- Feb 13, 2012
- 28,686
- 13,459
Inspired by the Best Harry Potter Film thread. Vote for the best book in the poll, then rank all 7 books.
*Sorcerer's Stone, not Philosopher's Stone
You heathens
I hate J.K. Rowling. Yessssss.
No. It's Philosopher's. It's always been Philosopher's. American publishing companies changed the name for whatever reason.
No. It's Philosopher's. It's always been Philosopher's. American publishing companies changed the name for whatever reason.
It's because they thought American children were unintelligent and wouldn't want to read a book with "Philosopher" in the title
I am a hundred percent true that this is not true. The unintelligent part. The rest could be.
Scholastic (who bought the US rights to the books) asked Rowling to change as they though kids wouldn't buy a book with 'Philosopher' in the title. At the time since it was her first book she agreed, she later regretted this decision.
I've always considered Prisoner of Azkaban my favorite, but I just realized for the first time that that could've had some to do with the fact that it was the first "new" story to me. I saw the first two movies (when they were the only two movies) before I started reading the books, so the stories in the first two books weren't new to me. Prisoner of Azkaban was totally new, though, so I was excited to turn every page.
Goblet of Fire would likely be my second favorite. What was exciting about it is that it was just so large of a book. By the time that you'd read as much as was in 'Azkaban', you were only halfway through. It really sunk you into the universe is fleshed it out. It was really meaty and satisfying. It was also just broken up really well with the various stages, so it was long, but didn't drag.
After those two, I'm not sure how I'd rank them. It's hard for me to rank the first two, since I barely have memory of reading them, owing to having seen the movies first and to them being so short. 5-7 also sort of run together for me, probably largely due to their movies all being so similar. Unlike the movies, though, there isn't any book of the series that I didn't really enjoy. If I had to choose a least-liked, though, I'd probably go with Deathly Hallows, because it suffered from predictability and the sadness that the ride was about to be over.
It's one book, there's no part 1 and 2.I was actually gong to make this thread
Goblet of Fire
Order of the Phoenix
Half Blood Prince
Prisoner of Azkaban
Deathly Hallows
Philosophers Stone
Chamber of Secrets
Would have Hallows higher but for whatever reason I took a year long break between parts 1 and 2 reading it so that just left me unimpressed.
It's one book, there's no part 1 and 2.