Are the Sabres better off without Skinner?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Are the Sabres better without Skinner?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 15 57.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 11 42.3%

  • Total voters
    26

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,787
18,755
Just curious what y’all think- I’m convinced it was simply a cost cutting move, and somehow a lot of Sabres fans have bought into the scapegoating of Skinner, but whatever- dude’s gone, replaced by Zucker. From what you’ve seen, is he really that bad defensively as to be of negative value? Sabres are 12 mil below the cap with all core pieces signed, so it’s tough to make the money argument- at worst the move coulda been made later, but again, I’m biased.

Tl;dr- are the Sabres better without Skinner?
 

sr edler

gold is not reality
Mar 20, 2010
12,070
6,539
Getting rid of empty calories players like Skinner and Savoie, when you're already loaded with other offensive prospects, seems like a very reasonable move, yes.

It's clear they've chosen a bit of a different approach this year building that 4th line with Malenstyn, Kubel and Lafferty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regal

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,147
142,179
Bojangles Parking Lot
Skinner’s an easy scapegoat for poorly constructed teams needing a reboot. It’s happened to him twice now.

The thing is, everyone has always known exactly what he is and he has delivered on exactly that. No he’s not bad enough defensively to make any real difference, certainly not any more than your typical one-way winger. It’s just an easy narrative to sell on a player who has virtually no defensive responsibility in the first place.

You want to know what went wrong in Carolina and then Buffalo, look at the core players who were supposed to be dominating the middle of the ice, your centers, your top pair D, your goalies. Out of 82 games, how many times did Skinner’s team have the advantage in those areas? The story of those positions gets swept under the rug to scapegoat a guy whose job was to score goals and did that effectively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolfpuck and PuckG

Faceboner

Registered User
Jan 6, 2022
1,978
1,398
Are the Sabres better without him? Yes, not because he was bad just that we are giving our younger guys more opportunity if we were lacking a top 6 winger we would br much worse off however a guy like zucker is a better 3rd line fit than skins. Next to drai or McD 35-40 goals and 70 points won't surprise.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
33,760
33,517
NJ
Skinner is a good player but his contract was too much

His buyout is 1.4 then 4.4, 6.4, and 3 years of 2.4. Skinner had 3 years left at 9 mil. They replaced him this year with Zucker and he’s making 5 mil. So that’s essentially 7.4 this year for Zucker as Skinner’s replacement. Only 1.6 mil in savings and it’s not like they’re hurting for cap space. They still have 8 mil left. Skinner’s contract might not have been ideal but it was certainly better than buying it out this summer.
 

Uncle Scrooge

Hockey Bettor
Nov 14, 2011
13,690
8,376
Helsinki
I voted yes, but it's not a simple answer.

Yes because they want to have a certain identity - and Skinner doesn't fit into that. And it's an uncomfortable situation for everyone to have a 9M dollar player sitting in the press box.

But at the same time, if some wingers go down with injuries you wish you still had him.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
33,760
33,517
NJ
I voted yes, but it's not a simple answer.

Yes because they want to have a certain identity - and Skinner doesn't fit into that. And it's an uncomfortable situation for everyone to have a 9M dollar player sitting in the press box.

But at the same time, if some wingers go down with injuries you wish you still had him.

If Lindy is going to be coaching anything like he did in NJ then Skinner fits the actual identity of the team to a tee.
 

Uncle Scrooge

Hockey Bettor
Nov 14, 2011
13,690
8,376
Helsinki
If Lindy is going to be coaching anything like he did in NJ then Skinner fits the actual identity of the team to a tee.
Well if you look at how the team is built and how they played down the stretch, they want to be hard to play against with a physical edge and on strong on battles, mixed with skill but also comfortable in lower scoring games. A playoff type team.

I don't know what exactly with Lindy you're referring to, but for me Jeff doesn't feel like a great fit, especially when they already have Quinn and Benson who want those minutes.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad