I've never liked this argument of playoffs required. If Kucherov wins the Ross and is outscoring the next closest on his team by a crazy margin he deserves the Hart. Full stop. Now if Kuch doesn't win the Ross, then sure, the debate is there.
MCDavid, MacK, and even Matthews all have a reasonable claim to the Hart. I'd even put Q. Hughes in the convo at this point in the season. Still too early to say, but this has been a great NHL season for individual players stories so far.
With respect to Matthews - he is clearly the best goal scorer of this generation. He might well outscore Ovi when it is all said and done he's that good. Toronto is lucky to have him.
That’s a fair way to look at it
I just think there’s only so much you can do if you don’t make the playoffs. If you help your team go from a say bottom 8 team vs the 18-20th place team then idk if you really were as valuable to your team as say someone like Mcdavid who not only helped his team claw back into the playoffs, but also a top 10 team. mackinnon is scoring at a somewhat similar rate on a top 5 team. Matthews scoring 25% of his teams goals on a top 10 team.
Even if I don’t believe kucherov should win the hart if he doesn’t make the playoffs, this isn’t a situation where he’d “rob” anyone by winning it anyways per say, but I do believe his case becomes weaker than if he does make the playoffs. And in a race that’s as strong as this one, that could be enough for someone else to jump him
But yea this will probably be one of the better hart trophy races, the past couple of years it’s been a two or one man race and a couple dark horses but right now we have a solid 4-5 guys each deserving and a couple other dark horses for at least votes.