scott99
Registered User
- May 13, 2005
- 11,055
- 1,670
But WELL after the puck was gone, hence a dirty play. It was unnecessary.Honestly it looked shoulder to shoulder on the replay. I don't think it was particularly dirty.
But WELL after the puck was gone, hence a dirty play. It was unnecessary.Honestly it looked shoulder to shoulder on the replay. I don't think it was particularly dirty.
Watch the replay, it really isn't that long after. That probably isn't even a penalty in the OHL.But WELL after the puck was gone, hence a dirty play. It was unnecessary.
It was dirty; it may not have been a head contact, but the Slovak player is not playing the puck - the kid is not expecting it. Absolutely, a penalty.Honestly it looked shoulder to shoulder on the replay. I don't think it was particularly dirty.
Whoops. That was a nasty one though
Honestly it looked shoulder to shoulder on the replay. I don't think it was particularly dirty.
By the way, while watching the U18s, Sweden & Canada are full of excellent prospects for the 2025 draft, not surprising they both made it to the U18 Finals. Sweden has the top 3 scorers and the top 2 goal scorers. Filip Ekberg is having a monster U18s with 10 goals and 8 assists in 6 games so far (broke a Swedish record). Ivar Stenberg has 8 goals, 5 assists and 13 points, also in 6 games. And Sasha Boumedianne, a defenseman, has 1 goal and 13 assists for 14 points in 6 games.
The Canadians have 4 of the top 10 point scorers (including Brady Martin). The Americans were led by forwards Will Moore and LJ Mooney who each had 11 points.
He had just played the puck. Like Chapin says, it was just a tad late in real time. Dirty would imply intentional, but it was just unfortunate timing.It was dirty; it may not have been a head contact, but the Slovak player is not playing the puck - the kid is not expecting it. Absolutely, a penalty.
Odd that 9th picks outperform 8th picks. I wonder what 10-15 looks like? I think there's a point where teams feel more free to depart from the consensus - not sure if that impacts outcomes long-term.In the last 25 years of the draft -
Summary Table by Draft Position (%):
Pick # Bust NHL Player Top 6/Top 4 Top Line HOF Success Rate Too Early 1st 4% 0% 12% 28% 52% 80% 4% 2nd 4% 8% 16% 28% 32% 60% 8% 3rd 8% 24% 20% 24% 16% 40% 4% 4th 8% 24% 20% 20% 20% 40% 4% 5th 12% 20% 16% 32% 8% 40% 12% 6th 24% 8% 32% 20% 4% 24% 12% 7th 24% 12% 28% 20% 8% 28% 8% 8th 40% 16% 20% 4% 8% 12% 12% 9th 24% 12% 24% 28% 0% 28% 12% 10th 44% 20% 12% 8% 4% 12% 12%
- Bust = Bust
- NHL Player = bottom 6, bottom pair, decent goalie
- top6/top 4/starting goalie
- Top line player/top pairing/all-star goalie
- HOF = Hall of Fame or trajectory is Hall of Fame
- Too early = still a prospect
He's actually my favorite player in the draft. I love players that always have their feet moving and play hard. Never quit on the play and putting up 19 goals in a mens league is impressive. Has skill and competes.It sure was - and there was some real panic in him as soon as he realized what happened.
Scary!
Staying on draft track:
We've barely mentioned the younger Eklund in the past week or so, but for my liking, he's every bit as good as his older brother, and likely a better goalscorer.
Yea he’s one of my favorites as well, it’s just that for a team like the Isles who struggle with ufa’s, it’s important to target key positions like C and high end dmen in the draft. Eklund as a player is probably worth a 5-7 pick, but he’s a small winger which is as replaceable as a position gets. I think I still value him high enough though where I’d be very excited he falls to 10.He's actually my favorite player in the draft. I love players that always have their feet moving and play hard. Never quit on the play and putting up 19 goals in a mens league is impressive. Has skill and competes.
![]()
Matthew Schaefer, Roger McQueen generate intriguing talking points in McKenzie's NHL Draft Ranking | TSN
TSN’s survey of 10 NHL team scouts provide some interesting questions leading into the NHL Draft Lottery, which will be held on Monday night in Secaucus, N.J.www.tsn.ca
McKenzie has Hagans rated 5th on his latest rankings
Does not sound like this is really the year to win the lottery. I guess it never hurts but those top 2 forwards seem awfully small and a DMan going one unless you're talking Hedman type level which he definitely is not often does not have the impact you hope.
Every year is the year to win the lottery. You never know when you'll do it again.
***
I don't care what folks say about this draft when labelling it "weaker"!
#Haggle for Hagens![]()
![]()
![]()
I have to admit, I do value the fact that he is a hometown guy.If Hagens falls to 5 or 6 We might have a shot of trading up. Now that being said it would be hard pressed seeing Boston and Philly it those picks passing him up
Yeah, I don't know about dirty, but it was late by North American standards, and very late by international standards. Martin definitely didn't stride into the hit or launch into it.He had just played the puck. Like Chapin says, it was just a tad late in real time. Dirty would imply intentional, but it was just unfortunate timing.
I agree. I like Eklund a lot. I imagine the combine is going to be important for him - does he have enough of a frame to fill out? Because if he does, he's going to be an excellent pro player. If he doesn't it's going to be a tough slog.He's actually my favorite player in the draft. I love players that always have their feet moving and play hard. Never quit on the play and putting up 19 goals in a mens league is impressive. Has skill and competes.
With the tourney over, I think the biggest impact on a player felt to go in the top 6 or 7 has far and away been to Frondell.
Here's a thought:If Hagens falls to 5 or 6 We might have a shot of trading up. Now that being said it would be hard pressed seeing Boston and Philly it those picks passing him up
If by some miracle the Islanders win the lottery they should pick Schaefer and trade Dobson for 3rd overall and pick Hagens.