Zats Muccarello
Grinder
His puck skills are way better than he gets credit for.
his hands are silky smooth
His puck skills are way better than he gets credit for.
It's actually not.Adam Fox is a great player. What I don't understand is why the moderators shut down the Anthony DeAnglelo Appreication Thread. Sounds like a first amendment issue.
I agree. I’ve actually written my congressman about this.Adam Fox is a great player. What I don't understand is why the moderators shut down the Anthony DeAnglelo Appreication Thread. Sounds like a first amendment issue.
Adam Fox is a great player. What I don't understand is why the moderators shut down the Anthony DeAnglelo Appreication Thread. Sounds like a first amendment issue.
I would. But it looks like rain....I think you should make that very clear and storm a building.
I would. But it looks like rain....
Adam Fox is a great player. What I don't understand is why the moderators shut down the Anthony DeAnglelo Appreication Thread. Sounds like a first amendment issue.
Including, as this past week showed, some members of the US Senate.I think too many people don't understand how the first amendment works. lol
I was being inclusive of that lolIncluding, as this past week showed, some members of the US Senate.
I mean...I was reading a projection for USA’s next Olympic team via The Athletic, and thought this was hilarious:
“On defense, it’s another thank you to those guys — and this one is real — for leaving me a top pair. Zach Werenski’s slow start notwithstanding, he and Adam Fox are a no-brainer. One can run a power play, and the other appears to already be capable of everything.”
![]()
The only "negatives" I can dig up with Fox are
1. He isn't a burner
2. He isn't great defending in front of his own net.
The former isn't even a problem as he still finds ways to create space for him self and get around players. He doesn't really get beat very often so the recovery speed hasn't really been necessary either.
So its really just the second one.
Is there any case to be made importing the entire Lindgren-Fox pair and deploying them as such in the Olympics?I was reading a projection for USA’s next Olympic team via The Athletic, and thought this was hilarious:
“On defense, it’s another thank you to those guys — and this one is real — for leaving me a top pair. Zach Werenski’s slow start notwithstanding, he and Adam Fox are a no-brainer. One can run a power play, and the other appears to already be capable of everything.”
![]()
The 2nd one is why you pair him up someone big who can clear out the front, or Lindgren, who plays as if he is twice his own size.The only "negatives" I can dig up with Fox are
1. He isn't a burner
2. He isn't great defending in front of his own net.
The former isn't even a problem as he still finds ways to create space for him self and get around players. He doesn't really get beat very often so the recovery speed hasn't really been necessary either.
So its really just the second one.