Proposal: Arizona Edmonton trade

lauder73

Registered User
May 9, 2011
130
1
How would both teams feel about a trade like. Who adds? What is added?

Michael Stone
Henrik Samuelsson

For

Benoit Pouliot
Brandon Davidson
2018 2nd round pick( can become 1st is Stone resigns with Oilers)
 

Jet Walters

Registered User
May 15, 2013
7,438
3,181
I think the Oilers would make that deal without the condition of the 2nd changing to a 1st.

What would a Hanzal/Stone package cost? Oilers 1st would be on the table in that case, along with Pouliot, a good young defenseman like Davidson or Reinhart, and some other young pieces with upside like Slepyshev/Khaira.
 

BlazingBlueAnt

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
4,371
1,278
I doubt we move Stone inside the division for that kind of package.

Also, are you sure you want another poor skating Oil King captain? :P
 

lauder73

Registered User
May 9, 2011
130
1
I doubt we move Stone inside the division for that kind of package.

Also, are you sure you want another poor skating Oil King captain? :P
Henrik was more of a throw in to even up contracts. Have to admit I really liked him when he played for the Oil Kings, foot speed did seem like an issue even back then though
 

ck26

Alcoholab User
Jan 31, 2007
12,296
3,117
Sun Belt
Pouliot is overpaid and the Coyotes already have a #67 on the roster. Stone is better than Davidson.

Easy pass for ARZ, we might be able to rent out Stone for a late 1st, why would we accept Pouliot's salary and a 2nd?
 

XX

Waiting for Ishbia
Dec 10, 2002
54,965
14,757
PHX
What would a Hanzal/Stone package cost? Oilers 1st would be on the table in that case, along with Pouliot, a good young defenseman like Davidson or Reinhart, and some other young pieces with upside like Slepyshev/Khaira.

AZ would be looking at RNH as part of a deal if Hanzal is involved.
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
17,153
6,914
Halifax
AZ would be looking at RNH as part of a deal if Hanzal is involved.

And you would be adding lots . Hanzel resigned under 5 per year and Stone signed to a good contract extension . Add Fayne in from our side for cap reason and contract .
 
Last edited:

ck26

Alcoholab User
Jan 31, 2007
12,296
3,117
Sun Belt
Davidson should have higher value than people on HF realize. He is really good. I wouldn't add a 1st in any deal with Davidson for Stone.
Why would ARZ want Davidson as a return for Stone?

Oliver Ekman-Larsson
Alex Goligoski
Jakob Chychrun

In the two years until Davidson hits UFA, which of these Coyotes LHD is he going to overtake?
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,553
14,054
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
Why would ARZ want Davidson as a return for Stone?

Oliver Ekman-Larsson
Alex Goligoski
Jakob Chychrun

In the two years until Davidson hits UFA, which of these Coyotes LHD is he going to overtake?

You're asking the wrong guy, I never said they would. Just that HF doesn't realize how good Davidson is. If you have an issue with him being a centrepiece in the deal, then take that up with the guy who suggested it. All I am saying is that like many defensemen without amazing offensive stats, Davidson gets undervalued around here.
 

zar

Bleed Blue
Oct 9, 2010
7,529
7,594
Edmonton AB
Why would ARZ want Davidson as a return for Stone?

Oliver Ekman-Larsson
Alex Goligoski
Jakob Chychrun

In the two years until Davidson hits UFA, which of these Coyotes LHD is he going to overtake?

RFA (big difference for determining value)

... but I do understand the premise of your post. LHD is not a need for the Coyotes.
 

cobra427

Registered User
May 6, 2012
9,383
3,421
And you would be adding lots . Hanzel resigned under 5 per ear and Stone signed to a good contract extension . Add Fayne in from our side for cap reason and contract .

RNh is an over paid 2C/3C. He is really worth 4 mill per year. He has 4 years left at 6 mill. If a team trades for him, they would be taking on an extra 8 mill in salary over 4 years. That salary reduces RNH's value by a lot. The Oilers already have a 1C/2C so they might want to unload his salary. Hanzal is the better player but is injured a lot. Hanzal could help the Oilers playoff run. I can see a Hanzal for RNH plus small parts to even it out.
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
17,153
6,914
Halifax
RNh is an over paid 2C/3C. He is really worth 4 mill per year. He has 4 years left at 6 mill. If a team trades for him, they would be taking on an extra 8 mill in salary over 4 years. That salary reduces RNH's value by a lot. The Oilers already have a 1C/2C so they might want to unload his salary. Hanzal is the better player but is injured a lot. Hanzal could help the Oilers playoff run. I can see a Hanzal for RNH plus small parts to even it out.

Except RNH is way better then Draisaitl so I am not sure how you can call RNH a 2 or 3 while calling Draisaitl a 2 or 3 . RNH is a low end 1 C or a high end 2 . People/fans bash Oilers fans for many years when point production was mention in threads for Oilers players . The responds were always the same there more to playing hockey then points . Now we got a good 2 way player and people want to judge his value base on points produced alone and not his defensive side of the game . We are happy with RNH if you want him a great 3 C has to come back plus something that we need . Hanzel is out of the lineup more then he in it and a UFA , Stone is a UFA those pieces don't get you RNH unless they are locked p at a Larsson type of contract
 

Matthews316

Registered User
Nov 21, 2016
12
0
Toronto
Except RNH is way better then Draisaitl so I am not sure how you can call RNH a 2 or 3 while calling Draisaitl a 2 or 3 . RNH is a low end 1 C or a high end 2 . People/fans bash Oilers fans for many years when point production was mention in threads for Oilers players . The responds were always the same there more to playing hockey then points . Now we got a good 2 way player and people want to judge his value base on points produced alone and not his defensive side of the game . We are happy with RNH if you want him a great 3 C has to come back plus something that we need . Hanzel is out of the lineup more then he in it and a UFA , Stone is a UFA those pieces don't get you RNH unless they are locked p at a Larsson type of contract

RNH isn't way better, he may be a tad better than Draisaitl now but Draisaitl has more upside long term.
 

cobra427

Registered User
May 6, 2012
9,383
3,421
Except RNH is way better then Draisaitl so I am not sure how you can call RNH a 2 or 3 while calling Draisaitl a 2 or 3 . RNH is a low end 1 C or a high end 2 . People/fans bash Oilers fans for many years when point production was mention in threads for Oilers players . The responds were always the same there more to playing hockey then points . Now we got a good 2 way player and people want to judge his value base on points produced alone and not his defensive side of the game . We are happy with RNH if you want him a great 3 C has to come back plus something that we need . Hanzel is out of the lineup more then he in it and a UFA , Stone is a UFA those pieces don't get you RNH unless they are locked p at a Larsson type of contract

If RNH were a low end 1C or a high end 2C there would be a line at the door if he were available. Yes, at the moment, he is better than Drai but at 6 mill, he is way over paid. You won't get equal value unless it is a trade for another over paid player byt 2 mill a year for 4 years. If Hanzal or Stone was locked up with a Larson type contract, they would never be traded for RNH.
 

Seachd

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
25,249
9,881
RNh is an over paid 2C/3C. He is really worth 4 mill per year. He has 4 years left at 6 mill. If a team trades for him, they would be taking on an extra 8 mill in salary over 4 years. That salary reduces RNH's value by a lot. The Oilers already have a 1C/2C so they might want to unload his salary. Hanzal is the better player but is injured a lot. Hanzal could help the Oilers playoff run. I can see a Hanzal for RNH plus small parts to even it out.

This is way out there. Teams trading for Nugent-Hopkins would not be taking on "an extra $8 million" just because you think he's overpaid.

And overpaid or underpaid, there's no way he's getting traded for someone without a contract, obviously.
 

cobra427

Registered User
May 6, 2012
9,383
3,421
This is way out there. Teams trading for Nugent-Hopkins would not be taking on "an extra $8 million" just because you think he's overpaid.

And overpaid or underpaid, there's no way he's getting traded for someone without a contract, obviously.

I'm not alone in thinking he is over paid. He might get traded for somebody on a shorter contract or for a UFA if the Oilers want to unload his salary.
 

Snarky Coyote

Registered User
Sponsor
May 3, 2009
739
284
Now with more snark
I wish both Toronto and Edmonton fans would realize trades are not normally done in a vacuum. Your good parts may not be a good fit for another team, or the cap hits change the value. Hanzal is probably going to get a late 1st raffled off to a team that thinks they are a player away from contending for the cup. Not a good idea for the Oilers unless they think this is the year. (and its probably not, they are going to be crazy good in 2 years but not time to sell off key parts for UFA's). In addition to value, the expansion draft is a huge factor on whether a team is able to keep a player that they are trading the farm for. Stone is worth less, but he is still a decent 2nd pairing/ high 3rd pairing D that we don't have room for. If Edmonton can resign him at a reasonable price who gets exposed? That's probably not someone Arizona needs unless its a 2c or 3c with less than 3 years left on a contract. Kiddos will be coming up soonish. If its a 2c I would expect we add a sweetener.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Except RNH is way better then Draisaitl so I am not sure how you can call RNH a 2 or 3 while calling Draisaitl a 2 or 3 . RNH is a low end 1 C or a high end 2 . People/fans bash Oilers fans for many years when point production was mention in threads for Oilers players . The responds were always the same there more to playing hockey then points . Now we got a good 2 way player and people want to judge his value base on points produced alone and not his defensive side of the game . We are happy with RNH if you want him a great 3 C has to come back plus something that we need . Hanzel is out of the lineup more then he in it and a UFA , Stone is a UFA those pieces don't get you RNH unless they are locked p at a Larsson type of contract

RNH isnt a #1C, even on the low end. He probably settles in as a 20-25g/50-60pt #2C. nothing wrong with that
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad