This! Have these 6 teams play against each other once (that's 5 games per team) and then the top two teams will face each other in the Finals. That would be simple and perfect.
So no Kopitar in the tournament?
Doing that would mean the return of famous play-by-play announcer Mark from Saskatchewan:I'd love for this to turn into an 8 real nation tournament.
Spitballing here but grandfather in the nations from 2016 (Canada, Sweden, Finland, Czech Republic, US). That's 6. Then have two stages of qualifiers for the remaining top 26 IIHF ranked teams to fill the field. Teams like Switzerland, Slovakia, Germany, and Belarus would get byes from the first stage.
Broadcasting those early qualifiers on youtube or the depths of the internet would be awesome.
To me only one format works. 8 teams, nations only, no gimmicks. Preferably with pre-tournament qualification, but not vital.
I think hockey has grown beyond the point where you can only have 6 teams.
.
With the Yanks being completely humiliated and dominated, they would fight a future Team NA vigorously.
USA getting embarrassed was likely the best thing that could have happened to ensure nations only going forward. I doubt we see this format again.
I thought so as well.
Better format:
Canada
USA
Sweden
Russia
Finland
Czech Republic
Slovakia
Switzerland
Alternate format:
Canada
USA
Sweden
Russia
Finland
Czech Republic
hahaha very good, or...Four teams one game
Team Kalmar union + Finland, Team Soviet, Team NA(USA + snubs from Canada), Team Canada.
First period
Team Kalmar union v. Canada
Second period
Team Soviet v. Canada
Third period
Team NA v. Canada
Time to de-throne those maple syrup donut eating gods of hockey.
I would honestly be ok with this format again, if they gave Canada and US the right to select first and could pick all the players they want. I don't think, then, the U24 team is a bad idea. Quite the contrary, it proved to be a great idea, praised by McLellan, or even Babcock, who says that whoever came up with this is a genius.
But going with countries only is a "can't go wrong" type of an option.
I loved the current format, but would like to see 2 more teams added so there are more round robin games. Here's what I would like to see for the next tournament...
Canada A
Canada B (they are good enough to be in the tournament so why not?)
USA
NA youngsters
Sweden
Russia
Finland
Europe combined (adds Czech)
Also would add a rule whereby you can play for Canada or USA if you 23 or under if you already played on team NA in this tournament.
Let's say the modern NHL doesn't. And they don't. This is how bad this format in 2016 was and I can't believe I am saying this but I will.................this would NEVER have happened with Alan Eagleson. Alright, there, even a crook who was all about himself knew how to make the proper format. That is what this format reduced me to say. That and the fact I cheered for the Russians to beat North America just so we can have a great game with some meaning and a historic rival.
So there you go, I long for Alan Eagleson's organization in this tournament and I cheered for the Russians against the gimmick team. Yeah, the NHL didn't get it right this time. Fortunately we can still have some meaningful hockey the next few days.
Pool A: Canada East, USA, Czechs, Europe
Pool B: Canada West, Russia, Sweden, Finland