MartyOwns
thank you shero
- Apr 1, 2007
- 24,579
- 19,087
that looks like the decrepit set of that 90's flinstones abortion
that looks like the decrepit set of that 90's flinstones abortion
agreed zero chance they will pass up on all the extra money they would get from a new name on jersey and logo on other merch. they def wont be HC after this seasoni can't see them going with HC after the inaugural season
In 2024 the contract that Bobby Holik signed with the Rangers (5x9m) more than twenty years ago would still be seen as asinine. That blows my mind.
firing the coach in mid-June....poverty org
firing the coach in mid-June....poverty org
Was thinking the timing was odd...but they also just got a new GM, so it kinda makes sense.
In 2024 the contract that Bobby Holik signed with the Rangers (5x9m) more than twenty years ago would still be seen as asinine. That blows my mind.
Uh oh, the Ducks are angry now.
I'm guessing it's some kind of riff on the logo from their 30th anniversary jersey.
firing the coach in mid-June....poverty org
I’m waiting to see when they trade him to Philly. Where he really always wanted to be.
i always found it funny that every year, the rangers would buy the best available players only to flame out and go nowhere. then comes the salary cap, and they're perennial contenders. it's like the rangers were too stupid to figure out you can't build an all-star team and expect success, so the league stepped in.Because I’m pedantic and fascinated by pre-cap spending, I always like to jump in here and point out that top stars’ took up a ridiculous part of teams’ payrolls before the salary cap.
TOP 2002-03 NHL SALARIES
View attachment 883692View attachment 883693
An extreme example is
Kariya 10m is ~26% of Anaheim’s 38m
View attachment 883695
But yes, Holik’s, uh, generous salary still stands out on that list, but that’s the magic of unlimited cable money.
The Rangers were at 69.2m in 2002-03. (They had #4 Bure, #7 Leech and #8 Holik on this list.)
The Salary Cap started at 39m in 2005-06 and didn’t get to 69m until 2014-15.
https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/new-y...rangers-actually-move-on-from-barclay-goodrowgoodrow lol
Let’s check in on Alex Meruelo’s continuing efforts to get that arena in Arizona.
Well oiled machine.
Good luck with that.
For like a million? Sure. Whatever.We should sign him if they buy him out. Guy is a real winner.
He's exactly what this team needs.
My post was basically a mockery at someone (who appears to change names all the time) who said a couple of years ago that he was who we needed. And cited things like grit and toughness, winning, etc.For like a million? Sure. Whatever.
But signing those kinds of guys at massively inflated deals because he "knows how to win" and is a "playoff performer" are where big mistakes are made.
It's nice that you are only worried about his salary if you were going to fight him.I would 100% take on Goodrow if we could pay him league min