I can't help but be sad that a guy that we drafted, that played for us for almost 1000 games is gone, but it's the right thing for him and the team. I wish the best for him.
Well, still. This “ we waste a contract slot “ when in reality, Gibson is the only other player we need a slot for( sorry guys were not trading and retaining on killorn) has been overblown. Cam out of town for a 2nd( that I would bet anything verbeek uses in a trade to help the team at some point )with meaningless retention, kids get to play now. Great news.Not even close, Helleson was a second round pick that Avs fans considered a surefire NHL defender. Jeremie is a poor man's Noah Warren, unless his play has evolved by leaps and bounds in thr ECHL he's a contract slot and that's it.
2 different motivators, Rangers wanted to shed the whole deal, Ducks wanted to get the most value for Cam. Sure we could have taken a worse return for Cam with no retention but I don’t think anyone would be in favor of thatBetween NYR not retaining on Trouba and us retaining on Cam, I sure hope Verbeek tidies up that part of his negotiation strategy moving forward.
Not really. It tends to mean a lot to the players.
Well, still. This “ we waste a contract slot “ when in reality, Gibson is the only other player we need a slot for( sorry guys were not trading and retaining on killorn) has been overblown. Cam out of town for a 2nd( that I would bet anything verbeek uses in a trade to help the team at some point )with meaningless retention, kids get to play now. Great news.
Vatrano, Dumoulin, and Gibson could still be traded this year, and two of those three could actually bring a useful return with retention, while the other will get what Fowler got with retention. A 2nd in two years may have reduced return that’d be useful significantly sooner.Well, still. This “ we waste a contract slot “ when in reality, Gibson is the only other player we need a slot for( sorry guys were not trading and retaining on killorn) has been overblown. Cam out of town for a 2nd( that I would bet anything verbeek uses in a trade to help the team at some point )with meaningless retention, kids get to play now. Great news.
My feelings exactly. When he got selected to play for the US at the Olympics, that was a peak feeling too. Always liked the guy. Kind of a shame that injury really harmed his offensive tenaciousness but he was a good and long serving soldier for this team.We he dropped to us in his draft year in was ecstatic. Almost 1000 games later, one of the best picks in franchise history. He will be missed.
Also, f*** Shane doan.
They got positive value for a guy who was actively complicating things for the team and rapidly declining, the only way you can complain about this is if you were attached to the idea of Fowler or sentimental things like the 1K games mark.Talking about this, man. Give me a break with that shit.
Trouba coming in, verbeek somewhat hinting that he sees him here long term. Our trouble scoring and not being able to bring in vets that want to play here past being over paid. No shot now that vatrano doesn’t resign(especially since he’s been very vocal about wanting to be here , you neeed guys like that) unless we trade him in a deal for an immediate upgrade and younger playerVatrano, Dumoulin, and Gibson could still be traded this year, and two of those three could actually bring a useful return with retention, while the other will get what Fowler got with retention. A 2nd in two years may have reduced return that’d be useful significantly sooner.
Yes, and the return on Vatrano will be larger with retention. Same with Dumoulin. And Gibson can’t be traded without it. Vatrano won’t likely get much of a contract from us unless his scoring touch returns, and if he really wants to play here, can return after a few months elsewhere - nobody is giving him 8 years.Trouba coming in, verbeek somewhat hinting that he sees him here long term. Our trouble scoring and not being able to bring in vets that want to play here past being over paid. No shot now that vatrano doesn’t resign(especially since he’s been very vocal about wanting to be here , you neeed guys like that) unless we trade him in a deal for an immediate upgrade and younger player
IDK, maybe we can get PK Subban or Wayne Simmonds thereThat was my entire point. A late 2007 2nd is not exciting to me.
Well playedIDK, maybe we can get PK Subban or Wayne Simmonds there
i wanted to get that in before you fixed it lol
Idk about that.Listen, cam has been bad this year, really bad, BUT, the "Fowler sucks" brigade has been one of the most weirdly emotional, nonsensical (and loud) factions this board has ever seen. That finnish vatanen guy level weird.
Maybe chill on the "don't be emotional about cam leaving" bits, that's hysterically unself-aware.
I have no clue why anyone would expect to be “excited” by the return for FowlerYes, and the return on Vatrano will be larger with retention. Same with Dumoulin. And Gibson can’t be traded without it. Vatrano won’t likely get much of a contract from us unless his scoring touch returns, and if he really wants to play here, can return after a few months elsewhere - nobody is giving him 8 years.
I’m not remotely sold on Trouba being good enough to deserve a long contract, nor convinced that he will want to play here with our clueless coach.
That was my entire point. A late 2027 2nd is not exciting to me.
I’m not remotely sold on Trouba being good enough to deserve a long contract, nor convinced that he will want to play here with our clueless coach.
Honestly, it's probably addition by subtraction at this point.Idk how to feel about it. Obviously time to move on, but the pick is as meh as meh gets, and we retained a lot.
Considering the NTC it’s pretty good though.
There are going to be people who are sad about a guy who played 1000 games here leaving. Asking them to not feel that way is really odd.They got positive value for a guy who was actively complicating things for the team and rapidly declining, the only way you can complain about this is if you were attached to the idea of Fowler or sentimental things like the 1K games mark.
They’re welcome to, but it should be with the understanding that it’s not objectiveThere are going to be people who are sad about a guy who played 1000 games here leaving. Asking them to not feel that way is really odd.
Idk how to feel about it. Obviously time to move on, but the pick is as meh as meh gets, and we retained a lot.
Thank you for allowing this.They’re welcome to, but it should be with the understanding that it’s not objective