3v3 at the Olympics is Being Discussed

Canadienna

Registered User
Jan 27, 2015
13,183
18,639

Thought this was interesting enough to warrant its own thread.

I'm not sure about it to be honest. Ice Hockey is a 5v5 sport. Creating a separate event with a separate gold medal for a novelty mode of hockey seems wrong. On the other hand, it could grow the game and bring in people who wouldn't watch otherwise.

What does the HF hivemind think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eye of Ra

joelef

Registered User
Nov 22, 2011
2,097
883
This is becoming the norm in many Olympic sports now. Cutting cost, faster paste and potential higher participation is why shorter versions of sports are being added. This is why I think usopc sole focus on the ncaa is misguided
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
32,076
21,440
The fiba one feels super gimmicky. There’s a million Olympic events so it’s fine but it’s not super exciting unless they are somehow able to get NHLers doing double duty.
 

FrHockeyFan

Registered User
Dec 25, 2017
502
386
It's the version from the Youth Olympics played on sheet the size of an end zone. The IIHF has run a couple of test events last spring with more to come with a women's tourney in Brazil this week and plans for 8-team World Championships from 2026 onwards.


Here is a game from a test tournament in UK last April.

Personally, I like it as development tool. Not so much as a full Olympic event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canadienna

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,546
14,973
The basketball one sucked, so this one likely will too. If they could convince some NHLers to do it I'd have some interest but that's unlikely. I'd honestly rather see road hockey at the summer Olympics if they want another gimmicky hockey event.
 

Namejs

Registered User
Dec 24, 2011
4,292
1,004
Oslo
The fiba one feels super gimmicky. There’s a million Olympic events so it’s fine but it’s not super exciting unless they are somehow able to get NHLers doing double duty.
Streetball has been around for nearly a century. It started at the grassroots level, developed into actual pro leagues and only then was it introduced at the Olympics.

3x3 hockey is the exact opposite of that. It's not an actual sport.
 

Kane One

Registered User
Feb 6, 2010
43,912
11,853
Brooklyn, New NY
I have no issue with it.

There’s millions of medals up for grabs in swimming and gymnastics and only one for ice hockey? Everything at the NHL skills competition should be a medal event.
 

WayTooCold

Canada for gold
Jun 9, 2023
206
171
3 v 3 just eliminates all physical play. You'll hang on the puck forever. We can't steamroll ála Eric Lindros these other wimpy teams. As in 5 v 5.

Lesser countries have smaller talent pools. They might be able hang on w/ us a bit more.
 

Vikz

Registered User
Dec 26, 2021
231
320
I dont understand most of you people. You sound like grumpy old men who dont want any changes. I also dont understand people who said that 3v3 basketball did not work. I had a blast watching this one - high pace game that takes only 20 minutes or so, and there are several games a day - fantastic format for action packed event like the Olympics.

However, the main question for me here is player eligibility. As Namejs correctly pointed out, 3v3 basketball is a legit sport with professional leagues all over the world and athletes who specialize in it. Same with, lets say, beach volleyball. There are no 3v3 leagues, it is not a legit sport yet.

So, what are the scenarios?

1) Do it swimming, skiing, skating style, where same people perform in different disciplines? No chance. I dont think Michael Phelps valued his 100m gold medal more than his 400m gold medal. However, if McDavid has 3v3 vs Poland in the morning and a classic game against Sweden in the evening, we all know which of these games will be a practise. If he even decides to risk fatigue / injury by playing both.

2) Allow anyone to participate except those, who participate in the classic ice hockey event. So, McDavid is busy with the main team, while, lets say, Tavares, who was cut at the last moment, decides to go 3v3. Yeah, Canada, USA, Sweden, Russia, Finland, Czechia will have an unfair advantage with legit superstars. But dont they have it in classic hockey too?

3) Ban professional hockey players from playing 3v3. Countries would be able to ice teams consisting of players from half-professional leagues, but there could be controversy regarding where to draw the line and the quality of play might end up bad.

But heck, I would be glad to watch this fast and entertaining new game when you don't wait 2 days for your team to play just to end up with a 1-0 slog.
 

Namejs

Registered User
Dec 24, 2011
4,292
1,004
Oslo
I dont understand most of you people. You sound like grumpy old men who dont want any changes. I also dont understand people who said that 3v3 basketball did not work. I had a blast watching this one - high pace game that takes only 20 minutes or so, and there are several games a day - fantastic format for action packed event like the Olympics.

However, the main question for me here is player eligibility. As Namejs correctly pointed out, 3v3 basketball is a legit sport with professional leagues all over the world and athletes who specialize in it. Same with, lets say, beach volleyball. There are no 3v3 leagues, it is not a legit sport yet.

So, what are the scenarios?

1) Do it swimming, skiing, skating style, where same people perform in different disciplines? No chance. I dont think Michael Phelps valued his 100m gold medal more than his 400m gold medal. However, if McDavid has 3v3 vs Poland in the morning and a classic game against Sweden in the evening, we all know which of these games will be a practise. If he even decides to risk fatigue / injury by playing both.

2) Allow anyone to participate except those, who participate in the classic ice hockey event. So, McDavid is busy with the main team, while, lets say, Tavares, who was cut at the last moment, decides to go 3v3. Yeah, Canada, USA, Sweden, Russia, Finland, Czechia will have an unfair advantage with legit superstars. But dont they have it in classic hockey too?

3) Ban professional hockey players from playing 3v3. Countries would be able to ice teams consisting of players from half-professional leagues, but there could be controversy regarding where to draw the line and the quality of play might end up bad.

But heck, I would be glad to watch this fast and entertaining new game when you don't wait 2 days for your team to play just to end up with a 1-0 slog.
You summed it up nicely, 3v3 is the most intense/action-packed format and it has a lot of entertainment value. Especially for neutral viewers from non-traditional hockey countries.

So I think it has potential, but it's not going to be the next big thing. Clearly, no NHL player is going to be allowed to risk injury while taking part in this. Also, because of the nature of the 3v3 format, way more teams can compete. It doesn't have to be limited to 12 teams only.

This could open it up for countries that have never taken part in the Olympics, which is also a great thing, because it has potential spillover effect into regular hockey. It can help popularize the sport.

3v3 is also not going to give as much of an advantage to larger individuals, which is nice as a wider range of players can showcase their skill.
 

Czechboy

Náš f*cken barák!
Apr 15, 2018
28,467
25,655
Reading the thread I feel stupid saying this...

I think it's a great idea! I love it.

Especially if it has NHLers allowed... imagine the B level Yanks, Nucks or Swedes? They'd have amazing pools of leftovers. Be amazing hockey.
 

GrumpyKoala

Registered User
Aug 11, 2020
3,862
4,095
Yeah!! now do boxe but with only one fighter at a time. Curling but only with the broom
 

WayTooCold

Canada for gold
Jun 9, 2023
206
171
Remember when the UFC used to be just 1 weight class and 30minute round without any rules? That was fun to watch. Some crazy Canadian karatekas beating the crap out of everybody.

Nowadays there's millions of weight classes. Women, Men, Nonbinary, Transgender ...
Heavy weight division has been null void the last 10 years.
Nowadays there's only wimpy 5 minute rounds. Which is 5 minutes of gay wrestling and nothing happens.

You'll see much better fights for free at Canadian bars at 01:00 o'clock.

The UFC has been watered down. Do we want to water down hockey as well?
 

vorky

@vorkywh24
Jan 23, 2010
11,564
1,354
KHL will launch the 3on3 league in December. The competition will be played from December to mid July in the 2024-2025 season. The 24 games per team will be played on 34×18 m rink size, shootout instead of penalty, no hits, no fights. Teams: Dinamo Minsk, Avangard Omsk, Ak Bars Kazan, Barys Astana, Metallurg Mg, Salavat Yulaev Ufa, Sibir Novosibirsk, Traktor Chelyabinsk. Details at press-conference next week. Seems like at least one player/team must played 200+ KHL games, active KHLer can play as well, but I am not sure. Needs to wait for details.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrHockeyFan

Zine

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
12,398
2,549
Remember when the UFC used to be just 1 weight class and 30minute round without any rules? That was fun to watch. Some crazy Canadian karatekas beating the crap out of everybody.

Nowadays there's millions of weight classes. Women, Men, Nonbinary, Transgender ...
Heavy weight division has been null void the last 10 years.
Nowadays there's only wimpy 5 minute rounds. Which is 5 minutes of gay wrestling and nothing happens.

You'll see much better fights for free at Canadian bars at 01:00 o'clock.

The UFC has been watered down. Do we want to water down hockey as well?

Not comparable to UFC.

Full 3 v 3 hockey is more akin to how street-ball relates to the NBA. It's an interesting off-shoot of the original game,

I'm all for it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad