JackSlater
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2010
- 19,790
- 15,437
[MOD]
You haven't given a reason why the players are to blame, just a firm lack of reasoning and consistency. The players didn't negotiate in the CBA to participate in 2014, and yet they still went. What has changed? The players are still willing to go. The owners are not willing. If they went last time and the position of the players didn't change, then the players are not the reason that NHL participation has ceased. The owners changed (in part initially due to the IOC) position, which is why participation is ending. Blaming the players for not forcing the NHL to participate is so obviously ridiculous that it's hard to believe anyone is gullible enough to do so.
Both A and B must agree to X for X to happen. A agrees to X. B does not agree to X. Who is to blame for X not happening? Obviously B. It makes literally no sense to say that A is to blame because it didn't force B.
A reasonable person notices the players didn't negotiate Olympic participation in the current CBA despite having done so previously (who cares if you're willing to go do something you want to and your employees doesn't want to give you the time off and you didn't negotiate for it when you had previously...to me that sounds like you're stupid, not hard done by); IMO supporting the players as innocent is asinine
You haven't given a reason why the players are to blame, just a firm lack of reasoning and consistency. The players didn't negotiate in the CBA to participate in 2014, and yet they still went. What has changed? The players are still willing to go. The owners are not willing. If they went last time and the position of the players didn't change, then the players are not the reason that NHL participation has ceased. The owners changed (in part initially due to the IOC) position, which is why participation is ending. Blaming the players for not forcing the NHL to participate is so obviously ridiculous that it's hard to believe anyone is gullible enough to do so.
Both A and B must agree to X for X to happen. A agrees to X. B does not agree to X. Who is to blame for X not happening? Obviously B. It makes literally no sense to say that A is to blame because it didn't force B.
Last edited by a moderator: