WJC: 2025 Team Canada Roster Talk

Mathieukferland

Registered User
Oct 11, 2020
1,712
1,863
Sloane Square, Chelsea, England
Perimeter player? PP merchant?

It's Cristall and he leads the WHL in even-strength points per game by a mile. In 15 games he has 40 points and 9 of those on the PP. He was the best player in the Summer Showcase too.

Don't let the facts get in the way of your arguments.
I didn’t watch the summer showcase as Hlinka was on at the same time; I hated the way he played at u18, for the reasons I listed. But it looks like he’s having a good season in Kewlona and we will see what his chances are for December
 

qc14

Registered User
Jul 1, 2024
348
610
I didn’t watch the summer showcase as Hlinka was on at the same time; I hated the way he played at u18, for the reasons I listed. But it looks like he’s having a good season in Kewlona and we will see what his chances are for December
Insane that the talk around him from Canadians is about whether he can be a good 13th forward and not as the player they should be building the team around. He's not just having a good season in Kelowna -- it's a historically amazing season and probably the best junior season period by any u20 forward in the world this year.

As an American I'll take them overthinking things and holding spots for plugs like Barkey and Luchanko though
 
  • Like
Reactions: um

1Gold Standard

Registered User
Jun 13, 2012
7,930
245
No thread for the CHL - USA games?

I do hope this is the format Hockey Canada will stick with indefinitely for World Junior evaluations pre-camp, I've been wanting the other team dropped for better competition for about a decade.
 

kyle44

Registered User
Jan 7, 2007
986
1,093
No thread for the CHL - USA games?

I do hope this is the format Hockey Canada will stick with indefinitely for World Junior evaluations pre-camp, I've been wanting the other team dropped for better competition for about a decade.

I mean, I suppose they are using it as a tool, but given the tendency to almost always favor 19-year olds and players in their D+1 (who aren't playing in these games) I don't think it will be very useful for choosing the U-20 team outside of maybe 4-5 guys per year. That is, unless they change the format to allow players on both sides that are over 18.

Looking at this team, only Martone, Misa, Spence, Schaefer and Ravensbergen/Ivankovic have realistic shots at a camp invite, let alone a roster spot. This format is not like the old CHL-Russia series where the best of the CHL players, regardless of age and draft status, were evaluated against international competition.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Statsy

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,320
14,656
I mean, I suppose they are using it as a tool, but given the tendency to almost always favor 19-year olds and players in their D+1 (who aren't playing in these games) I don't think it will be very useful for choosing the U-20 team outside of maybe 4-5 guys per year. That is, unless they change the format to allow players on both sides that are over 18.

Looking at this team, only Martone, Misa, Spence, Schaefer and Ravensbergen/Ivankovic have realistic shots at a camp invite, let alone a roster spot. It is not like the old CHL-Russia series where the best of the CHL players, regardless of age and draft status, could be evaluated against international competition.
True, and this year is probably an outlier in that Canada has multiple highly touted 18 year olds who are old for the 2025 draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyle44

dino200022

Registered User
Leroux saying in air that they’re going to have a small camp this year; only 6 or 7 players to cut. Disappointing that they’re not having a real camp

I agree, having the internal competition between 40 or so players is super healthy and will let you pick the rights players for the roles you are looking for. It also lets you see the players that have cohesiaon which is huge for short tournament.

Just hand picking 25 guys and hoping they gel does not make much sense to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dominance

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,320
14,656
Leroux saying in air that they’re going to have a small camp this year; only 6 or 7 players to cut. Disappointing that they’re not having a real camp
Not surprising that they are not shaking things up despite last year featuring the worst decision making in recent Canadian WJC history. Not smart either obviously.
 

Statsy

Registered User
Dec 21, 2009
4,671
2,508
Vancouver
I agree, having the internal competition between 40 or so players is super healthy and will let you pick the rights players for the roles you are looking for. It also lets you see the players that have cohesiaon which is huge for short tournament.

Just hand picking 25 guys and hoping they gel does not make much sense to me.
I'm not personally against a large camp, but to say there would be more cohesion with a large camp doesn't really make sense. A smaller camp lets the players play more with one another to build that chemistry.
 

yessir29292

Registered User
Dec 11, 2021
250
145
I'm not personally against a large camp, but to say there would be more cohesion with a large camp doesn't really make sense. A smaller camp lets the players play more with one another to build that chemistry.
exactly why the camp is small… to use it more as a training camp than selection camp
 

SpoolCat

Registered User
Mar 1, 2016
603
328
Well I'd imagine the camp roster will be announced soon so I figured I'd give my roster. I tried to take into account a mixture of what I'd want and what I expect.

Rehkopf Yager Wood
Cowan Heidt Nadeau
McKenna Ritchie Sennecke
Barkey Luchenko Martone
Cataford

Molendyk Yakemchuk
Dickinson Bonk
Chadwick Parekh
Mynio
Bjarnason
Ratzlaff
I agree with others I'm not sure about the top end of this team but I feel all the forwards can score and are very balanced. I worry that Luchenko might get put in the Minten position he might be overplayed because he played in the NHL when I feel like he's probably best in a bottom six role as a matchup centre.
I have Heidt over Catton because he is older. I feel like Hockey Canada are big believers in paying your dues.
I read an article from the Hockey News and I think I saw somewhere else that Hockey Canada might want just one of Yakemchuk or Parekh. I think I'd lean Yakemchuk because he's older and he had an excellent pre season in the NHL. I'd expect the bottom pair to be made up with Chadwick or Mynio or someone else more defensive than Parekh but I just don't can't leave off a top 10 pick. Lastly I really wish I could have put Schaefer in there but I just couldn't find a spot.
I don't really see anyone talking about the goaltending but I'm kind curious; Ratzlaff is a rare returnee goalie but Bjarnason is the better goalie this season statistically.

Lastly I really wish we would utilize the spares. I feel like every year since 2019 now we've had at least one injury. Last years team had a lot of problems but I believe a big one was the fact that we were constantly bringing in new players so there was no chemistry. Hockey Canada says they don't want to take players away from their teams unnecessarily but I don't know I just don't know if that works for me. The hardcore junior fans would be excited that one of their players is on the Canadian national team getting experience for later down the year in the playoffs. The casuals probably wouldn't even know. Worse case scenario you can just make the spares 18 year olds for experience. I don't even think the way Hockey Canada does it is even kind to the players. Wasn't Jorian Donovan at a spa with his girlfriend and Nelson was on a family vacation so all their plans were thrown into a blender at the last minute.
 

Mathieukferland

Registered User
Oct 11, 2020
1,712
1,863
Sloane Square, Chelsea, England
Well I'd imagine the camp roster will be announced soon so I figured I'd give my roster. I tried to take into account a mixture of what I'd want and what I expect.

Rehkopf Yager Wood
Cowan Heidt Nadeau
McKenna Ritchie Sennecke
Barkey Luchenko Martone
Cataford

Molendyk Yakemchuk
Dickinson Bonk
Chadwick Parekh
Mynio
Bjarnason
Ratzlaff
I agree with others I'm not sure about the top end of this team but I feel all the forwards can score and are very balanced. I worry that Luchenko might get put in the Minten position he might be overplayed because he played in the NHL when I feel like he's probably best in a bottom six role as a matchup centre.
I have Heidt over Catton because he is older. I feel like Hockey Canada are big believers in paying your dues.
I read an article from the Hockey News and I think I saw somewhere else that Hockey Canada might want just one of Yakemchuk or Parekh. I think I'd lean Yakemchuk because he's older and he had an excellent pre season in the NHL. I'd expect the bottom pair to be made up with Chadwick or Mynio or someone else more defensive than Parekh but I just don't can't leave off a top 10 pick. Lastly I really wish I could have put Schaefer in there but I just couldn't find a spot.
I don't really see anyone talking about the goaltending but I'm kind curious; Ratzlaff is a rare returnee goalie but Bjarnason is the better goalie this season statistically.

Lastly I really wish we would utilize the spares. I feel like every year since 2019 now we've had at least one injury. Last years team had a lot of problems but I believe a big one was the fact that we were constantly bringing in new players so there was no chemistry. Hockey Canada says they don't want to take players away from their teams unnecessarily but I don't know I just don't know if that works for me. The hardcore junior fans would be excited that one of their players is on the Canadian national team getting experience for later down the year in the playoffs. The casuals probably wouldn't even know. Worse case scenario you can just make the spares 18 year olds for experience. I don't even think the way Hockey Canada does it is even kind to the players. Wasn't Jorian Donovan at a spa with his girlfriend and Nelson was on a family vacation so all their plans were thrown into a blender at the last minute.
Thanks for this. After the disaster that was last year, I hope the management learns from it. I would find it really hard to leave out Schaefer and Catton. For me if you’re going to go down, go down riding your most talented players, which was not the case last year.

If you’re a Lethbridge fan, apart from the obvious connection to management, what do you see that would tip the balance in the direction of Chadwick over Schaefer for 3LD in terms of on ice attributes?
 

Mathieukferland

Registered User
Oct 11, 2020
1,712
1,863
Sloane Square, Chelsea, England
M. Misa-Catton-Greentree

Wanting to recreate the productivity of Misa and Catton from Hlinka, I opt to pair those two again. Greentree is rewarded for his strong start and clutch u18 by playing the role of Wetsch on that line, a big body that can win battles and create space

McKenna-Ritchie-Sennecke

Sennecke and Ritchie have familiarity from Oshawa even if they haven’t always played on the same line on there. Ritchie played really well with Celebrini at the U18, so he can handle the sometimes difficult intellectual aspect of playing with a player as talented as McKenna

Rehkopf-Yager-Martone

Rehkopf and Yager played well together last year and were some of the lone bright spots for a team that was starved of offense. They no longer have Celebrini centring them, but a player that Rehkopf is familiar with from Mississauga, Martone, is added to the line to add size and skill. This is a ridiculous secondary scoring line that few teams will have an answer for.

Cowan-Luchanko-Nadeau

Cowan and Luchanko are the closest to what I would call matchup players in this forward group. Boisvert gets the DEI Quota inclusion being the sole Quebec player on this team because he can hit and plays physical and play on the type of matchup line that is useful in a tournament like this. Cataford was bad in the Hlinka I saw him play in, Gauthier is having just an okay season, and Carbonneau doesn’t fit the profile of someone who plays on a line like this

Nadeau

I put a heavy emphasis on chemistry to avoid the issues of last year, so it was a bit hard to find a spot to put Nadeau. Nonetheless, he’s a capable offensive player than can fill in anywhere in the top 9 if a spark is needed

Extra: Iginla, Cristall

Iginla is in tough to make the team on a stacked left side, and Cristall just left such a bad taste in my mouth after his u18 that I would rather forgo his offensive production than have to deal with all the off the puck issues

Molendyk-Yakemchuk

Molendyk is basically a returnee and will log heavy minutes. He provides a safety blanket for Yakemchuk to activate more often as he has in Calgary.

Dickinson-Bonk

Logical pairing because they play on the same brigade in London even if they aren’t always paired together. Dickinson has been the best defenseman in the CHL and brings everything in all aspects, Bonk was just okay last year but has become better with London as time has gone on.

Schaefer-Brunicke

Schaefer’s unbelievable start and Sterling international record earns him a spot. He’s paired with a safety blanket in Brunicke who can give him licence to get forward. Familiarity from the u18s.

Price

Had a good u18 on an otherwise bad defensive group, has many aspects to his game and can be versatile if he needs to fill in throughout the top 6

Extras: Mews, Parekh

Mews is probably closer than most people think because of his connections to Cameron, and he has a good u18 and Hlinka. Parekh is someone that is deemed surplus to requirements, as there already plenty of offensive producers in the group that render his risk-reward style too risky for a stage this big.

Bjarnason
George

George has played well for Canada in the past, and even on a terrible Owen Sound team has decent Numbers. Bjarnason has been one of the best if not the best goaltenders in the whole CHL, and has the profile of a true number 1, the best Canada would have had at this tournament since Carter Hart.

Extra: Ravensbergen

Beats out Ivankovic and will gain valuable experience for next year. Looked solid in the prospects game
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJB

TheDoldrums

Registered User
May 3, 2016
13,069
20,357
Newcastle, Ontario
M. Misa-Catton-Greentree

Wanting to recreate the productivity of Misa and Catton from Hlinka, I opt to pair those two again. Greentree is rewarded for his strong start and clutch u18 by playing the role of Wetsch on that line, a big body that can win battles and create space

McKenna-Ritchie-Sennecke

Sennecke and Ritchie have familiarity from Oshawa even if they haven’t always played on the same line on there. Ritchie played really well with Celebrini at the U18, so he can handle the sometimes difficult intellectual aspect of playing with a player as talented as McKenna

Rehkopf-Yager-Martone

Rehkopf and Yager played well together last year and were some of the lone bright spots for a team that was starved of offense. They no longer have Celebrini centring them, but a player that Rehkopf is familiar with from Mississauga, Martone, is added to the line to add size and skill. This is a ridiculous secondary scoring line that few teams will have an answer for.

Cowan-Luchanko-Nadeau

Cowan and Luchanko are the closest to what I would call matchup players in this forward group. Boisvert gets the DEI Quota inclusion being the sole Quebec player on this team because he can hit and plays physical and play on the type of matchup line that is useful in a tournament like this. Cataford was bad in the Hlinka I saw him play in, Gauthier is having just an okay season, and Carbonneau doesn’t fit the profile of someone who plays on a line like this

Nadeau

I put a heavy emphasis on chemistry to avoid the issues of last year, so it was a bit hard to find a spot to put Nadeau. Nonetheless, he’s a capable offensive player than can fill in anywhere in the top 9 if a spark is needed

Extra: Iginla, Cristall

Iginla is in tough to make the team on a stacked left side, and Cristall just left such a bad taste in my mouth after his u18 that I would rather forgo his offensive production than have to deal with all the off the puck issues

Molendyk-Yakemchuk

Molendyk is basically a returnee and will log heavy minutes. He provides a safety blanket for Yakemchuk to activate more often as he has in Calgary.

