saskriders
Can't Hold Leads
This clearly would have been Slovakia before today, but now that it no longer applies to them which country would you say is the best hockey country without a medal at the Olympics. My vote would be for Latvia.
This clearly would have been Slovakia before today, but now that it no longer applies to them which country would you say is the best hockey country without a medal at the Olympics. My vote would be for Latvia.
Did West Germany ever win a medal?
Historically? Let's just take a look at their three best rankings:
Poland 4 - 6 - 6
France 5 - 6 - 6
Belarus 4 - 7 - 9
Austria 6 - 7 - 7
Belgium 7 - 7 - 8
Italy 7 - 8 - 9
Norway 8 - 8 - 9
Japan 8 - 9 - 9
Romania 7 - 8 - 12
Latvia 8 - 9 - 11
Slovenia 7 - 9 - x
Kazakhstan 8 - 9 - x
Denmark 7 - x - x
;-)
What about Poland? They have a long history of participation. They iced some decent teams in the 70's and 80's. They produced NHLers. Are they not ahead of Latvia, with their relatively short history in the international game?
Just two . Oliwa who was a grinder and Czerkawski who is their best player and unsurprisingly born in the deep south. Latvia is far ahead on that score. There are more clubs now in Poland and rinks. Time will tell if their juniors improve. Hopefully. They should be far stronger. You see all the players from North America with Polish heritage like Borowiecki, Oleksiak, Werenski and some in Sweden too. It's just the domestic scene in Poland needs a lot of work to catch up to Latvia.
Teams are still import laden and arenas as in the UK multipurpose rather than hockey dedicated. It's a sleeping giant if the giant can be woken.
Oliwa who was a grinder
Yes. Bronze from Innsbruck 1976.
Ice hockey at the Olympic Games - Wikipedia
Latvia seems to be correct answer.
And the whole "West Germany" is mostly a misnomer promoted by foreign sources, the team competed as Federal Republic of Germany which in turn never ceased to exist.
Right. "West Germany" is probably used only because it's shorter and easier to use on a table.
For sure one major reason, and easier for many to comprehend. Today we have Korea and DPR Korea teams in hockey, but many would rather use South Korea and North Korea instead despite both names being longer than those officially recognized by the IIHF.
But especially initially there were also various reasons related to political recognition and non-recognition. For example the term East Germany was seen as contentious because the Federal Republic didn't recognize the post-war Soviet and Polish annexation of formerly German eastern territories until 1970 (de facto) or 1990 (de jure). So when such geographical term was used in Germany to refer to the territory of the Democratic Republic especially until the late 1960s it was usually Mitteldeutschland, Central Germany. Conversely, abroad the preferential usage of West Germany and East Germany initially allowed the users to frame the territorial existence of the two German states in a new way. So in some aspects perhaps even resembling the Chinese Taipei issue of today a little bit.
Nowadays that viewpoint is of course completely obsolete, and the main source of confusion today is the common misconception that West Germany and East Germany would both have ceased to exist uniting to one new Germany, whereas in reality the so-called West simply absorbed the East and continued its own existence as before.
To be pedantic though, the IOC does have different country codes for West Germany (FRG) and re-unified Germany (GER), though the IOC considers all West Germany records to be part of Germany's history.
Latvia today is very much like Finland in the 1980s; people are very passionate about the game and every now and then they can upset the bigger hockey powers but in the big picture they just aren't good enough. At least not yet.
Yes it does, but also some other existing countries received new codes in 1992. For example the Netherlands became NED instead of HOL.