GDT: #30 | Red Wings at Flyers | Thursday, December 12, 2024 | 7:00 PM | NBCSP, 97.5 FM

Devonator

Registered User
Jan 5, 2003
4,868
2,715
A GDT that is only 7 pages long says it all.

Wins are piling up!
I am guessing the lack of responses here are because of the toxic negative attitude of most of the posters here.....most of the people here are miserable if we win or lose.....funny thing is when I check other Flyer forums whether on X or Facebook, they are far more optimistic and realistic.....for some reason here, we have a problem of group think save for a few decent posters.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,313
22,357
It was a good win, shouldn't have been that exciting at the end.

Couts does not look good the past few games, especially defensively, I remember when he'd shut down any chance of a comeback, now he looks a step slow in terms of reaction. They're going to have to move him to LW, maybe as early as next year. I think it's hurting both TK and Farabee playing with him.

The Cates line was their best line, and should have played more. All three are improving as they play together, Cates had a number of scoring chances, including a post

Frost line wasn't as good as the last few games, and the Poehling line was meh, Laughton had the one goal, but the rest of his scoring was SH and empty net.

Zamula-Risto look as good as Andrae-Risto. York-Sanheim weren't their usual self.
Drysdale was OK but not as good as the last two games. Seeler struggled.

Kolosov was lights out, it looks like Ersson/Kolosov from now on, do they waive Fedotov and try to send him to the AHL to work on his game?

I think this team is young, and like a lot of young teams, they're more comfortable trying to come back from behind where there's less pressure than holding on to a lead. It wasn't that they were in a shell the third period, but you could see the panic, they'd try to just throw the puck out of the D-zone instead of calmly passing it to a teammate or an open spot, and get pucks intercepted. That's where experience matters. And when they got the puck to the O-zone, they struggled with the cycle, unlike the 1st two periods when they were a possession monster.

Laughton had a career game, but with luck this will simply up his price, he's not someone they should build around going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devonator

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,313
22,357
1734064724659.jpeg
 

Flybynite

Registered User
Feb 25, 2018
7,457
14,611
what timeline is this that Laughton joins the mighty such as Jiri Dopita with a 4 goal game
And the Ducks have never had a player with a 4 goal game in franchise history. Even while having had Paul Kariya and Teemu Selanne (I think he actually had one in Winnipeg like a month or two before being traded to Anaheim)
 
  • Like
Reactions: CutOnDime97

DancingPanther

Foundational Titan
Jun 19, 2018
34,219
72,476
I am guessing the lack of responses here are because of the toxic negative attitude of most of the posters here.....most of the people here are miserable if we win or lose.....funny thing is when I check other Flyer forums whether on X or Facebook, they are far more optimistic and realistic.....for some reason here, we have a problem of group think save for a few decent posters.
Thoughts on the attempted Michigan?

No reason other than there are far better defensive players on the team.

Team wins

I hate this team.

STFU liberal
Thoughts on the attempted Michigan?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad