To those whom it may concern:
YOU MUST HAVE CAP INFO IN YOUR ROSTER. COME ON.
To
Niklas Kronwall
Jimmy Howard
Both 50% retained
To
Silfverberg
1st 2014 OTT
1st 2014 ANA
Please tell me this is a veto
Neither deal is veto-worthy.
If anyone wants Tampa, feel free to take them. I'll stay if you guys need me but I am way too busy to play a full game.
If anyone wants Tampa, feel free to take them. I'll stay if you guys need me but I am way too busy to play a full game.
i think thee gm might want a team
Any non homer could tell you that's an awful, awful, awful deal for Detroit.
Within the rules. Deal with it.
Lopsided trades aren't within the rules.
If it isn't lopsided in the league's mind then it isn't against the rules.
It wasn't vetoed so clearly it can't be that bad right? Also, having a trade vetoed is within the rules. You just have to change the original trade.
When a deal is deemed too lopsided or one sided the deal will be put on hold. The league will hold a meeting and decide, with the GMs in question, how to work the trade out
Almost every single person aside from you and Ben think it's veto worthy.
Also based upon the hypothetical DD, how exactly is having a deal vetoed not against the rules? The OP states
If it were legal it would go through without any problem.
Also, we all know how steep the price was merely 2 days ago for Datsyuk, so may think you did this to spite the league in light of the Sedin ruling.
To those whom it may concern:
YOU MUST HAVE CAP INFO IN YOUR ROSTER. COME ON.
Na, he did it to spite you lol.
So all the talk about morals and integrity was ********? Colour me surprised.
Almost every single person aside from you and Ben think it's veto worthy.
Also based upon the hypothetical DD, how exactly is having a deal vetoed not against the rules? The OP states
If it were legal it would go through without any problem.
Also, we all know how steep the price was merely 2 days ago for Datsyuk, so may think you did this to spite the league in light of the Sedin ruling.