To Pitt: Mackinnon
To Avs: Trouba + Maatta + Sprong +Pitt 1st
To Wpg: Zadorov+ Avs 2nd
Ugly for Winnipeg. Trouba is worth more than Zadorov + 2nd. Not a well thought out proposals at all.
To Pitt: Mackinnon
To Avs: Trouba + Maatta + Sprong +Pitt 1st
To Wpg: Zadorov+ Avs 2nd
OP does not speak for all Avs fans.
It's less than 10 games in underneath a coach who is implementing a brand new system. You can see the processes are far better. The wins will come. Get off the ledge.
But firesales really happen in the NHL? A team trading away most of their core pieces simultaneously because they are not good enough?
Pacioretty
Beaulieu
2017 1st
for
Mackinnon
IMO value between Pacioretty and Mackinnon isn't a 1st and Beaulieu
Im expecting playoffs maybe first round exit and if that happens, will the OP still stand by this? My point is exactly that, that it's too early to panic, we haven't started bad overall. Growing pains
Was coming to saying this
Mackinnon has had 3 seasons under his belt and so far has never looked elite and this year his play has been mediocre. At some point the aura of being first fades off.
Jaden Schwartz + Jake Walman for Nathan Mackinnon.
The Avs are currently in a playoff spot
Rantanen and Siemens for Tarasenko.
You mean how it's been 8 games and MacKinnon only has 6 points? Yeah super mediocre.
Remember how Duchene didn't score til December last year and still put up 30 goals?
The season is young..
Schwartz has two 55+ point seasons in the NHL and Walman is a top prospect unlike Siemens.
You're missing the point.. Your proposed trade does nothing for the Avs and doesn't fill a need or a want for the Avs.
Rantanen, Duchene, Landeskog, and MacKinnon won't be moved. Especially for pieces that are either lateral moves or don't fill current needs.
EJ, Zadorov, Barrie, and Bigras are likely the cornerstones of the Avs defense. However I could see Bigras being moved for an equivalent wing prospect.
You literally could have just said that instead of making an awful counter proposal. Not sure how I'm supposed to figure out that my proposal doesn't fill a need or want when all you did was post a counter proposal with no actual substance.
So the Avs are set on defense, center, and apparently wing as well. What exactly is the need/want from the Avs then?
courtesy, civility, and ... ya never know, we might agree on something!Why should we give you thoughts when you clearly didn't think about this?
all of that is regardless of the question of how good is the valueLegend has really no insight to the Avs. He barely knows his own team he cheers for.
Avs ARE fine. It's not game 81. It's not even game 10. Their new coach is fine. They're a much better team right now than they were last year.