Dickinson-Bonk

Logical pairing because they play on the same brigade in London even if they aren’t always paired together. Dickinson has been the best defenseman in the CHL and brings everything in all aspects, Bonk was just okay last year but has become better with London as time has gone on.

Schaefer-Brunicke

Schaefer’s unbelievable start and Sterling international record earns him a spot. He’s paired with a safety blanket in Brunicke who can give him licence to get forward. Familiarity from the u18s.

Price

Had a good u18 on an otherwise bad defensive group, has many aspects to his game and can be versatile if he needs to fill in throughout the top 6

Extras: Mews, Parekh

Mews is probably closer than most people think because of his connections to Cameron, and he has a good u18 and Hlinka. Parekh is someone that is deemed surplus to requirements, as there already plenty of offensive producers in the group that render his risk-reward style too risky for a stage this big.

Bjarnason
George

George has played well for Canada in the past, and even on a terrible Owen Sound team has decent Numbers. Bjarnason has been one of the best if not the best goaltenders in the whole CHL, and has the profile of a true number 1, the best Canada would have had at this tournament since Carter Hart.

Extra: Ravensbergen

Beats out Ivankovic and will gain valuable experience for next year. Looked solid in the prospects game

17-18-18
16-19-18
19-19-18
19-18-18

Okay McKenna will turn 17 before the real games start but look at those ages in the top 6! I know this is likely your list and not what you expect but there's no way the forward group is this young.
 

Mathieukferland

Registered User
Oct 11, 2020
1,712
1,863
Sloane Square, Chelsea, England
17-18-18
16-19-18
19-19-18
19-18-18

Okay McKenna will turn 17 before the real games start but look at those ages in the top 6! I know this is likely your list and not what you expect but there's no way the forward group is this young.
Yes obviously I’m not expecting Hockey Canada of all organizations to take that many younger players. But I think if you’re playing well, you deserve to be there on merit rather than tenure. Canada had a similar mixture in 2020 and won (3 undrafted forwards and only 7 19 year olds, I have 5) powered largely by 2 18 year olds in Cozens and Lafrenière, so I’m ready fo trust someone like Misa over Barkey, Wood etc
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,320
14,656
Well I'd imagine the camp roster will be announced soon so I figured I'd give my roster. I tried to take into account a mixture of what I'd want and what I expect.

Rehkopf Yager Wood
Cowan Heidt Nadeau
McKenna Ritchie Sennecke
Barkey Luchenko Martone
Cataford

Molendyk Yakemchuk
Dickinson Bonk
Chadwick Parekh
Mynio
Bjarnason
Ratzlaff
I agree with others I'm not sure about the top end of this team but I feel all the forwards can score and are very balanced. I worry that Luchenko might get put in the Minten position he might be overplayed because he played in the NHL when I feel like he's probably best in a bottom six role as a matchup centre.
I have Heidt over Catton because he is older. I feel like Hockey Canada are big believers in paying your dues.
I read an article from the Hockey News and I think I saw somewhere else that Hockey Canada might want just one of Yakemchuk or Parekh. I think I'd lean Yakemchuk because he's older and he had an excellent pre season in the NHL. I'd expect the bottom pair to be made up with Chadwick or Mynio or someone else more defensive than Parekh but I just don't can't leave off a top 10 pick. Lastly I really wish I could have put Schaefer in there but I just couldn't find a spot.
I don't really see anyone talking about the goaltending but I'm kind curious; Ratzlaff is a rare returnee goalie but Bjarnason is the better goalie this season statistically.

Lastly I really wish we would utilize the spares. I feel like every year since 2019 now we've had at least one injury. Last years team had a lot of problems but I believe a big one was the fact that we were constantly bringing in new players so there was no chemistry. Hockey Canada says they don't want to take players away from their teams unnecessarily but I don't know I just don't know if that works for me. The hardcore junior fans would be excited that one of their players is on the Canadian national team getting experience for later down the year in the playoffs. The casuals probably wouldn't even know. Worse case scenario you can just make the spares 18 year olds for experience. I don't even think the way Hockey Canada does it is even kind to the players. Wasn't Jorian Donovan at a spa with his girlfriend and Nelson was on a family vacation so all their plans were thrown into a blender at the last minute.
I agree, Hockey Canada should focus on winning the tournament, not doing the CHL a solid by leaving an extra player or two in the CHL rather than sitting in the press box. No one is going to have their development hindered by being the spare at this tournament. It should have always been obvious but especially after last year they need to take the full allotment of players.
 

Statsy

Registered User
Dec 21, 2009
4,671
2,508
Vancouver
17-18-18
16-19-18
19-19-18
19-18-18

Okay McKenna will turn 17 before the real games start but look at those ages in the top 6! I know this is likely your list and not what you expect but there's no way the forward group is this young.
As I was going through his roster I was thinking that he had just recently re-watched the U18’s. :laugh:

This lineup is going to look great a year from now.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad