I like Jeannot on the Byfield line. He playsca more physical style of hockey that complements the line.I just wonder how Kaliyev would look on the Byfield-Foegle line right now (I have nothing against Jeannot, BTW).
We'll never know. It wasn't even worth trying apparently.
Personally, I don't like "one dimensional" sniper types (although IMO AK isn't as one dimensional as people think). I like guys you can put anywhere in the line up and can skate. That said, I still would've liked him to get an extended look in the role he was meant for before giving up on him.
Kings aren’t in the market for ‘trying’ anything right now. They are playing tremendous hockey and have done it all year without Kaliyev.I like Jeannot on the Byfield line. He playsca more physical style of hockey that complements the line.
Very much why I like Turcotte on the Kopitar line. He provides a good work rate along with his skillset.
If any line, I think Kaliyev would still go well with Danault.
I know that would leave Fiala out of the top 9. I just think it would have been worth trying if the Kings would have been willing to give him another opportunity.
Bro might just be ditsy. They did a New Year’s resolution interview for a teammate thing and Foegele’s was for Fiala to read more booksFiala looks confused most of the time.
I kind of feel bad for him because I think he's trying to play a team game, but he just can't figure it out.
Then I remember that he's a handsome 28 year old multimillionaire living in LA and don't feel sorry for him anymore.
haha. wouldve been appropos if the people in Fugging told them all to f*** off re. the name change. Should not have caved.
haha hell ya, I could see fraternities making that a pledge requirement...having lived in a town that had a big tourist season to the point you you couldnt drive anywhere certain hours, I totally get it.The reason why they changed the name was because they were overrun by 1 hour tourists who spent little or no money but caused harassments for the locals
Jeannot not being able to handle the puck so well looks like it forces Q to be more assertive. He also is good at opening ice up by making simple plays.I like Jeannot on the Byfield line. He playsca more physical style of hockey that complements the line.
Very much why I like Turcotte on the Kopitar line. He provides a good work rate along with his skillset.
If any line, I think Kaliyev would still go well with Danault.
I know that would leave Fiala out of the top 9. I just think it would have been worth trying if the Kings would have been willing to give him another opportunity.
They've iced Burroughs 20 times & you're going to tell me the King's can't ice players that might cost them in the standings? Burroughs has cost the King's points in the last two weeks in 5 minutes of ice time.Can’t risk losing games while developing players or we might not have the success we have had.
*Checks notes
Zero playoff series wins and a few lottery picks since 2014 doesn’t happen without some seriously hard decisions. I guess.
meanwhile, the Kings have collected 8 of 10 points in last two weeks. f***ing Burroughs...They've iced Burroughs 20 times & you're going to tell me the King's can't ice players that might cost them in the standings? Burroughs has cost the King's points in the last two weeks in 5 minutes of ice time.
They're on pace to lose to the Oilers in the first round again.Kings have to be the most slept on team at the moment. They’re without Doughty, a starting goaltender (despite Darcy’s best effort), and just a 9 goal Byfield, yet they refuse to die into a black hole. We’re all waiting for the other shoe to drop, right?
The argument that playing Kaliyev may cost the team would normally have some legitimacy. Not when Burroughs, who is a detriment to the team, has played 20 games so far.meanwhile, the Kings have collected 8 of 10 points in last two weeks. f***ing Burroughs...
This logic is kinda contradictory no?? Isn’t Kaliyev an example of someone who has surprisingly good production in his limited / early career sample, while often being misused, given rotating teammates etc etcThe love affair around here with prospects who have done very little with their NHL opportunities, is wild. The same people who write off players like Vilardi, Bustfield and Turcotte before they even step on the big league ice.
You all want to trade Fiala, but somehow Kaliyev is the 2nd coming of Christ….wild.
He sucked last year, no matter what role he was in -- but of course, the peanut gallery refuses to blame the player, it's always the org's fault. Plenty of other prospects have made their way despite having to play 'grinder' roles and limited playing time.This logic is kinda contradictory no?? Isn’t Kaliyev an example of someone who has surprisingly good production in his limited / early career sample, while often being misused, given rotating teammates etc etc
Again, normally this would be a good argument, but Kaliyev isn't the only player that has been mishandled by the King's.He sucked last year, no matter what role he was in -- but of course, the peanut gallery refuses to blame the player, it's always the org's fault. Plenty of other prospects have made their way despite having to play 'grinder' roles and limited playing time.
This logic is kinda contradictory no?? Isn’t Kaliyev an example of someone who has surprisingly good production in his limited / early career sample, while often being misused, given rotating teammates etc etc
This just flat out isn't true.He sucked last year, no matter what role he was in
Stranger things have happened, but you really think there is a team out there envisioning him in their top 6 but were refusing to make a trade? Weird...And he's done this while being WILDLY mis-used/mis-developed. Some team is going to claim him, throw him in their top 6, and laugh as they watch him turn into a 30 goal scorer.
There is an old adage for everything.Stranger things have happened, but you really think there is a team out there envisioning him in their top 6 but were refusing to make a trade? Weird...
a better example would be a baseball analogy.This logic is kinda contradictory no?? Isn’t Kaliyev an example of someone who has surprisingly good production in his limited / early career sample, while often being misused, given rotating teammates etc etc
Teams might not have been jumping at the chance to trade a pick for Kaliyev but when they see he's suddenly available for free on the waiver wire that changes things.Stranger things have happened, but you really think there is a team out there envisioning him in their top 6 but were refusing to make a trade? Weird...