As I scan newspapers across North America this morning, I am surprised how many are saying the one team they don’t want to run up against in the playoffs is the Rangers
As I scan newspapers across North America this morning, I am surprised how many are saying the one team they don’t want to run up against in the playoffs is the Rangers
A stud goalie and a young dynamic team.As I scan newspapers across North America this morning, I am surprised how many are saying the one team they don’t want to run up against in the playoffs is the Rangers
A stud goalie and a young dynamic team.
We are dangerous. Even more so when teams may take some time to get 'back to normal'.
What exactly does it entail that Carolina "voted to not play us"?
Contingent on the Leafs hopefully getting bounced early on preferably against the Jackets.If anything, I think we're worse off than if the playoffs/play-ins had started right after the last games of the regular season. The Rangers had a huge amount of momentum, and i'd not be surprised if that's all gone. On the bright side pick-wise, at least one of the Rangers or Canes is guaranteed out after the play-ins, so that pick shouldn't suffer too much
What exactly does it entail that Carolina "voted to not play us"?
What exactly does it entail that Carolina "voted to not play us"?
It's just BS. They voted "no" when asked about the play off format. The reason could very well be concerns over their players. But hey, let's spin it in a way that it sounds like they are afraid of the Rangers who lack depth in literally every department.
We have goalie depth, Bub.
Yep, sounds about as self-important as Rangers fans usually are.It's just BS. They voted "no" when asked about the play off format. The reason could very well be concerns over their players. But hey, let's spin it in a way that it sounds like they are afraid of the Rangers who lack depth in literally every department.
How I've heard Carolina parsed their 'no' vote was that they thought they'd done enough to earn their way in. The other team to vote no was Tampa who thought it penalized the higher seeded teams. Carolina does have a legit argument here but we do as well. It's very arguable that the Rangers who had been playing pretty well would have passed enough teams (some of whom were struggling) to claim the last playoff spot. Could it also be that Carolina's record against us the last several years has been atrocious? Yeah that could be a part of it too but I don't think you're going to find anyone in the Carolina organization who is going to admit to that. There are several ways that if the NHL was going to do this they could have. They could have just gone with the 8 teams in each conference with the best winning %. For me I'd rather the Rangers in the playoffs but if they had decided to do the 16 teams then I could accept us as a lottery team too even if we didn't have much of a shot at going higher than 13. Part of this is that they're trying to please as many teams as possible and in doing so the NHL has obviously displeased both Tampa and Carolina. Sucks for them but basically it sucked for the Rangers and Toronto when the salary cap was pushed through and both strikes. Rangers and Toronto franchises pretty much lost there though it helped get the Rangers house in order in the long run.
Playing with house money. Literally nothing to lose.As I scan newspapers across North America this morning, I am surprised how many are saying the one team they don’t want to run up against in the playoffs is the Rangers
Given that we're all dying for some hockey, and we own Carolina, the chances of us getting swept are 100%.
We're playing a team that beat the Capitals, swept the Islanders. The only players on this team who have played post-season hockey in the last 3 years are Panarin, Trouba, McKegg and Haley. We always hear how play off hockey is different. I think it's more likely that we get swept, than the other way around.
Not to mention that, at least on paper, their roster is better than last year’s.
They’ve added Trochek, Vatanen... and yeah, Skjei. I think they’ll likely be without Pesce though.
Aho, TT, Slavin, Necas all a year older. The Rangers are a talented team but our bottom 6 is AHL-caliber and we have 2 pylons on the left side of our defense
What's funny is that, in general, the ones who bring up our regular season record against the Hurricanes are the same who bring up the "Play offs are different" excuse every other debate.
Nah dude. Players grip their sticks tighter, goalies drink a lot of "clutch" juice during pre-game, and every other guy eats a hearty meal of "wants it more" before getting to the arena.Playoff hockey is the same as regular season hockey except for the media who like to make meaningless narratives out of every little story.