Prospect Info: 47OA: Brady Cleveland

newfy

Registered User
Jul 28, 2010
15,007
8,802
I wouldn't want them to have to score 20, but I would want them to take a regular shift. They need to take 10-12 minutes a night without their shifts being white knucklers hoping they don't get routinely burned. If they can PK then all the better.

Thats the problem though, people would have this stance while trotting out Jacob de la rose,, Emmerton or whoever... despite those guys leaving you white knuckling without providing much of anything.

Like people this year saying Kostin isnt good enough at hockey, despite the fact that he had very good analytics and played well. If you can fight, half the people on ths board dont hold you to the same standard of other players
 
  • Like
Reactions: Murmansk16A

letsgowings9999

Registered User
May 13, 2023
660
392
Raymond hat trick tonight

Side note just cause I heard his name... cant believe czarnik is here lmao f***en lalonde
 

Jersey Fan 12

Positive Vibes
Nov 20, 2006
7,214
3,134
The trade of.Andrew Gibson made me curious about Cleveland. Disappointing (but understandable) that he was not invited to USA Hockey's summer showcase following his freshman season at Wisconsin.

Will be interesting to see how things go for him at Colorado College.

Clearly he could have benefited from a year of.junior hockey before joining the Badgers.

But the competition level in the NCHC and a year of physical maturity and perhaps an opportunity to see more ice time could help him reach the potential Detroit scouts envisioned.
 
Last edited:

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,110
821
Brady should have spent another year in junior.* He went to Wisconsin to play for Granato and his asst, who were near immediately canned. He, and two others are now transferred.







* Very few 18 year olds play in the NCAA,.


Adultish NCAA hockey players - a problem?​


NCAA hockey has evolved tremendously over the past 20-30 years. The path for most college players now seems to be Junior A/B hockey, with many, many players playing Junior A until their eligibility runs out at age 20. Very few players go from a high school program directly into college.
This has led to significant age creep in NCAA players. There are currently only 36 NCAA players out of 3,875 who are 17 or 18 years old - the age when most students enter college, give or take. There are 106 who are 19 and 380 who are 20. Most players are 21 (945), 22 (936) and 23 (850). There are 507 players who are 24, 114 who are 25, and 1 who is 26 years old!
So it appears as though NCAA hockey players, on average, are about 4 years older than typical college students.



 

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,146
8,292
Bellingham, WA
Brady should have spent another year in junior.* He went to Wisconsin to play for Granato and his asst, who were near immediately canned. He, and two others are now transferred.







* Very few 18 year olds play in the NCAA,.


Adultish NCAA hockey players - a problem?​


NCAA hockey has evolved tremendously over the past 20-30 years. The path for most college players now seems to be Junior A/B hockey, with many, many players playing Junior A until their eligibility runs out at age 20. Very few players go from a high school program directly into college.
This has led to significant age creep in NCAA players. There are currently only 36 NCAA players out of 3,875 who are 17 or 18 years old - the age when most students enter college, give or take. There are 106 who are 19 and 380 who are 20. Most players are 21 (945), 22 (936) and 23 (850). There are 507 players who are 24, 114 who are 25, and 1 who is 26 years old!
So it appears as though NCAA hockey players, on average, are about 4 years older than typical college students.





I'm guessing a lot of them are USHL or junior B players, like Hirose.

Still, it's disappointing for a second round pick to get healthy scratched and put up zero offense when he did get a chance to play. Didn't like the pick and still don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heyfolks

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,110
821
I'm guessing a lot of them are USHL or junior B players, like Hirose.

Still, it's disappointing for a second round pick to get healthy scratched and put up zero offense when he did get a chance to play. Didn't like the pick and still don't.

While I agree on the healthy scratch, he has never (and will never) put up points. What I don't like is this first step, because it indicates he is getting bad counsel. Everyone knew Granato was on his way out, but he signed anyway. Further, Hirose types at 22 are still a challenge for most 18 year-olds. He should have stuck in juniors. A tough course correct for a guy who needs every eligible game he can get to develop.

As for the pick, I have no idea why they drafted him at 47, when all indicators lead one to believe he would have been available at 147.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Realgud

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,146
8,292
Bellingham, WA
While I agree on the healthy scratch, he has never (and will never) put up points. What I don't like is this first step, because it indicates he is getting bad counsel. Everyone knew Granato was on his way out, but he signed anyway. Further, Hirose types at 22 are still a challenge for most 18 year-olds. He should have stuck in juniors. A tough course correct for a guy who needs every eligible game he can get to develop.

As for the pick, I have no idea why they drafted him at 47, when all indicators lead one to believe he would have been available at 147.

Yeah, at 147 this thread would have died pretty quick. This draft he waited until 144 to pick Whipple.

I don't think we're the only ones who've noticed Draper's picks (especially 2nd rounders) are putting up really low point numbers.
 

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,110
821



THIS is EXACTLY why Cleveland should have stayed in the USHL!


Fun Facts - Average Age​


Team
Avg. Age​
1.Stonehill
23y 2m​
2.Lindenwood
23y 1m​
3.St. Thomas
23y 0m​
4.Niagara
22y 11m​
5.Bowling Green
22y 10m​
6.Bentley
22y 9m​
7.Alaska-Anchorage
22y 8m​
8.Long Island
22y 7m​
9.Mercyhurst
22y 6m​
10.Ferris State
22y 6m​
11.Mass.-Lowell
22y 6m​
12.Canisius
22y 6m​
13.RIT
22y 6m​
14.Army
22y 5m​
15.Union
22y 5m​
16.St. Lawrence
22y 5m​
17.Augustana
22y 4m​
18.Sacred Heart
22y 4m​
19.Alaska
22y 4m​
20.Colgate
22y 4m​
21.American Int'l
22y 4m​
22.Minnesota State
22y 4m​
23.Northern Michigan
22y 3m​
24.Robert Morris
22y 2m​
25.Lake Superior
22y 2m​
26.Clarkson
22y 2m​
27.Bemidji State
22y 2m​
28.New Hampshire
22y 1m​
29.St. Cloud State
22y 0m​
30.Brown
22y 0m​
31.Miami
22y 0m​
32.Rensselaer
21y 11m​
33.Merrimack
21y 11m​
34.Air Force
21y 11m​
35.Vermont
21y 11m​
36.Yale
21y 10m​
37.Providence
21y 10m​
38.Michigan Tech
21y 10m​
39.Omaha
21y 10m​
40.Holy Cross
21y 10m​
41.Ohio State
21y 10m​
42.Dartmouth
21y 9m​
43.Princeton
21y 9m​
44.Maine
21y 9m​
45.Notre Dame
21y 8m​
46.Wisconsin
21y 8m​
47.Cornell
21y 8m​
48.Western Michigan
21y 8m​
49.Arizona State
21y 7m​
50.Massachusetts
21y 7m​
51.North Dakota
21y 6m​
52.Connecticut
21y 6m​
53.Northeastern
21y 5m​
54.Minnesota-Duluth
21y 4m​
55.Michigan
21y 3m​
56.Harvard
21y 3m​
57.Quinnipiac
21y 3m​
58.Colorado College
21y 3m​
59.Minnesota
21y 1m​
60.Penn State
21y 1m​
61.Boston University
20y 10m​
62.Michigan State
20y 10m​
63.Denver
20y 9m​
64.Boston College
20y 7m​



 

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,110
821
BC has played in every game for Colorado College, is a +3, has 1 point, they are 9-2 and ranked #8.

I know, for some, the eulogy has been written, the grave dug and the head stone ordered but I still see this guy in Detroit. That move to Wisconsin was ill advised and he can ill afford a year's worth of development being only in practice, but that is behind him. He'll likely need all 3 years at CC and whatever remains as waiver exempt, contract, whatever in GR.







“Cleveland shows as a bit of a solid but unspectacular defenseman who didn’t stand out in a positive or negative manner in this one. He saw very limited ice time as the team’s seventh defenseman, but still remained effective when hopping over the boards.”


“He’s a huge, long, mean, tough, and physical defenseman. He’s going to play in the NHL as a match, shut down that kills penalties and impacts games with his physicality and defending. He won’t be a guy that scores or points but he’s going to be a really valuable player in the NHL and will make highlights with his hitting.”






To use the famed language of former General Manager Dean Lombardi, Cleveland “checks a lot of boxes.” He plays left defense, has size, plays with grit, and provides a steadying presence on the blueline. While comparisons always need to be careful, it’s safe to consider roles a person is projected to play. In Cleveland’s case, there’s the potential he could grow into a left-handed version of Matt Greene.

 
Last edited:

izlez

Carter Mazur Fan Club
Feb 28, 2012
5,076
4,079
BC has played in every game for Colorado College, is a +3, has 7 points, they are 9-2 and ranked #8.
While I'm a Brady supporter and am not overly concerned about his offense (there are plenty of defensive defenseman who only luck into points with cheap secondary assists and pucks bouncing off skates), our boy most certainly does not have 7 points this year.
 

schuelma24

Registered User
Jul 14, 2023
1,008
1,739
While I'm a Brady supporter and am not overly concerned about his offense (there are plenty of defensive defenseman who only luck into points with cheap secondary assists and pucks bouncing off skates), our boy most certainly does not have 7 points this year.

Hey he was only off by 6! He does have A point.
 

lilidk

Registered User
Mar 4, 2008
11,073
4,301
While I'm a Brady supporter and am not overly concerned about his offense (there are plenty of defensive defenseman who only luck into points with cheap secondary assists and pucks bouncing off skates), our boy most certainly does not have 7 points this year.
I could only wish Chiarot just played defense and not to carry the puck, or try to be offensive
 
  • Like
Reactions: heyfolks

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,110
821
While I'm a Brady supporter and am not overly concerned about his offense (there are plenty of defensive defenseman who only luck into points with cheap secondary assists and pucks bouncing off skates), our boy most certainly does not have 7 points this year.


You are correct. It is ONE 1 point. I corrected it. I was looking at SH in the stat colm.
 

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,146
8,292
Bellingham, WA
While I'm a Brady supporter and am not overly concerned about his offense (there are plenty of defensive defenseman who only luck into points with cheap secondary assists and pucks bouncing off skates), our boy most certainly does not have 7 points this year.

Those secondary assists is an indication of being able to move the puck and pass. You know, skills a player needs to make the NHL. He needs to be putting up some points playing at a lower level, even the aforementioned Matt Greene put up 17 points in 40 games his D+2 season in college.
 

TheOctopusKid

Registered User
Sep 24, 2010
1,514
1,803
So full disclosure: I know literally nothing about this prospect nor have I ever seen him play, and only know anything about based upon a quick scan of this thread

Looking at this kid, he's basically projected a 6'5+ 200+, 19yo Stay-At-Home with a nasty physical streak and likes to hit? So this is is a guy who should be what when he's 25? 230? And it sounds like he's a pretty good skater? Was part of the USNDP...which obviously he was chosen because of his defense and not that miserable point production...so his D must be pretty good?

This is not good...because why? Do we not want a giant, physical, stay-at-home?
 

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,110
821
Those secondary assists is an indication of being able to move the puck and pass. You know, skills a player needs to make the NHL. He needs to be putting up some points playing at a lower level, even the aforementioned Matt Greene put up 17 points in 40 games his D+2 season in college.

Can we agree that his D+1 year was waste and this is his actual D+1? < He should have stayed in juniors for another year. I posted this up further ni the thread but less than 40 18 year olds play in the NCAA. He really doesn't have the skill set to be that exception. It was poor advise.

IF we can agree on that Matt had 4 points in his D+1.

 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,323
16,709
So full disclosure: I know literally nothing about this prospect nor have I ever seen him play, and only know anything about based upon a quick scan of this thread

Looking at this kid, he's basically projected a 6'5+ 200+, 19yo Stay-At-Home with a nasty physical streak and likes to hit? So this is is a guy who should be what when he's 25? 230? And it sounds like he's a pretty good skater? Was part of the USNDP...which obviously he was chosen because of his defense and not that miserable point production...so his D must be pretty good?

This is not good...because why? Do we not want a giant, physical, stay-at-home?
Because he has the puck handling of a goaltender. That's not going to cut it in the modern NHL. He'd fit right in to Lalonde's chip it out strategy... but that's not a winning strategy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedHawkDown

TheOctopusKid

Registered User
Sep 24, 2010
1,514
1,803
Because he has the puck handling of a goaltender. That's not going to cut it in the modern NHL. He'd fit right in to Lalonde's chip it out strategy... but that's not a winning strategy.

Got it, so he can't carry a puck. Is his passing equally as bad? Is it a lack of skill or acumen?
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,323
16,709
Got it, so he can't carry a puck. Is his passing equally as bad? Is it a lack of skill or acumen?
He may as well be using a goalie stick or no stick at all. He's a big body that hustles but that alone can only get you so far. Someone above posted Matt Greene in an attempt to raise hope for Brady but 1. Greene outproduced him at almost triple the rate in his draft year and 2. that was in 2002 when scoring was at almost half of what it is now for top end kids in Junior leagues and/or college.
 

TheOctopusKid

Registered User
Sep 24, 2010
1,514
1,803
He may as well be using a goalie stick or no stick at all. He's a big body that hustles but that alone can only get you so far. Someone above posted Matt Greene in an attempt to raise hope for Brady but 1. Greene outproduced him at almost triple the rate in his draft year and 2. that was in 2002 when scoring was at almost half of what it is now for top end kids in Junior leagues and/or college.
What about Oleksiak? Hes huge and a stay at home and provides zero offense contribution. I remember him as a junior and he didn’t do anything offensively either? Or is Cleveland much like the real Cleveland - sad and broken beyond repair?
 

Reddwit

Registered User
Feb 4, 2016
7,730
3,462
So full disclosure: I know literally nothing about this prospect nor have I ever seen him play, and only know anything about based upon a quick scan of this thread

Looking at this kid, he's basically projected a 6'5+ 200+, 19yo Stay-At-Home with a nasty physical streak and likes to hit? So this is is a guy who should be what when he's 25? 230? And it sounds like he's a pretty good skater? Was part of the USNDP...which obviously he was chosen because of his defense and not that miserable point production...so his D must be pretty good?

This is not good...because why? Do we not want a giant, physical, stay-at-home?
Who are we talking as a comp here? Gudas? Schenn? There aren’t many examples of that type in the NHL. Is it because they’re unicorns or is it that most guys that play this style just don’t make it in the bigs? I guess we’ll find out in a couple years.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,323
16,709
What about Oleksiak? Hes huge and a stay at home and provides zero offense contribution. I remember him as a junior and he didn’t do anything offensively either? Or is Cleveland much like the real Cleveland - sad and broken beyond repair?
Oleksiak had 13 points in the NCAA the season before he was drafted.

People underestimate the offense of "no-offense" NHLers prior to getting to the show. To have a guy putting up goalie numbers in Juniors as a skater is hard to overcome as it shows a complete lack of any puck moving ability. Again, Gudas mentioned just above, 37 points his draft year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Realgud

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,110
821
So full disclosure: I know literally nothing about this prospect nor have I ever seen him play, and only know anything about based upon a quick scan of this thread

Looking at this kid, he's basically projected a 6'5+ 200+, 19yo Stay-At-Home with a nasty physical streak and likes to hit? So this is is a guy who should be what when he's 25? 230? And it sounds like he's a pretty good skater? Was part of the USNDP...which obviously he was chosen because of his defense and not that miserable point production...so his D must be pretty good?

This is not good...because why? Do we not want a giant, physical, stay-at-home?

If on were listening to the actions of the Wings management team for the past 25 years, the answer is yes, we do not want a giant, physical, stay-at-home defensemen.

Some of us fans, disagree. If he is in the corner, he can impact the dump and chase game. He can impact the pressure the D or forwards game. The big question is does he have the feet and stick skills (first pass) to play as you state. Some on here think he would be available in the 6th round, but that isn't where he was ranked. I don't know if he lasts until the 4th or 5th round, but the scouting reports I read didn't have him over 100. Yet, none of that matters today. He was drafted for the exact role you present. If that is 9-11 minutes a game on the PK and against the 4th line and keeping the flies off, it will have been a good pick.
 

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,110
821
Who are we talking as a comp here? Gudas? Schenn? There aren’t many examples of that type in the NHL. Is it because they’re unicorns or is it that most guys that play this style just don’t make it in the bigs? I guess we’ll find out in a couple years.

Ryan Graves
Erik Johnson
Brando Carlo
Brett Pesce
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad