9 States with No Income Tax - NHL CAP

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
23,297
15,538
Southwestern Ontario
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".

Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.

Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.

Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?
 
Last edited:

supsens

Registered User
Oct 6, 2013
6,577
2,001
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes.

Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightening.

Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP rules plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.

Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?

They have no state tax they have fedral tax.
 

HBK27

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2005
14,071
15,026
Northern NJ
NHL has indicated they have no interest in going down this road.

Personally, I would prefer they do something about it, but it is highly unlikely. It would complicate things with trades, make the cap more difficult for fans to understand, etc. And then would you only "punish" the non-state tax teams or would you also adjust for different tax rates by state? Then, how do you handle the US-Canadian exchange rate?

It's just going to be one of many inequalities, just as players wanting to play in a bigger market, nicer weather, for their hometown teams, etc. also provides different levels of advantages for teams as well.
 

Colezuki

Registered User
Apr 27, 2009
9,770
6,627
Toronto
NHL has indicated they have no interest in going down this road.

Personally, I would prefer they do something about it, but it is highly unlikely. It would complicate things with trades, make the cap more difficult for fans to understand, etc. And then would you only "punish" the non-state tax teams or would you also adjust for different tax rates by state? Then, how do you handle the US-Canadian exchange rate?

It's just going to be one of many inequalities, just as players wanting to play in a bigger market, nicer weather, for their hometown teams, etc. also provides different levels of advantages for teams as well.
Us CAD is not relevant due to all contracts in USD unless your talking COL?
 

North Cole

♧ Lem
Jan 22, 2017
11,832
13,496
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".

Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.

Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.

Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?

Will they also consider the tax advantage teams have from making most of the contract a signing bonus?

Probably a resounding no for both.

tumblr_mdqyomUDzm1ry61na.gif
 

pbgoalie

Registered User
Aug 8, 2010
5,989
3,574
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".

Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.

Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.

Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?

preds and stars are hiding
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,229
11,319
Us CAD is not relevant due to all contracts in USD unless your talking COL?

The very fact that all contracts are in USD kinda proves the point though doesn’t it?

If the actual point of the Sarah cap was equality(and it really isn’t) then the NHL would do something about this obvious advantage that certain teams have.

But they won’t because that isn’t what the salary cap is all about anyways.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad