Lias disappointed me quite a bit with the way he handled himself. But it would be incredibly foolish to assume the results would have been the same under a different coach.
And I completely disagree that a coach can’t ruin a players career. That’s like saying, a parent can’t ruin a child’s life.
I understand good parents can raise bad children, and vice versa, but a coach can definitely have a severe impact on a players development. I’ll leave it at that because I think we’ve exhausted the whole Quinn/Lias situation.
Im just calling out some of the trends I’m seeing with Quinn and I have ultimately lost faith and trust in him.
Tell me how you quantify a coach ruining a kid's career.
If kid works out, coach did a good job?
If kid doesn't, coach did a bad job?
This makes zero sense to me and I assure you that there is no way you could ever prove your assertion.
Crosby would be great, no matter the coach.
It wouldn't have mattered who coached Lias Anderson. If it was a coach's fault that Anderson wasn't good, the next coach would make him much better.
Talent and effort is infinitely more important to a career of a player than a coach.
You have a theory that I've heard many times, yet there is zero evidence to back it up.
By the time a kid gets to the NHL, he is what he is. He can improve defensively. He can get better if he grows, fills out, matures etc,., but a coach ruining a kid is impossible to prove.