Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 16,767
- 13,731
Totally disagreed. There is no way Wedgewood "was willing to play in Milwaukee". That is a red herring. He is an established NHL BUG, and he was fully expecting to be #2 in Nashville. There is some posthumous revision of history going on here. Trotz had no intention whatsoever of playing Askarov in Nashville. He signed Wedgewood to be the new #2. We should know by now not to trust any words that come out of Trotz's mouth, right?I don't think it was because Wedgewood was cheaper, I think it was because Wedgewood was willing to play in Milwaukee and Lankinen wasn't. I don't even think he traded Wedgewood because he sucked, he traded him because Colorado offered a younger guy they liked.
That Wedgewood contract also worked out that most of the cap hit could be buried.
The real mistake was giving Saros that contract early. I think Askarov wants out regardless of the Wedgewood signing.
Askarov's camp correctly sussed this out.
There were multiple errors made on the whole goaltending issue. Giving Saros the contract extension early was certainly the worst. Acquiescing to Askarov's trade request was probably the next worst. Both of those choices were totally unnecessary. But then past them, thinking that signing Wedgewood was better than retaining Lankinen was also a bad read. They definitely intended to keep Wedgewood in the NHL, though. Anything contrary to that is some ass-covering revisionism - oh sure, if Askarov totally outplayed him and stole the show, they could have doubled back on things. But they definitely didn't convince Wedgewood to sign with us by telling him he might end up in Milwaukee. That definitely could not have happened... for all that he sucked briefly out of the gate for us, he has a better reputation around the league than that.