AzNightmare
Unregistered User
- May 11, 2011
- 1,724
- 1,415
Least the Leafs made one smart decision and canned Keefe.
Berube up next?
He also ground and pound the ice with a few shots. LolTkachuk falcon punched Pastrnak right in the face.
This series is getting nasty.
GM gets him Reaves and Klingburg, Keefe gets fired.
Yeah, that makes sense . . .
GM gets him Reaves and Klingburg, Keefe gets fired.
Yeah, that makes sense . . .
Yeah, it would be weird if they fired trevlingi agree with you it is weird they would finally make a good move.
The Klingberg signing wasnt good..However, I can see the reasoning why Treliving went out and acquired Reaves,Domi and Bertuzzi..Under Dubas, the Leafs were a talented, soft team that had zero heart, grit, or toughness.That Leafs last off season wanted to be a tough, gritty, scratch the hairs off our chest kind of good old Canadian team you can be proud of.
So they get a lazy floater who doesn't do shit while fighting scrubs to 'inspire' the team. Also, get a horrible defensemen who was ass beyond recognition.
Treiveling brought that Calgary stank to Toronto with bad intensions.
the question is whether the leafs braintrust has realized yet that going into another season with the same core is diminishing returns. i suspect that treliving is gunshy to make a star player swap after huberdeau, so that means he either blinks and extends or he has to try and get a three for one.
i predict a team like the kraken or utah gets marner and the leafs get a package of competent middle six players and prospects.
The Klingberg signing wasnt good..However, I can see the reasoning why Treliving went out and acquired Reaves,Domi and Bertuzzi..
The Klingberg signing wasnt good..However, I can see the reasoning why Treliving went out and acquired Reaves,Domi and Bertuzzi..Under Dubas, the Leafs were a talented, soft team that had zero heart, grit, or toughness.
They were one goal away from advancing (without having Matthews/Nylander simultaneously healthy)...At least they showed resilience this post season.
reaves, domi and bertuzzi have in common that all three are much bigger names than players. hard not to conclude they were stunt signings designed to engage the toronto market and i doubt treliving picked them and certainly not for on ice potential. they wreak of ownership to me.
He will go pro.
One final thing with the draft lottery, the percentages for the bottom 3 teams to win it out right seems to have remained the same 18.5, 13.5, 11.5% since 2016. That's 43.5% outright, with an extra 7% for the worst team if #12 to 16 OA win it, which has yet to happen these past 4 lotteries.
Just a quirk with the small sample size, but 7/8 draws have been won by the bottom 3 teams in the past 4 lotteries, whereas it was 3/10 for the bottom 3 the prior 5 lotteries when only looking at the top 2 picks.
Should even out to the % over time.
For sure they have goaltending and defensive depth issues, but that is tied in part to paying $40M for four forwards. That goes up to $46M next season. And one of those four is declining due to age, while another is a soft perimeter player.Everyone focuses on the 'core 4' but the central problem with that team over the past couple years is that the D/G is bottom-10 in the NHL.
What was funny (in a sad way) is that per the video the NHL released, SJ had one of their numbers come up for 3 straight draws. A 1/5 chance that one of their numbers come up yet they win 1st OA and their numbers come up twice for pick 2 in which they have to redraw it before Chicago's number is drawn.Yet we managed to fall to 5th despite having the 3rd best odds in 2016. Although in hindsight it probably wouldn't matter. We probably would have drafted Puljujarvi or traded the pick for Subban.