DustyDangler
Registered User
- Dec 20, 2023
- 1,297
- 2,122
Race boasting sure is central to his identity.I was curious what XG was up to
Race boasting sure is central to his identity.I was curious what XG was up to
While I agree with what the mayor is saying, it's also a ridiculous statement considering they just recently helped the Suns with their renovations. Additionally, how many different companies will build office space, or headquarters in an area because they are receiving benefits from the city? Are those companies not able to absorb the costs themselves, as they are expecting an NHL owner to do so?
Nope.When they build the arena, will they get the Jets to relocate?
I think that Gallego's statement is more of a warning that the city is not just going to kowtow to Meruelo just because people are hungry to have a team back. And it's also an under-the-table notification that Gallego doesn't trust Meruelo any more than most of us do. He's making a lot of promises and statements that haven't paid off, and I think her statement's verbiage is intended to communicate an unstated message that until Meruelo puts his money where his mouth is, Phoenix is not going to just roll over and give him carte blanche.
While I agree with what the mayor is saying, it's also a ridiculous statement considering they just recently helped the Suns with their renovations. Additionally, how many different companies will build office space, or headquarters in an area because they are receiving benefits from the city? Are those companies not able to absorb the costs themselves, as they are expecting an NHL owner to do so?
Yes….. but a new arena downtown as Stanton wanted in 2016 probably would have faced a public vote.Except, Mayor Stanton would've been all for this
Forget 2016, if he was the standing Mayor of Phoenix he would've been in public support of the Meruelo need/want.Yes….. but a new arena downtown as Stanton wanted in 2016 probably would have faced a public vote.
From Morgan's post you were able to infer the Mayor was letting Meruelo know she doesn't trust him? That's amazing! There's not even a direct quote from the mayor.I think that Gallego's statement is more of a warning that the city is not just going to kowtow to Meruelo just because people are hungry to have a team back. And it's also an under-the-table notification that Gallego doesn't trust Meruelo any more than most of us do. He's making a lot of promises and statements that haven't paid off, and I think her statement's verbiage is intended to communicate an unstated message that until Meruelo puts his money where his mouth is, Phoenix is not going to just roll over and give him carte blanche.
From Morgan's post you were able to infer the Mayor was letting Meruelo know she doesn't trust him? That's amazing! There's not even a direct quote from the mayor.
If the City of Phoenix had insisted on making the Footprint renovations include an
NHL ice surface we wouldn't be having these discussions. My understanding is the city wanted
that as part of the deal, but folded to Sarver's demands in the end. I don't think it's Monday morning quarterbacking to say that Phoenix was 100% wrong in the end. It's common sense on so many levels.
At some point a hockey arena was going to be needed and if Meruelo or some other owner had succeeded (or does succeed going forward), the future arena would have surely drawn concerts and other events away from Footprint. Hurting Footprint's revenue stream. I'm certain if TED had been built, that area would have been more desirable then Footprint.
The guaranteed 40 dates for NHL hockey is another revenue stream.
Forget 2016, if he was the standing Mayor of Phoenix he would've been in public support of the Meruelo need/want.
But that's a fantasy reality. This is just par for the Course and if AM is actually surprised by this he will fail immensely, again.
If the City of Phoenix had insisted on making the Footprint renovations include an
NHL ice surface we wouldn't be having these discussions. My understanding is the city wanted
that as part of the deal, but folded to Sarver's demands in the end. I don't think it's Monday morning quarterbacking to say that Phoenix was 100% wrong in the end. It's common sense on so many levels.
It probably did not help AM's case to the mayor that just six weeks ago, his organization was making public statements that they were going to buy and build on the land with or without the theme park district. If I were the mayor, I'd support him building it without the theme park district, too.
To me, it's more than just precedent. It seems dumb, economically speaking. You have a bunch of land with no access/utilities that someone is going to bid on and develop with utility access that will make the other plots of land around there easier to develop and more attractive. All of this is to say, helping them with a tax district seems to provide more financial benefit to the city/state than not. I don't think I view the tax district as taxpayers paying for the arena which is why the verbiage used by Gallego makes me question, even with Craig's follow up post, what exactly she is saying she won't support.Which is all fine and great except it sets a bad precedence. Current businesses (like Mattel theme park) and future businesses will be affected. Its also something that looks like politics politicking. If the only tax payers that pay are the ones visiting the entertainment district or spending money in the theme park district, why is there that much care?
I see it as politicians saying they are "standing up to billionaires" for reelection clout without realizing or caring about the precedence they are setting.
I agree with that added point. There hasn't been any issues until its highlighted project with views. Same goes for the Scottsdale mayor, and the other politicians that have skin in this game making a stink about it.To me, it's more than just precedent. It seems dumb, economically speaking. You have a bunch of land with no access/utilities that someone is going to bid on and develop with utility access that will make the other plots of land around there easier to develop and more attractive. All of this is to say, helping them with a tax district seems to provide more financial benefit to the city/state than not. I don't think I view the tax district as taxpayers paying for the arena which is why the verbiage used by Gallego makes me question, even with Craig's follow up post, what exactly she is saying she won't support.
...the optics are not good.
No, according to Sen. Jake Hoffman, lawmakers are upset that only the city of Phoenix will benefit and not other developing areas.Boys, the problem is that Phoenix will not receive any taxes from the district whatsoever. No property tax, no sales tax, the only benefactor will be the Meruelo group. It's true that Am's efforts will bring additional development sooner, that will be taxed, but the optics are not good.
I'd bet $50 he didn't ever know this was in the worksHere's more info on the announcement.
Couldn't tell ya if this has any impact on Meruelo's plans or not.
Suns reveal name of G League team