9 States with No Income Tax - NHL CAP

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
24,249
17,067
Southwestern Ontario
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".

Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.

Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.

Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?
 
Last edited:
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes.

Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightening.

Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP rules plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.

Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?

They have no state tax they have fedral tax.
 
NHL has indicated they have no interest in going down this road.

Personally, I would prefer they do something about it, but it is highly unlikely. It would complicate things with trades, make the cap more difficult for fans to understand, etc. And then would you only "punish" the non-state tax teams or would you also adjust for different tax rates by state? Then, how do you handle the US-Canadian exchange rate?

It's just going to be one of many inequalities, just as players wanting to play in a bigger market, nicer weather, for their hometown teams, etc. also provides different levels of advantages for teams as well.
 
NHL has indicated they have no interest in going down this road.

Personally, I would prefer they do something about it, but it is highly unlikely. It would complicate things with trades, make the cap more difficult for fans to understand, etc. And then would you only "punish" the non-state tax teams or would you also adjust for different tax rates by state? Then, how do you handle the US-Canadian exchange rate?

It's just going to be one of many inequalities, just as players wanting to play in a bigger market, nicer weather, for their hometown teams, etc. also provides different levels of advantages for teams as well.
Us CAD is not relevant due to all contracts in USD unless your talking COL?
 
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".

Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.

Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.

Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?

Will they also consider the tax advantage teams have from making most of the contract a signing bonus?

Probably a resounding no for both.

tumblr_mdqyomUDzm1ry61na.gif
 
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming — have no income taxes "state".

Kraken, Knights, Panthers, and the Lightning.

Each of these teams have a clear advantage over the rest of the league. Each of these teams work within CAP framework plus added room when one factor's tax break to negotiate contracts.

Is this something the NHL will consider next collective agreement?

preds and stars are hiding
 
Us CAD is not relevant due to all contracts in USD unless your talking COL?

The very fact that all contracts are in USD kinda proves the point though doesn’t it?

If the actual point of the Sarah cap was equality(and it really isn’t) then the NHL would do something about this obvious advantage that certain teams have.

But they won’t because that isn’t what the salary cap is all about anyways.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad