NotAVacuumSalesman
Positive Mistake Culture™
- Jun 19, 2017
- 4,051
- 8,360
If you go back and watch those games, it was certainly street rules. Crazy some of the things that went on. As a kid I loved it. But my tune changed a decade ago when I met an ex player who only played 10 games in the NHL. Pretty much a career AHL tough guy who fought in the era of Rob Ray etc.Someone show this kid some footage from the 80s, thanks.
I guess you are still a teenager. The game is way less violent than 20 years ago let alone in the 70s and 80s.There have been dirty plays nearly every night in the playoffs. Lack of respect for opponents is astonishing and teams are trying to take out each other’s biggest stars. This is because the punishments for attempts to injure are either far too lenient or not given at all.
This issue could easily be addressed, but Bettman and Parros do nothing about it. That’s because they think violence could draw in new viewers, who now eagerly wait to see who will retaliate and how.
Apparently, the NHL wants to see star players taken out night after night. Hockey is a physical and tough sport, but there’s nothing tough about blindsiding or hitting a defenseless player from behind.
Right now we are not far from career ending injury any given night.
Not sure about the NHL, but in my experience Beer League tends to get more agro during the NHL Playoffs.
Geez, might as well search photos of dinosaursSomeone show this kid some footage from the 80s, thanks.
What kind of question is that? I do remember both. Savard was briefly top10 player in the league.Check out the early 2010s Bruins. How many people really remember Marc Savard or Nathan Horton?
Lack of enforcers will do thatThere have been dirty plays nearly every night in the playoffs. Lack of respect for opponents is astonishing and teams are trying to take out each other’s biggest stars. This is because the punishments for attempts to injure are either far too lenient or not given at all.
This issue could easily be addressed, but Bettman and Parros do nothing about it. That’s because they think violence could draw in new viewers, who now eagerly wait to see who will retaliate and how.
Apparently, the NHL wants to see star players taken out night after night. Hockey is a physical and tough sport, but there’s nothing tough about blindsiding or hitting a defenseless player from behind.
Right now we are not far from career ending injury any given night.
LoL @ “any 70s Flyers game”....I think lots of people on this site were not alive during some of the Montreal/Quebec series' in the 1980s. Or any series between the Islanders and Rangers. Or any Flyers game in the 1970s.
Or go one step further and if a player incurs an unsportsmanlike penalty of any kind he AND the coach are suspended automatically for the next gameI don’t get why penalties don’t carry over to the next game. Suspension's do and they happen in the previous game. It just makes the end of the game a free for all if the other team knows there’s nothing to lose.
Just curious, when would it be violent enough?Not violent enough!
Just curious, when would it be violent enough?
90s violenceJust curious, when would it be violent enough?
Pfft90s violence