required to play 10 games under the SPC in any league to get a season of professional experience for the Free Agency Purposes, and our AHL situation is tricky. I don't think they can avoid the 10.2(c).hey @Lempo we probably see Blake and Morrow get one game this season so that they can start their professional experience to prevent the risk of being a 10.2(c) guy, dont you think?
For the purposes of this Section 10.2(a), a Player aged 18 or 19 earns a
year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or more NHL Games
in a given NHL Season, and a Player aged 20 or older (or who turns 20
between September 16 and December 31 of the year in which he signs his
first SPC) earns a year of professional experience by playing ten (10) or
more Professional Games under an SPC in a given League Year.
I believe any player 20 or older only has to play 1 game to count for professional experienceThey are still required to play 10 games under the SPC in any league to get a season of professional experience for the Free Agency Purposes, and our AHL situation is tricky. I don't think they can avoid the 10.2(c).
I did quote the CBA bit there saying 10 professional games [in any league], but I'm not gonna ridicule your beliefs.I believe any player 20 or older only has to play 1 game to count for professional experience