TheKrebsCycle
Throwing Confetti for Perfetti
Either would be an epic battle but the focus is herePlease start chanting "we want Florida" or "we want Tampa"
Either would be an epic battle but the focus is herePlease start chanting "we want Florida" or "we want Tampa"
Sure whatever helps you sleep at night. Just remember...we dusted you off last night with our B or C game lolWell, when you lose the series you should rename your team to the “Toronto we lose to Morons” team
This chirp has the same effort the sens put in their game last night...maybe even less lolWell, when you lose the series you should rename your team to the “Toronto we lose to Morons” team
"tHeY wOn'T wIn tHiS rOuNd pLaYiNg sOfT LiKe tHaT."Toronto won by being soft, the Tanev and Matthews dives did good for them. Good for the Leaves, but they won't win this round playing soft like that. They'll keep trying though.
"tHeY wOn'T wIn tHiS rOuNd pLaYiNg sOfT LiKe tHaT."
-After winning Game 1 6-2.
He thinks calls are consistent game to game lol. Sens fans are in for a rude awakening. It will be different refs who will have different standards game 2. Frustrating thing about the playoffs.
Sens players are better off burning the tape and not expecting them to get the calls
Well disagreed. According to Natural Statrick, high danger chances were 13 vs 10 for Toronto, expected goals were 3.55 vs 3.39 for Ottawa. But then, 5v5: high danger chances were 6 vs 5 for Ottawa, expected goals 2.47 vs 1.34 for Ottawa.
So yeah, Ottawa controlled 5v5, but their goaltending was brutal and they also sucked on the PK.
A lot of people who have never heard of score effects before in this thread lolOutside of penalty on Tanev, every other penalty Ottawa took would had be pretty easily call by any ref.
Ottawa tried to do the same thing Florida team did but they're a difference between playing a smart physical game and just be undisciplined
Until 4-1 goal leafs was in control and slow down with 3 goal lead
gm overal
View attachment 1018943
5v5
View attachment 1018944
Calling a team meeting after a single playoff game, and announcing it in the media, is absurd.
If the Leafs keep getting out chanced vs the Send in 5-on-5 they better throw a parade for winning this series.I can't agree with the 5v5 talk. It's cope to me. After the first 2 periods the shot chart 5v5 showed a clear picture. The Sens outchanced the Leafs but all of it was from low danger areas. Leafs kept them outside almost the whole game.
It wasn't until the 3rd they were really pushing and the Leafs were defending a multi goal lead they evened up the high danger chances but at that point of the game, the Leafs were just holding their structure and defending the lead and not pushing much anymore.
Once again, Leaf fans are asking non fans to understand we have been outshot and "out chanced" most games this year. But the underlying numbers show the high danger chances are in our favor.
Are you referring to this?
That’s embarrassing for you.
1 for Batherson's cross check. Batherson's trip and Nylander's hook already balance and a high stick is a high stick.I think we’re owed about 4 makeup calls in Game 2, soooo![]()
If anyone took a step back and looked at this match-up objectively, there wouldn't be much to talk about. It is a mismatch in a lot of areas, most importantly goaltending, special teams and timely scoring. It will be surprising if it goes past 5 games.Interesting that the Sens apparently have the ability to be better but the Leafs don't moving forward in this series.
I’d imagine the refs will review the footage and see OEL and Matthews dives. Even if it’s different refs, they don’t like to be shown up like that and the Leafs will probably have a hard time getting those calls after.1 for Batherson's cross check. Batherson's trip and Nylander's hook already balance and a high stick is a high stick.
The first three - You don't get even up calls for blatant stupidity.
Why? Is it a fake account?