Alex Burmistrov (Part II)
- Thread starter YWGinYYZ
- Start date
- Jun 10, 2014
- 58,478
- 30,520
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
Last 23 games:
54.7 Corsi and 1.7 p/60
**** Burmi... please just do this all year now on please.
54.7 Corsi and 1.7 p/60
**** Burmi... please just do this all year now on please.
Gil Fisher
Registered User
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
I'd guess mostly Dano, Armia, Stafford, and Perreault (most common last 10 games at least).
Some others though as we've been juggling lines a lot the last 23 games.
Samcanadian
Registered User
- Dec 13, 2011
- 2,849
- 183
Ok, that makes a lot of sense. Matches the eye test for sure.
Thanks doodz. I love when confirmation bias can be backed up with Corsi.
Evil Little
Registered User
- Jan 22, 2014
- 6,311
- 2,739
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
Samcanadian
Registered User
- Dec 13, 2011
- 2,849
- 183
He's an affodable option for bottom 6 next year. I like him as a depth guy if he continues to put up these numbers. Exactly what the Jets need.
Evil Little
Registered User
- Jan 22, 2014
- 6,311
- 2,739
Skidooboy
Registered User
No!
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!
Continue to stink and then just fade away.
We were a better team without him, we will be a better team without him again.
I don't car what the stats say.
were still hoping for this kid, he's not some 19yr old rookie. I have no desire to develop him anymore. he isn't what we need him to be he has never been what we need him to be.
go away. take your "glimpses" with you.
it'll be the same next year. another busted season with "glimpse" of what he could be.
NO NO NO NOPE NEVER NO
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!
Continue to stink and then just fade away.
We were a better team without him, we will be a better team without him again.
I don't car what the stats say.
were still hoping for this kid, he's not some 19yr old rookie. I have no desire to develop him anymore. he isn't what we need him to be he has never been what we need him to be.
go away. take your "glimpses" with you.
it'll be the same next year. another busted season with "glimpse" of what he could be.
NO NO NO NOPE NEVER NO
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
"I don't care about what the stats say" is a funny statement in a game where stats is everything:
Most goals win.
Most goals win.
Very nice. This was what I was expecting / hoping for when he came back. Something seems to have clicked with him, beyond getting better linemates to outlet to.
He almost seems to enjoy throwing the puck at the net lately.
I think we probably should have expected him to take some time to figure out the NHL again, I just had no idea it would be as bad or as long as it was. This recent stretch probably has aspects of a hot streak and linemates, but it's clear he's figuring it out.
Skidooboy
Registered User
Yeah and you've been using "stats" to defend a guy who doesn't score ever.for Years now.
This guy was Tim Stapleton light his last years in the K and you were still saying how good he was and would be.
Now after a season of utter uselessness he has a bit of a run, in games with absolutely no meaning whatsoever, games we are still losing I might add, and what He's suddenly a great asset?
No thanks. trade him for a bag of pucks and wave good-bye.
pucka lucka
Registered User
YOu know that stats just quantify reality. I am not sure what in heck you could possibly mean by stats to defend a guy. The stats just count and average things that happen on the ice. Care to come up with some measure to back your opinion?
Skidooboy
Registered User
I have repeatedly stated that this Kid is a bust.
265 games with 76 points type bust. - 15 bust. "Difficult to play with" bust. Benched in the KHL bust.
When I mention that, the advance stat guys start bringing up corsi/fenwick+TOI/QC 7XBGY stats that PROVE AB is a good player. He isn't
He's got almost 300 games in and nothing much to show for it. How long are we gonna wait for him to "get it".
He's a bust, Bad draft choice, the pundits were wrong. It happens.
He's easily replaceable with a hundred other guys who don't have the special needs or understanding from coaching about "developing in the Russian system" or whatever Maurice said in his last interview.
Move on.
pucka lucka
Registered User
Skidooboy
Registered User
ummm yeah I do. maybe you didn't read my post. I'll reiterate.
76 points in 265 games and exactly 0 seasons with 30 or more points.
and 1 season with 13 goals.
got any stats to refute that?
CaptainChef
Registered User
Let me guess - was that about the same time that he became detached from Thorburn
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
No.
All I did was point out his teammates scored more and outscored more with him. Not using Corsi or "corsi/fenwick+TOI/QC 7XBGY"... just linemate scoring and outscoring.
Well that and I also showed why by looking at his neutral zone transitional results.
He has a bit of a run, but we should point out that his run is more like 2011-13.
I do find it funny though that you are using a team stat (wins) to argue your point...
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
Gil Fisher
Registered User
this is prior to this year...
he was legitimately useful
you should post this in the stafford thread as well....probably worth discussing
