That my statement being correct had nothing to do with the reasoning you suggested.
It's not a matter of opinion. You falsely suggested my statement was made because of the 2019-2020 season. It was not. My statement was true because of the 2016-2017 season, which is within the past 5 years. Even the poster you quoted, who was actually part of the discussion, acknowledged this, and admitted the mistake.I disagree
It's not a matter of opinion. You falsely suggested the statement was made because of the 2019-2020 season. It was not. My statement was true because of the 2016-2017 season, which is within the past 5 years. Even the poster you quoted, who was actually part of the discussion, acknowledged this, and admitted the mistake.
The original statement in question was that "Its been over 5 years since he appear in 50 games".Of course it was. That wasn't the point of my post.
The original statement in question was that "Its been over 5 years since he appear in 50 games".
My response was "It has not been over 5 years", since he appeared in 50 games in 2016-2017, and that is within the past 5 years.
A third individual initially thought that I was incorrect, but then acknowledged his mistake of double counting 2017-2018, and confirmed that I was correct.
Your statement, responding to him, had two parts. The first part was an inflammatory comment about me personally. The 2nd part was about the 2019-2020 season, which factually had nothing to do with why my statement was correct, and the original referenced statement by Mess was wrong.
Yes you proved Mess wrong, it was 5 years, not OVER 5 years. Well done.
Florida looked pretty impressive vs Tampa in the first round.
Percentage of team games started, last 3 years in reverse order
TBL: Vasilevskiy 75%, 74%, 65% / Elliot 46%, 39%, 28%
FLA: Bobrovsky 54%, 69%, 74% / Knight 5%, 0%, 0%
TOR: Mrazek 21%, 54%, 49% / Campbell 39%, 37%, 31%
BOS: Ullmark 36%, 49%, 41% / Swayman 18%, 0%, 0%
We clearly need a legit starter like Bobrovsky.
Did they really? Their only good game was game 5 in that series imo.Florida looked pretty impressive vs Tampa in the first round.
The only team that looked at all good against Tampa was the Islanders, for the second year in a row.Did they really? Their only good game was game 5 in that series imo.
The game they won in OT they were down 5-3 in and it wasn't pretty on both sides.
If it was the Leafs in that series I highly doubt we would be saying they played well.
1. Tampa
2. Florida
3. Boston
4. Toronto
5. Ottawa
6. Montreal
7. Detroit
8. Buffalo
I'm not arguing that Florida doesn't deserve to be considered a good team this year.
I'm just pointing out the flawed logic in saying last year is completely meaningless and then putting Florida ahead of us in projections.
This core is younger and has proven more than the Panthers core has.
That Dubas shouldn’t be allowed to negotiate contracts ?What has the Leafs core proven?
G
Tampa didn't finish first in their still strong division, and I'm not picking them to this year as well.
1. Florida/Toronto
2. Florida/Toronto
3. Tampa Bay
4. Boston
5. Ottawa
6. Detroit
7. Montreal
8. Buffalo
That playoff hockey is not the same as regular season hockey and Gatorade commercials.What has the Leafs core proven?
There isn't a singular position that worries me about this team.
Only if we can overcome the "loser mentality" that's developed.....(has been a constant for some time)
I'll watch every game of the regular season... cheer for every win; But I'm over the regular season already.... prove it in the playoffs. Don't make it? Bye, trade em all. Don't show progression? Bye, trade em all.
Perfect.Eastern Conference is a killer...not going to be easy for any team.
Perfect.
Good test all year...and prove it in the post season.
Yup..had a better team last year (imo) and easier path. Moving on; prove it - with what we have , against stiffer competition, over a longer period of time.Good, because other than NJ, Buffalo and maybe Ottawa and Detroit, the Eastern conference is f ugly difficult.