Prospect Info: 6th Overall Pick: Pavel Zacha

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Glad everyone is content with Zacha. Remember Barzal?

I mean, if we drafted Barzal all this talk would be about him and not Zacha. Then we could say, remember Zacha?

A high-caliber forward prospect is exactly what we were all clamoring for. We got one in Zacha, and could have got one in Barzal if we went that route.
 
I mean, if we drafted Barzal all this talk would be about him and not Zacha. Then we could say, remember Zacha?

A high-caliber forward prospect is exactly what we were all clamoring for. We got one in Zacha, and could have got one in Barzal if we went that route.

But Zacha is the third best forward in the draft, and Barzal, well Barzal's stock precipitated rather swiftly. :laugh:
 
But Zacha is the third best forward in the draft, and Barzal, well Barzal's stock precipitated rather swiftly. :laugh:

An extremely lofty statement to say mere weeks after the draft. And other prospects' "stocks" have fallen in the past only for them to prove teams wrong, it means nothing to me that he went 16th.

I'm very happy with Zacha, but I would've be happy with Barzal too.
 
There is nothing to be gained by having him here, especially since he played a whopping 37 games last year. We all want to play with our shiny new toy right away, but his development is critical to our future success and I don't want him here this year. Let him play a full season in Sarnia/Albany and dominate. Then we will have a more polished, finished player for 2016-17, when we MIGHT be in the discussion for a playoff spot.

All we need to do is look at the litany of prospects from our own organization that were rushed and had their development stalled or ruined. You want to give him a little taste with those 9 games at the beginning of the season, fine. But that's it.

Plus, there's no need to start the clock on this guy any earlier than we need to.

Was it not beneficial to both the Bruins and Pastrnak's development to have him up with the big club last year?
 
I mean, if we drafted Barzal all this talk would be about him and not Zacha. Then we could say, remember Zacha?

A high-caliber forward prospect is exactly what we were all clamoring for. We got one in Zacha, and could have got one in Barzal if we went that route.

Thing is there was a lot more skepticism of Barzal here even before the draft and that'd still be an issue with the size. Plus Zacha has gone above and beyond the call kissing up to us (the fans), taking the red eye from the draft to go to the sth thing and all that so we're even more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.
 
Thing is there was a lot more skepticism of Barzal here even before the draft and that'd still be an issue with the size. Plus Zacha has gone above and beyond the call kissing up to us (the fans), taking the red eye from the draft to go to the sth thing and all that so we're even more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Agreed. Although to be fair, most (if not all) the skepticism surrounding Zacha is based on his production, and we haven't really gotten a chance to critique that further. We knew his size, skill, and skating was top notch, just whether he can piece it together - and the jury is still out on that, but I'm very hopeful he can.

I do really appreciate how much love he's expending towards the Devils and the community. That's something I don't think Barzal would've done. Zacha has been great since day one in expressing how thrilled he is to part of the Devils. It doesn't really help him on the ice, but if he keeps it up he'll be a fan favourite in no time (if he isn't already).
 
Was it not beneficial to both the Bruins and Pastrnak's development to have him up with the big club last year?

Perhaps, but the Devils really have to nail this pick. I think it makes more sense to take the time and develop him properly rather than throw him to the dogs right away. There is no downside to sending him back to junior, because you can be sure that the Devils will be keeping tabs on him and helping him develop while he's back in Sarnia too.

Besides, Zacha doesn't turn this team into a playoff contender and he'll likely be benched a lot. I don't see a ton of benefit having him up here other than playing with Elias and if they really want that, then give him 9 games and send him back.
 
Perhaps, but the Devils really have to nail this pick. I think it makes more sense to take the time and develop him properly rather than throw him to the dogs right away. There is no downside to sending him back to junior, because you can be sure that the Devils will be keeping tabs on him and helping him develop while he's back in Sarnia too.

Besides, Zacha doesn't turn this team into a playoff contender and he'll likely be benched a lot. I don't see a ton of benefit having him up here other than playing with Elias and if they really want that, then give him 9 games and send him back.

Drives me nuts when people throw this garbage out there when Shero and Hynes have been on record indicating the exact opposite.

If he carves a spot for himself, he plays. If there are people outplaying him, he goes down. He will get a cup of coffee in the NHL, that's for certain. But if it's clear he needs more time in the O, he'll get it.

He will absolutely not be benched. Where did you come up with that?
 
But Zacha is the third best forward in the draft, and Barzal, well Barzal's stock precipitated rather swiftly. :laugh:

Not that I'm rooting against Zacha, but this argument is just too ridiculous to ignore. Parise's stock also "precipitated rather swiftly" in his draft...how'd that work out for teams picking other players above him?
 
