GDT: #30 | Red Wings at Flyers | Thursday, December 12, 2024 | 7:00 PM | NBCSP, 97.5 FM

Devonator

Registered User
Jan 5, 2003
4,868
2,718
A GDT that is only 7 pages long says it all.

Wins are piling up!
I am guessing the lack of responses here are because of the toxic negative attitude of most of the posters here.....most of the people here are miserable if we win or lose.....funny thing is when I check other Flyer forums whether on X or Facebook, they are far more optimistic and realistic.....for some reason here, we have a problem of group think save for a few decent posters.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,314
22,359
It was a good win, shouldn't have been that exciting at the end.

Couts does not look good the past few games, especially defensively, I remember when he'd shut down any chance of a comeback, now he looks a step slow in terms of reaction. They're going to have to move him to LW, maybe as early as next year. I think it's hurting both TK and Farabee playing with him.

The Cates line was their best line, and should have played more. All three are improving as they play together, Cates had a number of scoring chances, including a post

Frost line wasn't as good as the last few games, and the Poehling line was meh, Laughton had the one goal, but the rest of his scoring was SH and empty net.

Zamula-Risto look as good as Andrae-Risto. York-Sanheim weren't their usual self.
Drysdale was OK but not as good as the last two games. Seeler struggled.

Kolosov was lights out, it looks like Ersson/Kolosov from now on, do they waive Fedotov and try to send him to the AHL to work on his game?

I think this team is young, and like a lot of young teams, they're more comfortable trying to come back from behind where there's less pressure than holding on to a lead. It wasn't that they were in a shell the third period, but you could see the panic, they'd try to just throw the puck out of the D-zone instead of calmly passing it to a teammate or an open spot, and get pucks intercepted. That's where experience matters. And when they got the puck to the O-zone, they struggled with the cycle, unlike the 1st two periods when they were a possession monster.

Laughton had a career game, but with luck this will simply up his price, he's not someone they should build around going forward.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,314
22,359
1734064724659.jpeg
 

Flybynite

Registered User
Feb 25, 2018
7,457
14,612
what timeline is this that Laughton joins the mighty such as Jiri Dopita with a 4 goal game
And the Ducks have never had a player with a 4 goal game in franchise history. Even while having had Paul Kariya and Teemu Selanne (I think he actually had one in Winnipeg like a month or two before being traded to Anaheim)
 
  • Like
Reactions: CutOnDime97

DancingPanther

Foundational Titan
Jun 19, 2018
34,220
72,478
I am guessing the lack of responses here are because of the toxic negative attitude of most of the posters here.....most of the people here are miserable if we win or lose.....funny thing is when I check other Flyer forums whether on X or Facebook, they are far more optimistic and realistic.....for some reason here, we have a problem of group think save for a few decent posters.
Thoughts on the attempted Michigan?

No reason other than there are far better defensive players on the team.

Team wins

I hate this team.

STFU liberal
Thoughts on the attempted Michigan?
 

CerpinTaxt

Registered User
Apr 1, 2009
2,739
3,466
KY
It's amazing to me to see that some posters are more upset about people complaining about a sucky team, and not being upset by the sucky team. The Flyers are my favorite team too guys, but they currently suck. This game was fun, but they beat another shitty team. If they ripped off 30 wins in a row this year it would be awesome, and I'd still think their chances of going all the way would still be slim.

And before anyone is confused I'm not saying that you can't complain about other posters. I'm just baffled by where the vitriol is pointed at
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amorgus

mr figgles

Registered User
Mar 24, 2012
1,456
3,348
I am guessing the lack of responses here are because of the toxic negative attitude of most of the posters here.....most of the people here are miserable if we win or lose.....funny thing is when I check other Flyer forums whether on X or Facebook, they are far more optimistic and realistic.....for some reason here, we have a problem of group think save for a few decent posters.

Realistic is the last thing I think when I think of X and Facebook.
 

Breeze 44

Registered User
Jan 20, 2007
1,021
192
South Jersey
It was a good win, shouldn't have been that exciting at the end.

Couts does not look good the past few games, especially defensively, I remember when he'd shut down any chance of a comeback, now he looks a step slow in terms of reaction. They're going to have to move him to LW, maybe as early as next year. I think it's hurting both TK and Farabee playing with him.

The Cates line was their best line, and should have played more. All three are improving as they play together, Cates had a number of scoring chances, including a post

Frost line wasn't as good as the last few games, and the Poehling line was meh, Laughton had the one goal, but the rest of his scoring was SH and empty net.

Zamula-Risto look as good as Andrae-Risto. York-Sanheim weren't their usual self.
Drysdale was OK but not as good as the last two games. Seeler struggled.

Kolosov was lights out, it looks like Ersson/Kolosov from now on, do they waive Fedotov and try to send him to the AHL to work on his game?

I think this team is young, and like a lot of young teams, they're more comfortable trying to come back from behind where there's less pressure than holding on to a lead. It wasn't that they were in a shell the third period, but you could see the panic, they'd try to just throw the puck out of the D-zone instead of calmly passing it to a teammate or an open spot, and get pucks intercepted. That's where experience matters. And when they got the puck to the O-zone, they struggled with the cycle, unlike the 1st two periods when they were a possession monster.

Laughton had a career game, but with luck this will simply up his price, he's not someone they should build around going forward.
This is correct on many levels..especially Coots.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad