There's only one thing in bothered by at this point. I've noticed a similar problem between Lafreniere and Kakko. It must be said that Kakko had *more* problems, and the analytics bear that out. Most of those have gotten better.
But aside from last night one thing persists: they're just sort of...bleh. That's not to say they're bad, it's just...I always have all these chicken legs in my freezer, right? Because they're quick and cheap. I rely on them a couple of nights a week and they come through. But I'm never as pumped about them as I am about taco night. You know what I mean?
Both players have been effective this year, but you never sense imminent danger. On the other hand, Panarin can't take a shift without doing something that rearranges the defense or gets the goalie to move.
Kakko was outstanding last night but Panarin was the real knife though the defense on both scoring plays he set up. Laf could have 4 or 5 goals with some more luck but other players have set him up.
They just haven't been grab-the-offense-by-the-balls dangerous players. Not yet. There's something to be said for guys who facilitate, granted. Like I said, Kakko was outstanding last night. I always said Kakko reminds me of Nash. Nash always felt a little bit vanilla for his talent level, but he had a great career being a complete player who made things happen and had a couple of years where he went off. If that's Kakko, sign me up.
Long-term, from Lafreniere, I want more spice. Kakko has said in Finnish interviews that Quinn preaches to the young players not to try to do too much. I certainly get that, but you can overdo that.
This is not meant to be a negative post. It's just a pattern I've observed and something we may need to work on.