Proposal: 3 Way - VAN/WPG/MIN

[Vancity96]

Simple trade that could work for all three teams

To Van:
Mark Scheifele 6.125mil x 2 years

Out:
JT Miller
Van 2022 2nd Round Pick
Van 2022 3rd Round Pick

To Min:
JT Miller 5.25mil x 1 year

Out:
Matt Dumba 6mil x 1 year
Min 2022 1st Round Pick

To Wpg:
Matt Dumba
Min 2022 1st Round Pick
Van 2022 2nd Round Pick
Van 2022 3rd Round Pick

Out WPG:
Mark Scheifele

Vancouver does it:
Buys 1 extra year of a number 1 center, allows flexibility to move one of Boeser/Garland for D help while keeping an elite talent up front.

Minnesota does it:
Gives them a number 1 center that can play any role. Allows them to move Fiala for cap/help elsewhere without losing an elite forward

Winnipeg does it:
Allows them to have a change of voice in the locker room, get a top 4 RHD back which they have lacked after all of Buff/Trouba/Myers left, while also recouping 2 picks to help build depth through the draft.

Little things can be tinkered here and there but I think it works out for most teams.

Click to read more...

 

[Bazeek]

This leaves Minnesota with an even thinner blueline but still trying to compete next year? And it'd have no options to extend Miller. I don't think so.

 

[treple13]

I feel like Winnipeg would rather get more quality than 4 pieces for Schiefele

 

[wonton15]

You expect Rutherford to downgrade from Miller to Scheifele and pay an extra 2nd and 3rd on top, going against everything he has literally said?

Now that I look again, this might actually be a loss for all 3 teams lol

 

[sandwichbird2023]

Canucks doesn't have a 2022 2nd round pick. They are also not going to trade Miller + picks for 2 years of Schiefele, when they aren't in a position to compete in that time frame. Hard pass from Vancouver.

 

[VanillaCoke]

Ridiculous for Vancouver.

Dont need or want scheifele, not trading picks at all, and definitely trading miller for futures, not old centers.

And the mentally handicapped jim Benning already traded the 2022 2nd for OEL.

Really just close this up its literally the opposite of reality.

 

[Three On Zero]

Why would Vancouver downgrade?

 

[Ace of Hades]

I feel like Winnipeg would rather get more quality than 4 pieces for Schiefele

Cool story, because the Canucks will never make this trade regardless.

 

[Hoglander]

Kill it with fire.

 

[n8]

I don't see Vancouver making that deal. Minnesota weakens their blueline for a 1 yr rental. Winnipeg gets mostly magic beans. JT wants to resign so I think you get that sorted out first. I know these threads are all for fun but for just 1 extra year, seems like a weird trade. Why is this even 3 way? Conveniently ignoring a few issues, couldn't Minnesota start off with a package of Dumba and a 1st for Scheifele and cut Vancouver out of the deal? prospect swap of Rossi (remove the 1st) for Heinola could make it spicy and make both team fans instantly start saying no way

 

[treple13]

Cool story, because the Canucks will never make this trade regardless.

Didn't say they would. Canucks are better off trying to keep Miller or trade him for pure futures.

 

[MardyBum]

2 years of Scheifele for 1 year of Dumba and random picks. Nahh. Doesn't make sense for Vancouver either. Minnesota might like Scheifele/Miller as a C option but aren't they looking to shed straight cap due to the dead cap coming up? Figured they'd be trading Dumba/Fiala for young cheap options.

 

[Bazeek]

2 years of Scheifele for 1 year of Dumba and random picks. Nahh. Doesn't make sense for Vancouver either. Minnesota might like Scheifele as a C option but aren't they looking to shed straight cap due to the dead cap coming up? Figured they'd be trading Dumba/Fiala for young cheap options.

Which is what will actually happen. I don't think they're going to intentionally tank or anything, but trying to make any kind of push for the next 3 years would be beyond pointless. Whatever management might say publicly I'm sure that isn't lost on them.

 

[Digitalbooya]

I don't see Vancouver making that deal. Minnesota weakens their blueline for a 1 yr rental. Winnipeg gets mostly magic beans. JT wants to resign so I think you get that sorted out first. I know these threads are all for fun but for just 1 extra year, seems like a weird trade. Why is this even 3 way? Conveniently ignoring a few issues, couldn't Minnesota start off with a package of Dumba and a 1st for Scheifele and cut Vancouver out of the deal? prospect swap of Rossi (remove the 1st) for Heinola could make it spicy and make both team fans instantly start saying no way

Please no. Minnesota has enough LHD prospects.

 

[n8]

Please no. Minnesota has enough LHD prospects.

lol, yeah, they didn't have any RHD prospects so The OP is sort of

 

[Vancouver_2010]

As a canucks fan, you have to be joking.

 

[Ace of Hades]

Didn't say they would. Canucks are better off trying to keep Miller or trade him for pure futures.

The point is this does not help the Canucks whatesoever.

With that, we are in agreement.

 

[Snowman]

Not much chance Winnipeg takes an unneeded rental and package of mostly late picks. The Jets would need more quality, less quantity and no rentals.

 

[BatVader]

Jets Decline… but thanks for thinking of us

 

[Joseph Nathan]

No, Minnesota declines. They aren't trading dumba or 1st round picks for Jt Miller who they won't keep.

 

[Canuck Luck]

Jets end up winning this trade in a landslide and yet jets fans are saying no. Guess that tells you just how bad this proposal is

 

[Canucks LB]

Canucks downgrades and adds picks (They don't even have lol)?
What am i missing here