I usually don't like trading down but I am not confident in the Rangers NOT going off the board with our Skjei pick.
Maybe Anaheim would trade up and include their second to move up 5-6 slots? Maybe the Sharks would with their Tampa pick???
Just saying if someone like Jarvis, Gunler, Zary or Mysak was still available at 22ish and they pick a Smilanic or Cuylle who would probably still be on the board in the second round.What is going off the board at 22-24? There are so many good options at that point, Were Chytil, Miller and Lundkvist so bad as ‘off-the board’ picks?
I usually don't like trading down but I am not confident in the Rangers NOT going off the board with our Skjei pick.
Maybe Anaheim would trade up and include their second to move up 5-6 slots? Maybe the Sharks would with their Tampa pick???
Where’s hall signing? Calgary?
Montreal will definitely be trying if none of their new offer sheets don't work outWhere’s hall signing? Calgary?
Just saying if someone like Jarvis, Gunler, Zary or Mysak was still available at 22ish and they pick a Smilanic or Cuylle who would probably still be on the board in the second round.
Something to keep in mind is that this might be a draft where there really isn't an off the board option. By that I mean that just about anyone ranked from 15-55 could be on the table, depending on the team.
What is going off the board at 22-24? There are so many good options at that point, Were Chytil, Miller and Lundkvist so bad as ‘off-the board’ picks?
Exactly if guys like Jarvis/Mysak are gone then why not. 2 picks 20ish-50ish would be a little better than just one at 22/23. Preferably tho would like to stay close to the end of the first round/very early 2nd for one of the picks.Something to keep in mind is that this might be a draft where there really isn't an off the board option. By that I mean that just about anyone ranked from 15-55 could be on the table, depending on the team.
how are they going to safely do the combine?
I definitely don't know that. Just saying they may reach for a more physical forward who could be had in the 2nd round. I wouldn't be shocked.How do you know they don’t like Mysak or Gunler?
Exactly if guys like Jarvis/Mysak are gone then why not. 2 picks 20ish-50ish would be a little better than just one at 22/23. Preferably tho would like to stay close to the end of the first round/very early 2nd for one of the picks.
You might see localized/regional testing centers.
I don't recall ever thinking that Miller and Lundkvist were off the board. Is that really a thing on here?
![]()
Reading is for losers.
![]()
Reading is for losers.
The only one that may qualify is Chytil, since I think he was an early 2nd in most rankings. And frankly, since Lafreniere is as guaranteed and safe a pick as you can get, the Rangers last history is to go more for boom potential, so I’m not seeing them passing up the likes of Gunler or Mysak if they’re on the board. Still hoping for Perreault, as I’m really getting intrigued by his boom potential.
Lol I thought the Round Robin WAS the reseeding. What was the f***ing point of the RR then?That bracket isn't right either! They're reseeding this year. East is most likely going to be Philly/NYI and Tampa/Boston.
Exactly if guys like Jarvis/Mysak are gone then why not. 2 picks 20ish-50ish would be a little better than just one at 22/23. Preferably tho would like to stay close to the end of the first round/very early 2nd for one of the picks.
Thats fine. Just looking for a trading partner to grab a 2nd like ottawa did with us. Maybe a little better since this is regarded as a "better" draftchytil looks pretty good for an off the board late 1st. skjei, miller, and kreider were good picks in the late teens early 20s too.
Did you watch the one the Rangers just played?this avs coyotes series is one of the most lopsided series i can remember watching.
Gunler, IMO, has the highest boom potential.
Lafreniere and Gunler, if they both panned out, could be even better than Anaheim's first round in 2003.