Prospect Info: 23-24 Prospect Poll #3 OA

Who's our #3 prospect

  • RW Jackson Blake - 2021 4th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RD Scott Morrow - 2021 2nd

    Votes: 21 45.7%
  • C Vasili Ponomarev - 2020 2nd

    Votes: 7 15.2%
  • RW Alexander Rykov - 2023 4th

    Votes: 1 2.2%
  • F Gleb Trikozov - 2022 2nd

    Votes: 1 2.2%
  • RW Felix Unger Sorum - 2023 2nd

    Votes: 15 32.6%
  • LD Dom Fensore - 2019 3rd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • LD Simon Forsmark - 2022 4th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • LD Vladimir Grudinin - 2022 5th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • W Noel Gunler - 2020 2nd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • C Nikita Guslitsov - 2021 7th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • G Patrik Hamrla - 2021 3rd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RD Aleksi Heimosalmi - 2021 2nd

    Votes: 1 2.2%
  • RD Anttoni Honka - 2019 3rd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • G Ruslan Khazheyev - 2023 5th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RW Ville Koivunen - 2021 2nd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RW Cruz Lucius - 2022 4th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • LW Timur Mukhanov - 2023 6th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RW Zion Nybeck - 2020 4th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RD Joel Nystrom - 2021 7th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F Alexander Pashin - 2020 7th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • G Yaniv Perets - 2023 UDFA

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • LW Alexander Perevalov - 2022 3rd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RW Jayden Perron - 2023 3rd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F Jamieson Rees - 2019 2nd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • C Justin Robidas - 2021 5th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • LD Ronan Seeley - 2020 7th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RD Kirill Slepets - 2019 5th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • C Ryan Suzuki - 2019 1st

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RW Tuukka Tieksola - 2019 4th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • G Jakub Vondras - 2022 6th

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • LW Stanislav Yarovi - 2023 4th

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .

cptjeff

Reprehensible User
Sep 18, 2008
21,833
39,344
Washington, DC.
The fact that D-Fens plays defense, it was a no brainer for our front office.
I still don't understand why we don't try to move him to forward. He has zero chance of making the NHL on defense, despite the name. I'm a big fan of the little guys, but lord, you need at least *some* size to play D in the NHL.

The odds of pulling it off are low, but low is better than zero.
 

AhosDatsyukian

Registered User
Sep 25, 2020
11,455
33,480
Morrow should be it. IMO he should be #2, but I get why our latest 1st rounder would get a majority of votes. As nice as Nadeau's shot is, I just think that potential top-4 RHD are that important and that valuable.
Elite goal scorer is much rarer than top 4 RHD. Top pair RHD is more of an argument and Morrow certainly does have that upside in my view. But I think Nadeau is more likely to become an elite goal scorer than Morrow is to become an elite top pair guy. Not saying either is likely to reach those heights, both are long odds I just like Nadeau's a bit better. Both have similar (relatively low) floors IMO.
 

TheReelChuckFletcher

Former TheRillestPaulFenton; Harverd Alum
Jun 30, 2011
10,967
25,013
Raleigh and Chapel Hill, NC
Elite goal scorer is much rarer than top 4 RHD. Top pair RHD is more of an argument and Morrow certainly does have that upside in my view. But I think Nadeau is more likely to become an elite goal scorer than Morrow is to become an elite top pair guy. Not saying either is likely to reach those heights, both are long odds I just like Nadeau's a bit better. Both have similar (relatively low) floors IMO.

I don't think that his ceiling is elite goal scorer. I always saw him as a potential top-6 winger with a great shot, which is valuable, of course, but I tend to lean more in favor of a potential top-4 RHD when push comes to shove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cptjeff

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
25,187
43,572
colorado
Visit site
I disagree. I think readiness should play a role in these rankings, and they do with my votes for sure. The fact a guy is likely going to make it and is essentially there carries a lot of weight, and despite us thinking we know they won’t be more than bottom six doesn’t mean they won’t surprise. So few of the guys we rank off their perceived ceilings will ever come close to making the league at all let alone hit their ceilings. Pono as a third liner will likely make him top five on this list looking back five years from now, not hard to imagine him being higher. Not only off his own success as much as the likely lack of success of the others.

It’s no easy thing to be at the point where you’ve got one foot in the league.
 

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,537
39,947
I still don't understand why we don't try to move him to forward. He has zero chance of making the NHL on defense, despite the name. I'm a big fan of the little guys, but lord, you need at least *some* size to play D in the NHL.

The odds of pulling it off are low, but low is better than zero.
Isn’t he the same size as Krug?
 
Jul 18, 2010
26,721
57,555
Atlanta, GA
Little guy? Can’t make it on D?

He is 6’2 195. That is larger than quite a few nhl defenders, including chatty and tda.

Defense isn’t his strong suit but that is the way of the nhl these days. Makar isn’t a very good defender but he can skate like the wind and provides forward like offense. TDA definitely isn’t any good but again he can skate and provide a lot of offense. Those are just two examples. Morrow is a very good skater and provides a lot of offense, its a mold.

Fensore is the player being talked about, not Morrow.
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,500
92,983
I went with FUS, though I almost went with Pono. And my reasoning here is that I really just don't know what to think of the NCAA pipeline right now. I want to think Morrow will be really good, and I know a lot of people are telling us that he is, but that's one of those I just need to see it before I am convinced. With FUS and Pono, I've already seen them play a bit with the Canes, I've already seen them taking shifts and they both look like they could contribute very soon with high upside, so I went with them, and FUS seems to have the higher upside right now.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad