Around the NHL 2024-25 regular season

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,663
23,246
St Petersburg
It's just money
And what’s a problem? He is number one goalie of the league. And he is banking on it. There were plenty of players who wanted to play for rangers no matter what. It turned out not so great for them. Rangers wanted him more than he wanted to play for them. Rangers need him more than he needs in rangers. So everybody are happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: forceten

JrFischer54

Registered User
Apr 4, 2017
10,976
4,579
Seems to me like Pandora's box is fully open with regards to diving.

Part of the game now.

well the problem is the refs never call it as a stand alone penalty. 99% of the time both guys go for some really stupid reason.

this stuff is hard. It’s basically misinformation.

It’s accurate in that it’s just claiming to apply tax rates to contact values, but it’s not factoring in how signing bonuses are taxed, how away games are taxed, and any structures the athlete has set up on their end.

So, its not something anyone should use to seriously compare contracts.

But, people see the numbers and take it seriously. That’s where the misinformation comes in.
however you want to slice it there is still a massive advantage in regards to cap and taxes. i don't think it means one guy chooses a place over another but in a hard cap it makes a difference
 

Devils731

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
13,190
19,121
well the problem is the refs never call it as a stand alone penalty. 99% of the time both guys go for some really stupid reason.
I think it actually makes some sense that the penalties are normally linked.

Most NHL guys aren’t diving when they aren’t being fouled. They’re being fouled constantly from a varying degree of lightly to severely.

They’re diving to try and make the ref think the opposing players foul is severe rather than light or medium. So there is a foul on the play where the dive is happening, which ends up getting called.

——————

You could make diving a double minor to emphasize the need to remove it from the game, so that there is an actual penalty, but you’d probably just end up getting refs to stop calling it.

Or you could make diving subject to a 10 minute misconduct as well as the minor. Or you could suspend the player for the next game while keeping it a minor.

Either way, dives aren’t called consistently enough nor is the punishment severe enough so there isn’t a “good” solution. Harsher penalties will stop some diving but it will also make it less fair when the refs randomly decide to call a dive since there is constant diving and it’s rarely called.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

TheBeerNerd

Registered User
Nov 13, 2024
359
689
NY side of the Hudson River
however you want to slice it there is still a massive advantage in regards to cap and taxes.
Prove it. Name five examples. Nobody wanted to go to Florida when the team sucked and had terrible ownership. This stupid talking point fundamentally misunderstands that tax issues aren't as cut and dry as the special interests on both sides of the border want it to be.
 

JrFischer54

Registered User
Apr 4, 2017
10,976
4,579
Prove it. Name five examples. Nobody wanted to go to Florida when the team sucked and had terrible ownership. This stupid talking point fundamentally misunderstands that tax issues aren't as cut and dry as the special interests on both sides of the border want it to be.
if you read a little bit more you can see i clearly said i dont think it means one player chooses one place over another. you would never be able to prove it either
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
At the end of the day, players want to win. Full stop.
Sure, but they also want to get paid and have a life away from the rink and enjoy their surroundings and do whatever else it is with their lives. How they prioritize those issues varies. I'm skeptical anyone plays for the Rangers to win. They haven't won since 1994 and way too many guys on that team have off ice priorities that push winning far down on the list.
 

tailfins

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 20, 2005
2,817
1,833
however you want to slice it there is still a massive advantage in regards to cap and taxes. i don't think it means one guy chooses a place over another but in a hard cap it makes a difference
Ok - sure. Why not?

But, then so are:
- Location / weather
- Off-ice earning potential / market size
- History / O6 / "hockey market"
- Language

Smart teams will find ways to press their advantages.
 
Last edited:

tailfins

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 20, 2005
2,817
1,833
Sure, but they also want to get paid and have a life away from the rink and enjoy their surroundings and do whatever else it is with their lives. How they prioritize those issues varies. I'm skeptical anyone plays for the Rangers to win. They haven't won since 1994 and way too many guys on that team have off ice priorities that push winning far down on the list.
As Devils fans, we'd like to think that the Rangers aren't a winning org.

But, two ECFs in the past three years and having the top goalie in the league puts an organization pretty high up on the "winning" spectrum.

It's true that with the Rangers you get winning plus NYC. It's not Edmonton where you're 100% hockey. But, it's not like you have to give up on winning to play in NY.
 

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
43,519
13,853
Miami
You're giving Brooksie too much credit. That article was just him trying to manifest a player he wants, to the team he likes. He's a stupid man and should be dismissed as such.
I’m not giving Brooksie any credit. And I’m not saying what he wrote was false. I’m saying the Rangers front office intentionally leaked it to Brooks that the are interested in Brady Tkachuk in order to stir shit up in Ottawa in the hopes that Brady shakes loose down the line without directly tampering with the player. The intent from Brooks’s sources for the story was nakedly obvious.
 
Last edited:

TheBeerNerd

Registered User
Nov 13, 2024
359
689
NY side of the Hudson River
I’m not giving Brooksie any credit. And I’m not saying what he wrote was false. I’m the Rangers front office intentionally leaked it to Brooks that the are interested in Brady Tkachuk in order to stir shit up in Ottawa in the hopes that Brady shakes loose down the line without directly tampering with the player. The intent from Brooks’s sources for the story was nakedly obvious.
That would track... carry on.
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Sponsor
Jun 17, 2009
105,981
14,518
Connecticut
Some of these goalie moves are baffling. Same substandard goalies keep getting moved around ad infinitum.

It's like you have several pieces of rotten fruit floating in a punch bowl, and instead of fishing them out, you simply give the ladle a swirl so the they float to a different part of the bowl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons and Oneiro

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad