I'll take issue with this. The economic structure of the time might have made it difficult to sign Kovalev to a deal competitive with the open market or a team with a massive payroll of the Rangers and necessitate a trade, but it did not force Craig Patrick to trade him for what he traded for.
Other teams were selling off talent and getting high picks and prospects, and what do we get for a winger who's last three seasons resulted in 90+ point scoring pace? A lousy Mikael Samuelsson and three career minor leaguers. You didn't need hindsight to see what a horrible trade it was, and I blame ownership just as much for signing off on it. I can't even believe the NHL approved such a heinously ******, lopsided deal.
It was the most annoying thing about Craig's attempt at a re-build. It was like he was always trying to pull off these acrobatic miracle trades turning retreads into superstars outsmarting himself in the process. San Jose got Brad Boyes and a 1st round pick for Owen Nolan mere weeks after we traded Kovalev, Washington got Brooks Laich, Tomas Fleischmann and a bunch of first round picks (including Mike Green) for Bondra, Lang and Gonchar. Chicago has Bryan Bickell today out of trading Alexei Zhamnov. What did we get? Rico Fata, Richard Lintner and Joel ****ing Bouchard.
Anyway, rant aside, losing Kovalev had to do with the league economics, but the "for nothing" part was because Craig Patrick sucked at selling.