Drives me nuts when people throw this garbage out there when Shero and Hynes have been on record indicating the exact opposite.

If he carves a spot for himself, he plays. If there are people outplaying him, he goes down. He will get a cup of coffee in the NHL, that's for certain. But if it's clear he needs more time in the O, he'll get it.

He will absolutely not be benched. Where did you come up with that?

I don't blame the poster for that. It's been the norm for the past several seasons.

We'll all be shocked about how much playing time these kids really get soon enough. I'm looking forward to it.
 
Drives me nuts when people throw this garbage out there when Shero and Hynes have been on record indicating the exact opposite.

If he carves a spot for himself, he plays. If there are people outplaying him, he goes down. He will get a cup of coffee in the NHL, that's for certain. But if it's clear he needs more time in the O, he'll get it.

He will absolutely not be benched. Where did you come up with that?

He's a rookie in the NHL, learning the game and has spent a grand total of 37 games in North America. He's going to make mistakes and he'll likely be inconsistent and you can't continue to let him make mistakes if he isn't learning from them. That takes time in the video room and practice. It's not garbage, it's the way things are done at the pro level. You don't let somebody continue to make the same mistakes especially when it's the coaches job to win. You don't like what I have to say, fine, but don't be delusional.
 
Zacha is a nice prospect who has high potential but I still believe it was a reach. When Shero mentioned Jordan Staal I nearly puked.

I dont think that. Once you got passed the first 5, the next 6 were all really close prospect wise. I believe Zacha would have gone at 7 to the Flyers, i believe they were also high on him.

Hell Barzal went at 16! Everyone thought the Devils would take him at 6.
 
More than win I think this coaching staffs job is to teach and develop. I think they will be judged on that rather than the win loss record. I think even a good portion of the fans are on board with this.
 
Do we even know if he is allowed to go back to Sarnia?

It's unclear.

He was technically on loan from his Czech team to Sarnia last year. If you look at Julius Honka's situation, he was drafted from the WHL (Swift Current Broncos) but he was also on a one-year loan. So his player rights where technically held by his SM-liga team in Finland. Therefore, he was not technically a CHL player so he was eligible for the AHL.

No one has really clarified Zacha's status completely, so we probably won't know until some reputable source posts something.
 
He's a rookie in the NHL, learning the game and has spent a grand total of 37 games in North America. He's going to make mistakes and he'll likely be inconsistent and you can't continue to let him make mistakes if he isn't learning from them. That takes time in the video room and practice. It's not garbage, it's the way things are done at the pro level. You don't let somebody continue to make the same mistakes especially when it's the coaches job to win. You don't like what I have to say, fine, but don't be delusional.

You're correct. If he's making mistakes, he'll be sent back after 9 games.

I'm saying that, if he's up with the club for the whole year, he won't be benched. Because he will have shown in the 9 games that he's not making the mistakes you're alluding to.

But if he is making mistakes, he'll be sent back. I don't think Hynes & Co will be intent on benching an 18 year old when he could be developing in a lesser league.

Not sure what's so delusional about that.
 
You're correct. If he's making mistakes, he'll be sent back after 9 games.

I'm saying that, if he's up with the club for the whole year, he won't be benched. Because he will have shown in the 9 games that he's not making the mistakes you're alluding to.

But if he is making mistakes, he'll be sent back. I don't think Hynes & Co will be intent on benching an 18 year old when he could be developing in a lesser league.

Not sure what's so delusional about that.

You know its entirely possible he lights the world on fire those first 9 games and then struggles to find consistency? It's a long season with a lot of ups and downs. Even Henrique got benched a few times in his second season. You think they're going to let a guy keep making the same mistakes because he had a good 9 games in the beginning of the season?
 
I might get roasted for saying this, but I don't think I'd mind if Zacha was benched for a few games here and there his first season in the NHL as long as he understood why and the coaching staff was working with him to address the problem(s). With Larsson, I think what got frustrating for me was that there didn't seem to be enough teaching and explaining going on behind the scenes with DeBoer.
 
I might get roasted for saying this, but I don't think I'd mind if Zacha was benched for a few games here and there his first season in the NHL as long as he understood why and the coaching staff was working with him to address the problem(s). With Larsson, I think what got frustrating for me was that there didn't seem to be enough teaching and explaining going on behind the scenes with DeBoer.

definitely agree, so long as hynes is teaching him and gives him a bit of responsibility at a time. even 3rd line minutes for a few games is fine. I just want him to grow
 
Interesting that Zacha may be ahl eligible. Would be good to confirm.

TG said he tried last week to get in touch with the GM of Zacha's Czech team but he was on vacation last week.

So we will probably find out soon, but as of right now, there's a solid chance he can be in the OHL, AHL, or NHL. It's a bit of unique situation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad