So I've created a couple of d-men threads on the NHL Talk board, and Pietrangelo's name always seems to come up for either Norris contention or best d-men in the league going forward. But often I've seen people mention that he's not playing well this year. Is this assessment correct, and if so, what has caused the regression from him after the outstanding year he had last year?
Last year, he was the NHL's best defenseman. He or Shea Weber. And it was because he actually played defense. I understand that at this point in time we consider the "best" "defenseman" to be the best 4th forward who starts the play from a little farther behind, but in no way were Karlsson & Pietrangelo's defensive games even comparable. One was elite, one was very, very average.
This year, he has tried to play like Karlsson. His offense the first 15 games or so was great ... great in the sense of collecting points. If he went boldly forward on the rush (pretty much every rush) and then the puck winds up heading the other way, that's not that big a deal. This has been asked of our beat writer repeatedly in chats and he always says it's because "these guys are offensive guys" but that's IMO him not wanting to criticize Pietrangelo. (Tonight on Twitter he began to post stats about Pietrangelo's unacceptably bad defense, so maybe that will change.) Yeah, no big deal we're letting play after play go odd man rush the other way. This player, I am not sure who he is, but he's aggressively NOT in the Norris consideration. Frankly, it's pretty transparently an attempt to get personal stats going into a HUGE contract year.
But he will continue to get mentions because of the points. Carefully watch the analysts who hype him for that award this year – these are the guys who definitively are terrible hockey analysts and you shouldn't trust them.
All this said, it's extremely difficult for us to believe he isn't the defenseman we saw for two years prior to this year. Blues fans understand he's a gifted player who is just making bad decisions right now. When we ask the beat writer whether this is purposeful, he seems to say Hitchcock and the coaching staff want him to play like that, but that's almost impossible to believe. They watch the games too, they see the wreckage of losses and standing drops based on this factor, as well as the goaltending and an overall weak LHD group. So will he turn it around? Sooner or later he will but this year the concept of a Norris is a joke. Shattenkirk easily deserves it over him this year, and Shattenkirk should only be mentioned in the top 10 or so defensemen, not Norris talk.