KopitarGOAT420
Registered User
Yeah I imagine Danault could be another option but it seems a lot riskier to part ways with Danault IMO - in large part because he's a center as you mentioned.I agree I was just discussing it because of all the chatter on this board about trading him. Though if a team wanted him bad enough and made a good offer its not the worst idea in the world. I suppose Moore is a good candidate as they look about the same without him. Im surprised no one mentions Danault in this conversation really. Maybe because a center is harder to replace for the Kings right now.
Center depth and defensive structure are two huge strengths for the Kings right now. Danault helps a lot with that, even if he has struggled a bit at times this year. Having Kopitar, Byfield, and Danault down the middle (with Helenius playing some very respectable hockey on the 4th line too) is veryyyy advantageous for the Kings. Probably only makes sense to move Danault if you're somehow making an upgrade down the middle but that doesn't seem too realistic.
Seems a lot easier to move a winger like Moore for an upgraded scoring winger and keep things the same down the middle.