My Special Purpose
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2008
- 8,151
- 21,787
This is the part that I think has been lost:
1) Carolina uses cap space to acquire a 1st with Marleau.
2) The cap number is released, lower than expected.
3) Carolina dumps de Haan's contract for little return.
It does make sense that they see an opportunity to capitalize again on another team with cap trouble, but needed space to do so.
Of course, last year we all thought there was an opportunity to utilize the D depth to acquire a forward, especially after signing de Haan , and that didn't happen. So we will see if they can complete the process this off-season after they failed to last off-season.
Maybe that's the case. But I still think we did the Marleau trade because we knew we had a landing spot for one of our d-men. I think the order in which the trades were made makes it look like de Haan was a reaction to the cap being lower, but if they had happened in the reverse order, it would be clear that de Haan moving was what made it OK for us to take on Marleau and get the first-rounder out of Toronto.