- Dec 20, 2018
- 22,971
- 51,715
Bring him home, the missing piece.
He’s in NY for thr following reasons
1- momey
2- off ice personal reasons
3- hockey
Of course he’s happy to stay there he’s getting the bulk of what he cares about no matter how good or bad the team around him is
I think he likes what NYC offers him off the ice as well.It's just money
And what’s a problem? He is number one goalie of the league. And he is banking on it. There were plenty of players who wanted to play for rangers no matter what. It turned out not so great for them. Rangers wanted him more than he wanted to play for them. Rangers need him more than he needs in rangers. So everybody are happy.It's just money
Seems to me like Pandora's box is fully open with regards to diving.
Part of the game now.
however you want to slice it there is still a massive advantage in regards to cap and taxes. i don't think it means one guy chooses a place over another but in a hard cap it makes a differencethis stuff is hard. It’s basically misinformation.
It’s accurate in that it’s just claiming to apply tax rates to contact values, but it’s not factoring in how signing bonuses are taxed, how away games are taxed, and any structures the athlete has set up on their end.
So, its not something anyone should use to seriously compare contracts.
But, people see the numbers and take it seriously. That’s where the misinformation comes in.
I think it actually makes some sense that the penalties are normally linked.well the problem is the refs never call it as a stand alone penalty. 99% of the time both guys go for some really stupid reason.
Prove it. Name five examples. Nobody wanted to go to Florida when the team sucked and had terrible ownership. This stupid talking point fundamentally misunderstands that tax issues aren't as cut and dry as the special interests on both sides of the border want it to be.however you want to slice it there is still a massive advantage in regards to cap and taxes.
if you read a little bit more you can see i clearly said i dont think it means one player chooses one place over another. you would never be able to prove it eitherProve it. Name five examples. Nobody wanted to go to Florida when the team sucked and had terrible ownership. This stupid talking point fundamentally misunderstands that tax issues aren't as cut and dry as the special interests on both sides of the border want it to be.
Except he could have gone to FA and started a bidding war or at least picked a different locale for the same money.It's just money
Sure, but they also want to get paid and have a life away from the rink and enjoy their surroundings and do whatever else it is with their lives. How they prioritize those issues varies. I'm skeptical anyone plays for the Rangers to win. They haven't won since 1994 and way too many guys on that team have off ice priorities that push winning far down on the list.At the end of the day, players want to win. Full stop.
Ok - sure. Why not?however you want to slice it there is still a massive advantage in regards to cap and taxes. i don't think it means one guy chooses a place over another but in a hard cap it makes a difference
As Devils fans, we'd like to think that the Rangers aren't a winning org.Sure, but they also want to get paid and have a life away from the rink and enjoy their surroundings and do whatever else it is with their lives. How they prioritize those issues varies. I'm skeptical anyone plays for the Rangers to win. They haven't won since 1994 and way too many guys on that team have off ice priorities that push winning far down on the list.
You're giving Brooksie too much credit. That article was just him trying to manifest a player he wants, to the team he likes. He's a stupid man and should be dismissed as such.Of course that is what that story was. This is what the Rangers and Leafs do.
I’m not giving Brooksie any credit. And I’m not saying what he wrote was false. I’m saying the Rangers front office intentionally leaked it to Brooks that the are interested in Brady Tkachuk in order to stir shit up in Ottawa in the hopes that Brady shakes loose down the line without directly tampering with the player. The intent from Brooks’s sources for the story was nakedly obvious.You're giving Brooksie too much credit. That article was just him trying to manifest a player he wants, to the team he likes. He's a stupid man and should be dismissed as such.
That would track... carry on.I’m not giving Brooksie any credit. And I’m not saying what he wrote was false. I’m the Rangers front office intentionally leaked it to Brooks that the are interested in Brady Tkachuk in order to stir shit up in Ottawa in the hopes that Brady shakes loose down the line without directly tampering with the player. The intent from Brooks’s sources for the story was nakedly obvious.